Skip to content

Is Mitral Annuloplasty an Effective Treatment for Severe Atrial Functional MR?

Is Mitral Annuloplasty an Effective Treatment for Severe Atrial Functional MR?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05836376
Enrollment
55
Registered
2023-05-01
Start date
2020-11-30
Completion date
2020-12-02
Last updated
2023-05-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mitral Regurgitation

Brief summary

Atrial functional mitral regurgitation (MR) is caused by annular dilatation and flattering associated with altered atria/annulus dynamics in patients with severely dilated left atrium and normal leaflets anatomy. Inadequate leaflets adaption is considered a mechanistic culprit as well. Prevalence of at least moderate atrial functional MR varies between 4.7% and 7% in patients with permanent and long standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and is even higher in patients with Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF). Unlike secondary MR in the setting of left ventricular disease, results of surgical treatment of severe atrial functional MR has remained largely unspoken. The aim of this study is to analyze short and mid-term results of isolated annuloplasty in patients with severe, symptomatic atrial functional MR, in comparission to a matched cohort of patients with secondary MR.

Interventions

implantation of a prosthetic ring to treat mitral valve regurgitation

Sponsors

Michele De Bonis
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_CONTROL
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

Atrial MR group Inclusion criteria * Adult patients, underwent mitral annuloplasty for atrial functional mitral Anatomical criteria * Annular dilatation with anterior-posterior diameter (AP) in systole \>35mm * Ratio of AP diameter in systole to anterior leaflet length in diastole \>1.3 * Normal leaflets anatomy * Mild fibrosis may be present * A small cleft may be present as a result of annular dilatation Functional criteria * Normal leaflet mobility (Carpentier type I) * Coaptation depth \<10mm * Absence of ventricular tethering * Centrality of the regurgitant jet Atrial and ventricular characteristics * Left atrium diameter \> 40 mm * Normal systolic function of the left ventricle * Mild left ventricular systolic dysfunction Mild LV (tachycardia induced) with EF \>45% * Absence of regional abnormalities in left ventricular wall motion Clinical criteria * Persistent, long-standing persistent, or permanent atrial fibrillation

Exclusion criteria

* Degenerative MR including congenital clefts * LVEF \< 45% * Ventricular tethering * Coaptation depth \>10 mm * Regional abnormalities in left ventricular wall motion * Sinus rhythm * Presence of coronary artery disease * Absence of annular dilatation Non-atrial MR group Inclusion criteria * Adult patients underwent cardiac surgery for non-atrial functional mitral regurgitation in the setting of an idiopathic or ischemic cardiomyopathy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Mortality30 days

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026