Skip to content

Study to Assess the Reliability of PASI Scoring Using Digital-Based Images

Study to Assess the Reliability of Psoriasis Area Severity Index Scoring Using Digital-Based Images Compared to In-Person Evaluation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05835843
Enrollment
34
Registered
2023-04-28
Start date
2023-06-02
Completion date
2025-09-05
Last updated
2025-09-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Plaque Psoriasis

Keywords

psoriasis, remote assessment, digital photographs

Brief summary

This is an open-labeled study to evaluate the reliability of digital photographs for the remote assessment of the disease severity of plaque psoriasis.

Detailed description

This study is being conducted to evaluate the reliability of digital photography for the remote assessment of psoriasis disease severity using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) compared to in-person evaluations. Approximately 30 adult subjects will undergo in-person assessments of the severity of the disease and have digital photographs taken for comparative remote evaluations.

Interventions

OTHERIn-Person and Remote Disease Assessment

Disease severity will be assessed during the in-person visit and standardized digital photographs of different body regions and/or the full body will be collected for remote evaluations by external dermatologists.

Sponsors

Innovaderm Research Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female subjects aged 18 to 75 years, inclusive, at the time of consent. 2. Subject has at least a 6-month history of plaque psoriasis prior to screening visit (information obtained from medical chart or subject's physician, or directly from the subject). 3. Subject has plaque psoriasis covering at least 0.5% his/her total BSA at screening/Day 1 visit. 4. Subject has a PGA score ≥2 at screening/Day 1 visit.

Exclusion criteria

1\. Subject has a history of skin disease or presence of skin condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with the study assessments.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) between Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) assessed in-person and using digital photographs, all cohorts combined.Day 1The PASI is a composite score ranging from 0 to 72 that takes into account the degree of erythema, induration/infiltration, and desquamation (each scored from 0 to 4 separately) for each of 4 body regions, with adjustments for the percentage of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) between Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) assessed in-person and using digital photographs, all cohorts combined and by cohort.Day 1The PGA is a global assessment of the current state of the disease. It is a 5-point morphological assessment of overall disease severity.
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) between Body Surface Area (BSA) assessed in-person and using digital photographs, all cohorts combined and by cohort.Day 1The %BSA affected by psoriasis will be evaluated from 1 to 100%.
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) between PASI assessed in-person and using digital photographs, by cohort.Day 1
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of PASI scores assessed using digital photographs by the same assessor.Day 1This outcome measure will assess the variation in PASI scores when evaluated multiple times by the same assessor using digital photographs (intra-rater variability).
Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) of PASI scores assessed using digital photographs by 2 assessors.Day 1This outcome measure will assess agreement between assessors using digital photographs (inter-rater variability).

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026