Peri-Implantitis, Peri-implant Mucositis, Periodontitis
Conditions
Keywords
dental implant, history of periodontitis, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8, histological analysis, next generation sequencing, dental plaque, gingival crevicular fluids, peri-implant sulcular fluids, peri-implant soft tissue, proteomic analysis
Brief summary
This prospective parallel, double-blind, four-arm randomised controlled clinical study is planned to assess the difference in the level of the inflammatory biomarkers expressed following the placement of the first dental implant in patients with history of periodontitis (successfully treated) and healthy controls without the disease, during implant osseointegration period. The subjects in both groups will also be randomised to receive one of the two types of implants provided which have different surface treatment.
Detailed description
This is a prospective, parallel, double-blind, four-arm randomised clinical control study, aims to investigate the changes of clinical parameters and pro-inflammatory biomarkers expression and the shift following the first dental implant placement in patients who have been successfully treated for periodontitis, compared with healthy control without the disease. The main questions to answer are: 1. Why do patients with history of periodontitis are at a greater risk to develop peri-implantitis than patients without history of periodontitis? 2. Is there any difference in the microbial composition, histological and immunological reaction of the host's dental plaque, peri-implant soft tissue, gingival crevicular fluids (GCF) of adjacent teeth and peri-implant sulcular fluids (PISF) following implant placement in patients with and without a history of periodontitis? The test group will consist of subjects with stabilised periodontitis, whilst the control group will consist of healthy patients with no history of periodontitis, as identified via history taking and clinical screening. Periodontal condition will be determined based on the new 2017 periodontal classification. All participants in both groups will be randomised to receive one of two types of implants with different surface treatment. Clinical measurement, GCF and PISF will be collected around the single implant and adjacent teeth, at the following stages (time-point): * Baseline (pre-operative) * After implant placement (prior to the second stage surgery) * After implant exposure (prior to the crown restoration) * 3-month after the implant is restored * Soft tissue will be obtained during the first stage (baseline) and second stage implant surgery (post-operative) and analysed.
Interventions
OTHERMegagen implant placement
Megagen implant with sand-blasted, large-grit, acid-etched (SLA) and nano-calcium ions incorporated surface
OTHERBiomate-Swiss implant
Biomate-Swiss implant with precision dimension laser (PDL) surface
Sponsors
University of Malaya
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
All participants will be blinded from the randomisation. An opaque envelope will be used to conceal the implant designation and will only be revealed to the operator after the site is ready for implant placement. A blinded researcher will be assigned as clinical assessor who will not be involved with the surgical procedure, subject recruitment nor consent taking. An assistant who is not involved with the research will also be asked to re-code the sample tubes to ensure blinding for data/sample analysis.
Intervention model description
Test group: Patient with history of periodontitis Control group: Patient without history of periodontitis Patients in both groups will be randomised to receive one of two type of implants with different surface characteristics.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
1. Specific inclusion criteria for test group: * History of periodontitis but currently stable * Must have successfully completed active periodontal treatment at least 4 months prior to the commencement of study 2. Specific inclusion criteria for control group: * No history of periodontitis, with minimal age-related radiographic bone loss * Reason for losing the tooth/teeth was not due to periodontal problem 3. General inclusion criteria: * Medically healthy * Aged between 30 to 65 years old * Non-smoker, or quit smoking at least 12 months before study commencement * Good oral hygiene (full mouth plaque score (FMPS)\<20%, full mouth bleeding score (FMBS)\<15%) * Indicated for a single implant placement in the posterior region, with adjacent and contralateral natural tooth * Intact inter-cuspal position
Exclusion criteria
* Previous history of dental implant placement * Currently pregnant or intend to be pregnant, and/or lactating mothers * Taking long-term medicines which may affect gingival tissue and oral microbiome, e.g. antibiotics, anticoagulants, anticonvulsants, immunosuppressants and calcium channel blockers.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Level of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-8 expressed in the gingival crevicular and peri-implant sulcular fluids during the early-stage of dental implant placement | From baseline (1st time-point (TP1)) to 1st stage surgery (implant placement - TP2), after 2nd stage surgery (implant exposure (TP3) and 3-months after implant crown restoration (final visit- TP4) | To measure the absolute quantification of MMP-8 level expressed during the implant osseointegration period in all study groups via ELISA method. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Shift of the microbial composition in the supragingival dental plaque, identified via 16S rRNA next generation sequencing | From baseline (1st time-point (TP1)) to 1st stage surgery (implant placement - TP2), after 2nd stage surgery (implant exposure (TP3) approximately 3 months after the 1st stage surgery) and 3-months after implant crown restoration (final visit- TP4) | Identification and comparison of supragingival dental plaque bacteria species/genus and the shift of the bacterial composition during the early-stage of dental implant placement between study groups |
| Shift of proteome profiles in the gingival crevicular and peri-implant sulcular fluids during the early-stage of dental implant placement | From baseline (1st time-point (TP1)) to 1st stage surgery (implant placement - TP2), after 2nd stage surgery (implant exposure (TP3) approximately 3 months after the 1st stage surgery) and 3-months after implant crown restoration (final visit- TP4) | To assess the protein profile and levels of expression of the pro-inflammatory cytokines in GCF and gingival tissue via liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) proteomic analysis following osseointegration. |
| Histological changes in the peri-implant soft tissue before and after implant placement | Between first stage (baseline/pre) and second stage implant surgery (post-operative) at 3 months after the first surgery | Number and co-localisation of cells with MMP-8, pro-inflammatory (M1)- and anti-inflammatory (M2)-related cytokines via hematoxylin and eosin staining, immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence analysis |
| Changes in the clinical parameters during the early-stage implant placement | From baseline (1st time-point (TP1)) to 1st stage surgery (implant placement - TP2), after 2nd stage surgery (implant exposure (TP3) approximately 3 months after the 1st stage surgery) and 3-months after implant crown restoration (final visit- TP4) | To assess intra-oral clinical parameters changes (i.e. patient-level and tooth-level mean periodontal pocket depth (mm) and clinical attachment level (mm); full mouth plaque score (%) and bleeding score (%)) following the first dental implant placement, each time-point (TP). The deeper the depth/higher the level or percentage means the worse the condition is. |
Countries
Malaysia
Outcome results
None listed