Skip to content

Non-inferiority Study of Rituximab Compared to Ocrelizumab in Relapsing MS

Non-inferiority Study of Rituximab Compared to Ocrelizumab in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05834855
Acronym
Noisy Rebels
Enrollment
200
Registered
2023-04-28
Start date
2023-04-30
Completion date
2027-05-31
Last updated
2023-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System, Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNS, Demyelinating Diseases, Multiple Sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, Nervous System Diseases

Keywords

ocrelizumab, rituximab, non-inferiority

Brief summary

Rationale: Ocrelizumab is widely and effectively used to treat relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS). Phase II studies and data from large patient cohorts indicate that rituximab, another anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, is probably equally effective and safe as ocrelizumab in the treatment of RMS. An advantage of rituximab is a considerably lower price. Therefore we will start a study aimed at demonstrating non-inferiority of rituximab compared to ocrelizumab in RMS. If non-inferiority of rituximab can be shown, important reductions in the cost of treatment of RMS will be possible, without loss of efficacy. Objective: Evaluating the efficacy and safety of ritixumab compared to ocrelizumab in the treatmens of RMS. Study design: Randomized double blind multi-centre non-inferiority study of rituximab compared to ocrelizumab in 200 patients with RMS. The trial duration will be 30 months Study population: The study population consists of 200 adult RMS patiens with an indication to start anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody treatment. Intervention: Patients will be randomized 1:1 into the standard group (ocrelizumab treatment) or the experimental group (rituximab treatment). Main study parameters: To conclude non-inferiority of rituximab there will be one primary endpoint: the proportion of patients free of inflammatory disease activity (defined as: new or enlarged T2 lesions) between week 24 (M6) and week 96 (M24) of treatment in each arm. Secondary trial endpoints are presence and number of clinical relapses,T2 and contrast enhancing lesion volumes, brain volume and brain volume changes, disease progression (defined as clinically relevant change on any of the measures: EDSS, T25FW, 9HPT, SDMT), biochemical parameters such as lipidomics and neurofilament light (NfL), immunological parameters, safety as measured by the number of (serious) adverse events ((S)AE), quality of life (EQ-5D-L) and treatment satisfaction (TSQM) and patient reported measures of MS impact (MSIS-29) and well-being (questionnaire on physical complaints) Nature and extent of the burden and risk: Patients included in this study will be treated and monitored by MRI, clinical tests and laboratory tests according to existing protocols and will not be exposed to extra or unknown risks. They will have extra annual questionnaires and larger blood samples at some time points. There is extensive experience with both rituximab and ocrelizumab as efficacious and safe treatments of RMS.

Interventions

DRUGRituximab

Treatment with rituximab

Sponsors

Stichting Treatmeds
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The patient, site personnel administrating infusions, and the treating and evaluating neurologist and study nurse will all be blinded

Intervention model description

Multicenter randomized controlled double-blind non-inferiority trial in The Netherlands

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Men and women aged 18 years and older 2. A diagnosis of relapsing MS according to the 2017 revised diagnostic criteria 3. Indication to start treatment with anti-CD20 therapy according to the treating neurologist and the relevant label in the Netherlands for treatment of relapsing MS 4. Able to understand written and spoken Dutch or English 5. Capable of giving signed informed consent including compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol. 6. Screening EDSS score ≤ 6.5 .

Exclusion criteria

Medical Conditions 1. A known allergy or other intolerability to RTX, OCR, gadolinium-based MRI contrast agents, or corticosteroids. 2. A diagnosis of primary progressive MS according to the diagnostic criteria. 3. A diagnosis of not-active secondary progressive MS. 4. Chronic infectious diseases such as tuberculosis, VZV, hepatitis virus or HIV, as well as hepatitis B surface antigen positivity and/or hepatitis C PCR positivity verified at screening visit. 5. A history of proven inflammatory bowel disease such as M. Crohn or ulcerative colitis 6. Prior or current psychiatric illness, mental deficiency or cognitive dysfunction influencing the patient ability to make an informed consent or comply with the treatment and follow-up phases of this protocol. 7. Cardiac disease that makes treatment with OCR or RTX contra-indicated as stated by the most recent SmPC 8. Active malignancy or prior history of malignancy that makes treatment with OCR or RTX contra-indicated as stated by the most recent SmPC. 9. WBC \< 1.5 x 109/L if not caused by a reversible effect of documented ongoing medication. If caused by a reversible effect of documented ongoing medication the WBC count must be \> 1,5 x 109/L before start of study treatment. 10. Platelet (thrombocyte) count \< 100 x 109/L 11. ALAT and/or ASAT more than 2 times the upper normal reference limit (ULN) 12. Serum creatinine \> 200 μmol/L 13. Serum bilirubin \> ULN 14. Serum IgG \< LLN 15. Pregnant or breast-feeding women 16. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) not able or willing to use highly effective methods of birth control per ICH M3 (R2) that result in failure rate of ≤ 1% per year when used consistently and correctly for the duration of the study OR until 3 months after last dose administered. 17. History of serious or life-threatening infusion reaction to OCR or RTX 18. Treatment with glucocorticoids or ACTH within one month prior to start of study treatment Prior/Concomitant Therapy 19. Previous use of second line MS-therapies cladribine, RTX, alemtuzumab, OCR, ofatumumab, hematopoietic stem cell therapy (HSCT) or other immunosuppression therapies with long lasting effects. Mitoxantrone is allowed if used \> 1 year before enrolment. If any of these medications have been used for indications other than MS, patients can be included if the medications have not been used the year before enrolment. Previous treatment with natalizumab is allowed if the reason to switch was disease activity (so not allowed in for example cases that switch from natalizumab to anti-CD20 therapy because of JCV positivity). 20. Concomitant use of systemic immunosuppressive medication (except corticosteroids for symptomatic treatment of relapses). Prior/Concurrent Clinical Study Experience 21. Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug study, or less than 30 days since ending of another investigational device or drug study (s), or receiving other investigational treatment(s). Patients participating in a purely observational studies will be allowed to participate. Lifestyle 22. Current alcohol or drug dependencies. Diagnostic assessments 23. Presence of metallic objects implanted in the body, that would preclude the ability of the patient to safely have MRI exams. 24. Not willing to undergo MRI scans with i.v. gadolinium injections

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of patients free of inflammatory disease activitybetween month 6 and month 24Proportion of patients with no new or enlarged T2 lesions on brain MRI between month 6 and month 24

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Disability progression during follow-upBaseline, month 6, month 24Disability progression measured on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)
Presence and number of clinical relapsesBaseline, month 6, month 24Clinical relapses during treatment
Contrast enhancing lesionsBaseline, month 6, month 24Proportion of patients with no contrast enhancing lesions on brain MRI
Average number of T2 lesions on brain MRIBaseline, month 6, month 24The average number of new/enlarged T2 lesions between baseline, month 6 and month 24 on brain MRI

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Burden of physical senstations during treatmentBaseline, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24, month 30Burden of physical sensations prior to, after, and between infusions as measured with wearing-off questionnaire and question 5 of the RAPID3-HAQ2 questionnaire
Quality of life questionnairesBaseline, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24, month 30Quality of life as measured by multiple sclerosis impact scale-29 (MSIS-29)
Treatment satisfactionBaseline, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24, month 30Treatment satisfaction as measured with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire Measurement (TSQM)
Lymphocytes30 monthsAbsolute numbers of different lymphocyte subsets prior to infusion during 30 months of treatment
Neurofilament30 monthsSerum levels of neurofilament during 30 months of treatment
Anti-drug antibodies30 monthsProportion of patients with anti-drug-antibodies during 30 months of treatment
Dynamics of B-cell repopulationBaseline, week 2, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24, month 30B-cell count (thousand/ml) (normal range: 100-300 thousand/ml)
Dynamics of ocrelizumab drug concentrationsBaseline, week 2, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24, month 30Dynamics of ocrelizumab drug concentrations (microgram/mL)
ImmunoglobulinsBaseline, week 2, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24, month 30Serum levels of immunoglobulins
Serum levels30 monthsSerum levels of chemokines and cytokines, protectins, resolvins, maresins, and lipoxins during 30 months of treatment
Dynamics of B-cell depletionBaseline, week 2, month 6, month 12, month 18, month 24, month 30B-cell count (thousand/ml) (normal range: 100-300 thousand/ml)
Infusion reactions30 monthsProportion of patients with immediate and delayed infusion reactions during 30 months of treatment
Infections30 monthsProportion of patients with infections during 30 months of treatment
Malignancies30 monthsProportion of patients with malignancies during 30 months of treatment
Adverse events30 monthsProportion of patients with any SAE/SAR and AESI during 30 months of treatment

Countries

Netherlands

Contacts

Primary ContactLisa Schoof, Msc
l.g.schoof@amsterdamumc.nl650087853
Backup ContactEva Strijbis, Dr.
e.strijbis@amsterdamumc.nl204442182

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026