Skip to content

BARBED vs. STANDARD Suture for Colporrhaphy at the End of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy

Barbed Versus Standard Suture for Vaginal Cuff Closure After Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05833204
Acronym
BARD
Enrollment
1614
Registered
2023-04-27
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
2028-12-31
Last updated
2026-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Vaginal Cuff Complications

Keywords

Laparoscopy, Hysterectomy, Vaginal cuff closure, Barbed sutures, Vaginal cuff complications, Vaginal cuff dehiscence

Brief summary

Hysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures performed worldwide, with more than 400,000 hysterectomies performed annually in the United States. As a consequence, even uncommon complications can affect large numbers of patients. Among potentially life-threatening events, vaginal cuff dehiscence complicates 0.14-1.38% of procedures, and any vaginal cuff complications (dehiscence, hematoma, bleeding, infection) are estimated to affect 4.7-9.8% of patients. In this scenario, any preventive strategy can provide clinically relevant benefits. Regarding colporrhaphy, only the adoption of a laparoscopic approach instead of a vaginal approach is supported by high-quality evidence. Our group demonstrated that the laparoscopic closure of the vaginal cuff after total laparoscopic hysterectomy reduces the incidence of vaginal cuff complications. Among other potentially effective interventions, the use of barbed sutures was associated with a lower incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence than the standard suture. In a recent meta-analysis, the use of barbed sutures has been associated with a pooled incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence of 0.4% versus 2% after a traditional vaginal suture. However, this evidence is limited because most pooled studies were retrospective, and only two were randomized controlled trials. Moreover, these two randomized controlled trials had a very small sample size and were not powered to detect clinically relevant differences. On that basis, despite the promising utility of barbed sutures for vaginal cuff closure after total laparoscopic hysterectomy, the choice of the type of suture is not evidence-based but still guided by personal opinions, as well as by the preference and habits of the operators. Therefore, this study aims to investigate whether the laparoscopic vaginal cuff closure with barbed suture determines a lower incidence of vaginal cuff dehiscence and complications than conventional sutures after total laparoscopic hysterectomy.

Interventions

PROCEDURELaparoscopic colporrhaphy with 0-caliber barbed absorbable suture

After the total laparoscopic hysterectomy, the colporrhaphy will be performed using a 0-caliber barbed absorbable suture (V-Loc ™, Covidien, Medtronic)

PROCEDURELaparoscopic colporrhaphy with standard 0-caliber absorbable suture

After the total laparoscopic hysterectomy, the colporrhaphy will be performed using a 0-caliber absorbable suture made of a coated braided thread (Vicryl; Ethicon Inc, Sommerville, NJ)

Sponsors

Universita di Verona
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The surgeon will not be blinded. Conversely, patients and co-investigators who will assess study outcomes and perform patients' follow-ups will be masked regarding the allocation arm until the study's conclusion.

Intervention model description

Multicenter, parallel arms, open-label, randomized controlled trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing elective total laparoscopic hysterectomy * Surgery performed for the treatment of benign pathology * Age \> 18 years * Surgery performed by laparoscopy * Signature of informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing emergent surgery * Patients candidates for hysterectomy for oncological indication * Patients who underwent previous radiation therapy * Patients allergic to the suture material used in the study * Patients unable to express adequate informed consent to participate in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vaginal cuff dehiscence30 days after surgeryAny partial or total separation of the vaginal cuff

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vaginal cuff complications30 days after surgeryHematoma, abscess, infections, bleeding, resuture of the vaginal cuff
Hospital stayFrom the date of hospital admission to the date of hospital discharge.Days of hospitalization from the day of admission to the day of discharge.
Operative timeDuring surgeryTime between first incision and skin closure
Intraoperative blood lossDuring surgeryTotal blood aspirate during the surgical procedure
30-day post-surgical morbidity30 days after surgeryPerioperative (intraoperative and postoperative) complications graded based on the Clavien-Dindo classification
Quality of life index90 days after surgeryThe Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) investigates 8 different health aspects. Physical activity, role and physical health, role and emotional state, and mental health are measured by two questions. The SF-12 scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical and mental health functioning.
Sexual function90 days after surgeryThe female sexual function index (FSFI) consists of 19 multiple-choice items that assess female sexual functioning based on 6 domains: desire, arousal, orgasm, pain, sexual satisfaction, and lubrication. The total score ranges from 0 to 36, with 26.55 as the cut-off suggesting the presence of sexual dysfunction. The higher the score, the better the sexual function.

Countries

Italy

Contacts

CONTACTStefano Uccella, MD, PhD
stefano.uccella@univr.it0039 045 812 2720
CONTACTSimone Garzon, MD
simone.garzon@univr.it0039 045 812 2720
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORStefano Uccella, MD, PhD

Universita di Verona

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSimone Garzon, MD

Universita di Verona

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPier Carlo Zorzato, MD

Universita di Verona

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 30, 2026