Skip to content

Cool vs Room-temperature Artificial Tears

Randomized Controlled Study of Cooled Versus Room-Temperature Artificial Tears for Reducing Surface Irritation Following Intravitreal Injection

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05832996
Enrollment
124
Registered
2023-04-27
Start date
2022-03-01
Completion date
2022-07-06
Last updated
2025-03-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Central Retinal Vein Occlusion With Macular Edema, Cystoid Macular Edema, Diabetic Retinopathy With Macular Edema of Both Eyes (Diagnosis), Dry Eye Sensation, Exudative Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Unspecified Eye, Eye Pain, Ocular Surface Disease

Brief summary

Background and Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of cooled versus room temperature artificial tears in reducing post intravitreal injection (IVI) ocular discomfort. Patients and Methods: Patients receiving IVI were randomized to either cooled or room temperature tears intervention groups. Both groups rated their ocular discomfort following IVI before intervention and again after administration of cooled or room temperature tears.

Interventions

DRUGRefresh Plus Preservative-free Lubricant Eye Drops

Refresh Plus Preservative-free Lubricant Eye Drops at either 4 or 25 degree Celsius

Sponsors

University of Iowa
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 105 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients were eligible if they were receiving standard intravitreal injections for their exudative age-related macular degeneration, cystoid macular edema, diabetic macular edema, proliferative diabetic retinopathy, retinal vein occlusion with macular edema, or retinal neovascularization.

Exclusion criteria

* Inability or lack of willingness to participate in the study * Active ocular infection including infectious uveitis * First time receiving intravitreal injection * Those who reported never having ocular discomfort following intravitreal injections on the pre-injection questionnaire * Less than 18 years of age

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Efficacy of Cooled Versus Room Temperature Artificial Tears in Reducing Post Intravitreal Injection Ocular Discomfort as Measured by Pain Scale Survey.with 72 hours of the interventionThe level of subjectively reported pain scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is minimal pain and 10 is extreme pain

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cooled Artificial Tear Group
Stored at 4 degree Celsius Refresh Plus Preservative-free Lubricant Eye Drops: Refresh Plus Preservative-free Lubricant Eye Drops at 4 degree Celsius
48
Room Temperature Artificial Tear Group
Stored at 25 degree Celsius Refresh Plus Preservative-free Lubricant Eye Drops: Refresh Plus Preservative-free Lubricant Eye Drops at 4 degree Celsius
61
Total109

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRoom Temperature Artificial Tear GroupTotalCooled Artificial Tear Group
Age, Continuous68.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4
68.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.7
69.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.9
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
59 Participants106 Participants47 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
45 Participants77 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants32 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 480 / 61
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 480 / 61
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 480 / 61

Outcome results

Primary

The Efficacy of Cooled Versus Room Temperature Artificial Tears in Reducing Post Intravitreal Injection Ocular Discomfort as Measured by Pain Scale Survey.

The level of subjectively reported pain scale from 1 to 10, where 1 is minimal pain and 10 is extreme pain

Time frame: with 72 hours of the intervention

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cooled Artificial Tear GroupThe Efficacy of Cooled Versus Room Temperature Artificial Tears in Reducing Post Intravitreal Injection Ocular Discomfort as Measured by Pain Scale Survey.2.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2
Room Temperature Artificial Tear GroupThe Efficacy of Cooled Versus Room Temperature Artificial Tears in Reducing Post Intravitreal Injection Ocular Discomfort as Measured by Pain Scale Survey.1.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.2

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026