Skip to content

Effects of Core Stability Exercises and Cognitive Tasks on Chronic Non-specific Back Pain

Effects of Core Stability Exercises and Cognitive Tasks Compared to General Exercises and Cognitive Tasks on Chronic Non-specific Back Pain

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05832918
Enrollment
48
Registered
2023-04-27
Start date
2023-05-02
Completion date
2025-12-15
Last updated
2025-05-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

Keywords

Low back pain, Disability, Postural control, Core Stability Exercise, cognitive task

Brief summary

This randomized control trial study aims to compare the effect of core stability exercises and cognitive tasks with general exercises and cognitive tasks on pain, disability, and postural control strategies of chronic non-specific low back pain patients. The main questions are: 1. Are core stability exercises and cognitive tasks more effective than general exercises and cognitive tasks in reducing the pain of chronic non-specific low back pain patients? 2. Are core stability exercises and cognitive tasks more effective than general exercises and cognitive tasks in reducing the disability of chronic non-specific low back pain patients? 3. Are core stability exercises and cognitive tasks more effective than general exercises and cognitive tasks in improving postural stability parameters of chronic non-specific low back pain patients? 4. Are core stability exercises and cognitive tasks more effective than general exercises and cognitive tasks in improving stabilogram diffusion analysis parameters of chronic non-specific low back pain patients? This study is designed to apply two exercise protocols on two groups of 17 people with non-specific back pain. Group A will receive core stability exercises along with cognitive tasks, and group B will receive general exercises along with cognitive tasks.

Detailed description

Patients will be aged between 18-50 years. All patients meeting the inclusion criteria will receive 16 training sessions (thrice a week). The primary outcome measure will be pain and disability. Secondary outcome measures will be postural control strategies (including postural control stability and stabilogram diffusion analysis), quality of life, fear of movement, and fear-avoidance beliefs that will be assessed before and after training sessions and at 3-month follow-up; only primary outcomes will be evaluated in each group.

Interventions

OTHERexercise therapy

Exercise therapy is one of the rehabilitation methods that is defined as a regimen or plan of physical activities designed and prescribed to facilitate the patient's recovery from diseases and any conditions which disturb their movement and activity of daily life or maintain a state of well-being through neuro re-education, gait training, and therapeutic exercises.

Sponsors

Iran University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Orthopedist-confirmed diagnosis of chronic nonspecific low back pain that has lasted at least three months since its onset. * Pain score of 3 or more on a visual analog scale. * Pain during quiet standing. * Cognitive level above 24 based on mini-mental state examination (MMSE).

Exclusion criteria

* Radicular pain and any neurological signs. * Uncorrected vision impairment. * Hearing problems. * Vestibular dysfunctions. * Cognitive deficit. * Previous spinal surgery. * Severe deformity or injury to the lower extremities.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Oswestry Disability IndexBaseline (pre-intervention), change from baseline immediately after the intervention at five weeks , change from baseline at three months Questionnaire evaluating the level of disability. Total score range from 0-100 (higher scores mean more disability)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
COP sway range for mediolateral (MA range)Baseline (pre-intervention), change from baseline immediately after the intervention at five weeks MA range is one kind of COP displacement evaluation method characterized as traditional linear measures for evaluating postural control stability.
COP sway velocityBaseline (pre-intervention), change from baseline immediately after the intervention at five weeks COP sway velocity is one kind of COP displacement evaluation method characterized as traditional linear measures for evaluating postural control stability.
Sway areaBaseline (pre-intervention), change from baseline immediately after the intervention at five weeks Sway area is one kind of COP displacement evaluation method characterized as traditional linear measures for evaluating postural control stability.
Short-term diffusion coefficient of stabilogram diffusion plotBaseline (pre-intervention), change from baseline immediately after the intervention at five weeks The short-term diffusion coefficient is the slope of the open-loop part of the stabilogram diffusion plot, indicating stochastic activity in open loop control phase in a quiet standing position.
Long-term diffusion coefficient of stabilogram diffusion plotBaseline (pre-intervention), change from baseline immediately after the intervention at five weeks The long-term diffusion coefficient is the slope of the close loop part of the stabilogram diffusion plot, indicating stochastic activity in the immediate loop control phase in the quiet standing position.
Center of pressure (COP) sway range for anteroposterior (AP range)Baseline (pre-intervention), change from baseline immediately after the intervention at five weeks AP range is one kind of COP displacement evaluation method characterized as traditional linear measures for evaluating postural control stability.
12-item short form health surveyBaseline (pre-intervention), change from baseline immediately after the intervention at five weeks Questionnaire evaluating the quality of life. Total score range from 0-100 (higher scores mean better quality of life)
Tampa scale for kinesiophobiaBaseline (pre-intervention), change from baseline immediately after the intervention at five weeks Questionnaire evaluating the kinesiophobia because of feeling re-injury. Total score range from 17-68 (higher scores mean more kinesiophobia)
Fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaireBaseline (pre-intervention), change from baseline immediately after the intervention at five weeks Questionnaire evaluating fear of pain and consequent avoidance of physical activity because of their fear. Total score range from 0-66 (higher scores mean more fear of pain)
Visual analog scaleBaseline (pre-intervention), change from baseline immediately after the intervention at five weeks , change from baseline at three months Questionnaire evaluating pain intensity. Total score range from 0-10 (higher scores mean more pain)
Critical point coordinates.Baseline (pre-intervention), change from baseline immediately after the intervention at five weeks Critical point coordinates are the estimated values of the time intervals and mean square displacements defining the stabilogram-diffusion critical points (the point that open-loop control changed to close loop control)

Countries

Iran

Contacts

Primary ContactZeinab Raoufi
zraoofi93@gmail.com00982122222059
Backup ContactReza Salehi
Salehi.re@iums.ac.ir00982122222059

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026