Exercise Performance, Gastrointestinal Symptoms
Conditions
Brief summary
Bovine colostrum is a dairy food and the first milk produced by the mother cow. Abundant research exists revealing the valuable health benefits it confers due to its unique nutritional properties., including benefits to gastrointestinal health, fitness, and overall well-being.This study aims to test a specific food-grade supplement, ARMRA Colostrum Immune Revival, over a 12-week trial to better understand the well-being, fitness, and gut benefits. This trial will use two groups, one that suffers from gastrointestinal complaints frequently and another that exercises at least three days a week.
Interventions
DRUGARMRA™ Bovine Colostrum
Participants have the option to choose between unflavoured ARMRA™ Bovine Colostrum or blood orange flavoured ARMRA™ Bovine Colostrum. Participants took 2 sachets (1g each) of the product mixed with a cold drink daily for 12 weeks.
Sponsors
Citruslabs
Armra
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
Multiarm study, both arms receiving the same intervention drug.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Male or Female between 18-65 years of age. * Self-reported digestive issues (abdominal pain, gas production, bloating after meals, or heartburn after meals) (GUT HEALTH GROUP ONLY) * Must be physically active three or more days a week and willing to maintain their current activity level (PERFORMANCE GROUP ONLY) * Must be willing to refrain from lifestyle changes affecting their gastrointestinal tract. * Must be in good health with no significant chronic conditions. * Following a stable, consistent diet regimen. * Have a reliable way to measure their weight.
Exclusion criteria
* Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding * Suffers from pre-existing conditions that would prevent them from adhering to the protocol. * Has a lactose allergy or intolerance. * Serious food allergies
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in overall well-being [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12] | 12 weeks | Well-being will be measured via study-specific surveys. Data was collected using a textual 5 or 6-point Likert scale for each question, such as Not noticeable to severe. Symptom-related questions were conducted at baseline and each check-in. The textual Likert data was transformed into numerical values of 1-6, with 1 representing the least favorable/worse outcome (severe response to the question, how severe would you rate your stress), and 6 representing the most beneficial response (i.e., no symptoms to the question, how severe would you rate your stress). |
| Change in hs-CRP [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12] | 12 weeks | Biomarker assessment will be completed to assess changes in hs-CRP. Participants will complete a finger-prick dried blood spot test, at Baseline and Week 12. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in self-reported gastrointestinal outcomes, such as bloating, heartburn, irregular bowel movements, and gas [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12] | 12 weeks | In the Gut Health Group only: Assessed via self-reported gastrointestinal outcomes such as bloating, heartburn, irregular bowel movements, and gas. Data was collected using a textual 5 or 6-point Likert scale for each question, such as Not noticeable to severe. Symptom-related questions were conducted at baseline and each check-in. The textual Likert data was transformed into numerical values of 1-6, with 1 representing the least favorable/worse outcome (severe response to the question, how severe would you rate your stress), and 6 representing the most beneficial response (i.e., no symptoms to the question, how severe would you rate your stress). |
| Change in recovery and fitness levels [Time Frame: Baseline to Week 12] | 12 weeks | In the Exercise Performance Group only: Assessed via self-reported questionnaires. Data was collected using a textual 5 or 6-point Likert scale for each question, such as Not noticeable to severe. Symptom-related questions were conducted at baseline and each check-in. The textual Likert data was transformed into numerical values of 1-6, with 1 representing the least favorable/worse outcome (severe response to the question, how severe would you rate your stress), and 6 representing the most beneficial response (i.e., no symptoms to the question, how severe would you rate your stress). |
Countries
United States
Outcome results
None listed