Skip to content

Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Oligoprogressive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer, Melanoma, and Renal Cell Carcinoma

Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial of Biologically Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Oligoprogressive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Melanoma, and Renal Cell Carcinoma

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05830058
Enrollment
32
Registered
2023-04-26
Start date
2023-11-29
Completion date
2027-02-03
Last updated
2026-08-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma, Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Melanoma, Renal Cell Carcinoma

Brief summary

This phase II trial tests the safety of positron emission tomography (PET) guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and how well it works to treat non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that has up to 5 sites of progression (oligoprogression) compared to standard SBRT. SBRT uses special equipment to position a patient and deliver radiation to tumors with high precision. This method may kill tumor cells with fewer doses over a shorter period and cause less damage to normal tissue. A PET scan is an imaging test that looks at your tissues and organs using a small amount of a radioactive substance. It also checks for cancer and may help find cancer remaining in areas already treated. Using a PET scan for SBRT planning may help increase the dose of radiation given to the most resistant part of the cancer in patients with oligoprogressive NSCLC, melanoma, and RCC.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: I. PET adaptive SBRT is both feasible and safe and allows for a higher total dose of radiation through an inter-fraction simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) based on inter-fraction PET uptake, leading to improved local control outcomes compared to current standard SBRT planning without a SIB. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Determine the duration of local and distant control followed PET adaptive SBRT treatment compared to standard external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). II. Evaluate the utility of measuring circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) (ctDNA) before, during and after SBRT in conjuction with biological imaging to assess early disease response. III. Identify genomic predictors to predict for distant progression. IV. Determine durability of current systemic therapy with SBRT to oligoprogressive sites. EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES: I. Biomarker changes based on ctDNA before, during and after treatment. II. Changes in fludeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake with SBRT and combined checkpoint inhibitor during and after treatment and correlation with local and distant control. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms. ARM I: Patients undergo 5 SBRT treatments every other day on study. Patients also undergo computed tomography (CT) or PET/CT and blood collection throughout study. ARM II: Patients undergo 3 SBRT treatments every other day week 1, undergo PET/CT and replanning one month post SBRT, then undergo 2 additional treatments with SIB on study. Patients also undergo CT or PET/CT and blood collection throughout study.

Interventions

PROCEDUREBiospecimen Collection

Undergo blood collection

PROCEDUREComputed Tomography

Undergo CT or PET/CT

PROCEDUREPositron Emission Tomography

Undergo PET

OTHERQuestionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

RADIATIONStereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Undergo SBRT

Sponsors

City of Hope Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Documented informed consent of the participant and/or legally authorized representative * Assent, when appropriate, will be obtained per institutional guidelines * Agreement to allow the use of archival tissue from diagnostic tumor biopsies * If unavailable, exceptions may be granted with study principal investigator (PI) approval * Age: \>= 18 years * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) =\< 2 * Histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC with 1-5 sites of disease progression while on or following systemic therapy with a checkpoint inhibitor with or without chemotherapy for at least 3 months with radiographic evidence of progression based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) or Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) * Lesion(s) must all be amenable to SBRT which will be determined by the radiation oncologists. Active lesions should be a minimum size of \>= 1 cm * Primary tumor should be controlled for \> 3 months in the metachronous setting; for synchronouos progression of the primary and oligoprogressive site(s), the primary should be treated with curative/local control intent * Patients eligible for the study must have at least one lesion for which the planned radiation dose achieves a biologic effective dose (BED) \< 100 (alpha/beta = 10) due to organs at risk and dose constraints * If the clinical scenario deem that other forms of local therapy may be more suitable for the metastatic disease, such as surgical resection and interventional radiology-guided ablation, patients would be able to undergo other forms of local therapy after discussion with the study PI but at least one lesion must be treated with SBRT in this scenario * Patients with brain metastases can be included but brain metastases must be treated prior to enrollment and are not considered as a site of oligoprogression * Life expectancy \>= 3 months in the opinion of the treating investigators

Exclusion criteria

* Judgement by the investigator that the patient is unsuitable to participate in the study and the patient is unlikely to comply with study procedures, restrictions, and requirements * Those not eligible for SBRT after review by a radiation oncologist * Unable to undergo a Pet/CT or do not have Pet active disease * Pregnant and/or breastfeeding women are excluded from this study as these agents may have the potential for teratogenic or abortifacient effects. Female patients of childbearing potentially must have a negative urine or serum pregnancy test within 72 hours prior to receiving therapy * Prospective participants who, in the opinion of the investigator, may not be able to comply with all study procedures (including compliance issues related to feasibility/logistics)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility and safety of positron emission tomography (PET) adaptive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)At completion of SBRT up to 5 weeksFeasibility and safety of biologically-guided adaptive planning based on the standardized uptake value (SUV) on pre-treatment and inter-fraction FDG-PET/CT to guide SBRT dose-escalation with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) delivered to areas of higher activity in patients with oligoprogressive (1-5 sites) disease when compared to the current standard SBRT planning without inter-fraction adaptive planning, with the goal of demonstrating that PET-adaptive inter-fraction planning can improve total dose delivered over the course of treatment. We will be measuring the difference in total radiation dose in Gy between the two arms with the goal of achieving an absolute dose of 10 Gy or higher.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to progressionUp to 12 monthsDefined as time of randomization to disease progression at any site or death. Assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST).
Time to next systemic therapyUp to 12 months
Overall survivalUp to 12 months
Quality of life (QOL)Up to 12 monthsPatient reported outcomes using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - G. Baseline changes in reported QOL will be summarized. Repeated QOL assessments will be tabulated and graphically displayed to describe the changes of QOL outcomes over time, no formal hypothesis testing is planned. An evaluation by dose, response and other characteristics may also be considered. For quantitative QOL scales, data will be represented using means/ medians, histogram/ boxplots. The area under curve will be used as a summary score for each patient. These can then be averaged across groups for informal assessment. Standard imputation methods will be used to deal with a large proportion of missing data.
Incidence of adverse eventsAt 3, 6, and 12 months following radiation therapyClinician documented toxicity using common terminology for adverse events version 5.
Local control ratesUp to 12 monthsAssessed using the mRECIST.
Dose deliveredUp to 12 monthsDefined as the dose delivered in the experimental group for the first 3 fractions versus the dose given for the last 2 fractions.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORArya Amini

City of Hope Medical Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 1, 2026