Skip to content

Intravenous Administration of Magnesium Sulfate in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Cases

The Effect of Intravenous Magnesium Sulfate Use on Intraoperative Remifentanil Consumption and Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Cases

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05826119
Acronym
MgSO4
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-04-24
Start date
2024-01-20
Completion date
2024-06-15
Last updated
2025-12-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Laparoscopic Hysterectomy, Magnesium Sulfate, General Anesthesia

Keywords

intravenous magnesium sulfate, lararoscopic hysterectomy

Brief summary

In our study, it was aimed to show the contribution of intraoperative intravenous magnesium sulfate administration to peroperative opioid consumption and postoperative analgesia.

Detailed description

Postsurgical pain is one of the most important issues that could impress on postoperative peace and comfort. Laparoscopic hysterectomy associated with intense inflammatory response, resulting in moderate to severe postoperative pain perception The major goal in postoperative pain management is to minimize the dose of medications and lessen side effects, while still providing adequate analgesia. Postoperative pain relief leads to earlier mobilization, shortened hospital staying, reduced hospital costs, and increased patient satisfaction Narcotics are the most common analgesics which are used after the surgeries. But anesthetists are always looking for replaceable methods with fewer side effects and cost . It seems adjuvant analgesics are those desirable replacements. Nowadays there have been many debates on the role of adjuvant analgesics on postoperative pain relief. One way to use adjuvant analgesics is preventive method Preventive analgesia is a method initiated before anesthetic procedure in order to reduce the physiological consequences of nociceptive stimulation and medical adverse effects and has been defined as an antinociceptive treatment that prevents establishment of altered central processing of afferent input from injuries. One of the intravenous adjuvant that has been shown potential in preventive analgesia is magnesium sulfate that could be administered with multiple routes or methods Mg has been used for many years in anesthesia and cardiology as an anticonvulsant or antiarrhythmic drug. The mechanism of the analgesic effect of Mg is not clear but interference with calcium channels and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor seem to play an important role. It seems that analgesic mechanism of NMDA-antagonists is made by preventing nociceptive central sensitization. Another suggesting mechanism is the role of it on reduction of catecholamine release with sympathetic stimulation, thereby decreasing peripheral nociception or the stress response to the surgery. Data illustrate that the NMDA receptor antagonists like Mg sulfate have an effect on pain threshold and could prevent pain perception even with low doses (preventive doses) In our study, investigators aimed to determine the contribution of magnesium sulfate to postoperative analgesia in abdominal hysterectomy by considering its mechanism of action. The patients were divided into two groups as magnesium sulfate administered and non-administered The magnesium group received a bolus of 20 mg/kg of magnesium sulfate in 100 mL of saline for 15 minutes before induction, followed by a continuous infusion of 20 mg/kg/hr until the skin was closed. The same volume of isotonic saline for the control group was administered as indicated in the magnesium group.

Interventions

Anesthesia induction was provided with propofol (2mg/kg), fentanyl (2mcg/kg). Intubation was performed after administration of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium with an appropriate endotracheal tube. Anesthesia was maintained using AIR/O2 (50%/50%), 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane, 0.1-0.25 mcg/kg/min remifentanil infusion. The target BIS value was kept between 40 and 50. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) \<90mmHg or \<20% of baseline was considered hypotension; remifentanil infusion was reduced. If no response was obtained, 5-10 mg of IV ephedrine was administered. HR \< 45 beats/min was evaluated as bradycardia; IV atropine 0.5 mg was planned The magnesium group received a bolus of 20 mg/kg of magnesium sulfate in 100 mL of saline for 15 minutes prior to induction, followed by a continuous infusion of 20 mg/kg/hr until skin closure.

DRUGPlacebo

Anesthesia induction was provided with propofol (2mg/kg), fentanyl (2mcg/kg). Intubation was performed after administration of 0.6 mg/kg rocuronium with an appropriate endotracheal tube. Anesthesia was maintained using AIR/O2 (50%/50%), 1 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane, 0.1-0.25 mcg/kg/min remifentanil infusion. The target BIS value was kept between 40 and 50. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) \<90mmHg or \<20% of baseline was considered hypotension; remifentanil infusion was reduced. If no response was obtained, 5-10 mg of IV ephedrine was administered. HR \< 45 beats/min was evaluated as bradycardia; IV atropine 0.5 mg was planned The same volume of isotonic saline for the control group was administered as indicated in the magnesium group.

Sponsors

Ondokuz Mayıs University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

The patients were randomly divided into two groups according to a 1:1 randomization ratio using opaque sealed envelopes before surgery. Study randomization was performed using computer generated randomization codes by SPSS v23.0 (IBM, New York, USA). Each patient was asked to choose an envelope and the patients were assigned to the study according to the group specified in the envelope. The drugs to be used were prepared 30 minutes before the surgery by the nurse who did not participate in the study in the drug preparation room. Everyone involved in this study, including patients, researchers, the anesthesiologist responsible for anesthesia management, and the surgeon, remained blind to group distribution during the study.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
20 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patient undergoing abdominal hysterectomy * Between the ages of 20-70, * ASA I- II

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of hepatic and renal dysfunction, * Presence of cardiac arrhythmia or other cardiac comorbidity, * Neurological and psychiatric disorder, * Chronic use of calcium and beta blockers, * Drug or alcohol abuse, * Pregnancy and lactation status, * Patients with a history of allergy to any drug included in the study protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fentanyl consumption in the first 24 hours after surgeryPostoperative Day 1Fentanyl consumption in the first 24 hours was measured. Patients were able to request opioids via a PCA device when their VAS score is above 4 at rest and during activity (coughing and walking).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-operative acute painPostoperative Day 1Pain status at rest and while activity (coughing and walking) was assessed by VAS scores at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 hours after surgery. The VAS is an 11-point numeric scale which ranges from 0 to 10 at rest and during activity.
The incidences of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV)Postoperative Day 1The severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) was assessed using a Verbal Descriptive Scale(VDS) at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24, hours after surgery. If a score of 3 or more is recorded, ondansetron 0,1 mg/kg iv was administered.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026