Skip to content

What is Optimal Post-operative Prophylactic Therapy in Irradiated Breasts Undergoing Repeat Surgery

What is Optimal Post-operative Prophylactic Therapy in Irradiated Breasts Undergoing Repeat Oncologic Surgery to Reduce Early Wound Complications

Status
Terminated
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05823467
Enrollment
4
Registered
2023-04-21
Start date
2023-06-26
Completion date
2026-07-01
Last updated
2026-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

radiation, breast conservation surgery, recurrent breast cancer, wound VAC, postoperative antibiotics, post operative wound complications, repeat breast surgery

Brief summary

This study will look at whether females who have previously had breast surgery and radiation and are undergoing repeat breast surgery require any post operative interventions. The reason the investigators are conducting this study is because females who have undergone breast radiation are at higher risk of wound complications following breast surgery. The investigators will randomize recruited female participants into three arms, one which is post operative antibiotics for one week, one which is a wound VAC, and one which is no intervention. The investigators goal is to identify whether these patients will require any postoperative interventions.

Detailed description

Background: The 10-year local recurrence rate for breast cancer following breast conserving surgery (BCS) and radiation therapy (RT) is estimated around 19% for which the standard of care is completion mastectomy. This represents a growing population of patients with prior irradiation undergoing repeat oncologic surgery. Patients undergoing surgery after RT have been shown to be at higher risk for wound complications such as surgical site infection (SSI), dehiscence, and skin necrosis. The average rate of SSI following major breast surgery is estimated at 5%, whereas it has been reported over 30% in irradiated patients. However, the data remains sparse dedicated to mitigating early wound complications in this patient population with guidelines or recommendations that exist for prophylactic measures. A retrospectively review analyzed SSI rate in patients undergoing mastectomy without reconstruction and found a statistically significant reduction in SSI rate with post-operative antibiotics in the subset of patients with previous RT (30.8% to 3.6%). In another study of a prospectively followed cohort of high-risk patients undergoing breast cancer surgery, a subset of whom had previous RT, these patients were found to have a significant reduction from 45% to 4% for all wound complications (no reported SSI) with closed incision negative pressure wound therapy (ciNPT) and post-operative antibiotics. Therefore, the investigators hypothesize that patients with prior BCS and RT undergoing repeat oncologic breast surgery would benefit from post-operative prophylactic therapy to reduce early wound complications. Retrospective analyses and prospective cohort studies have demonstrated potential benefit; however, a high quality RCT is warranted to analyze our research question. Study Design: The investigator's primary objective will be to evaluate the effect of a 7-day course of TMP-SMX DS and 7-day application of ciNPT dressing (PICO) on the rate of early wound complications in this patient population. This study will be designed as an unblinded block randomized controlled trial with three arms: 1) standard of care 2) post-operative antibiotics 3) ciNPT. Participants will be recruited by surgeons at the Meadowlark and Sturgeon surgical clinics. Data will be collected via paper forms or Connect Care at 1-2 week and 4-6 week post-operative visits. The primary outcome measure will be wound complications (SSI, dehiscence, skin necrosis). Secondary outcomes will include adverse effects of antibiotics or ciNPT therapy, and other post-operative complications (extended antibiotic therapy, re-operation, admission to hospital). Impact: The investigators hope the results of this trial will demonstrate benefit of prophylactic antibiotics and/or ciNPT to decrease wound complications in this patient population. This will have the potential to create recommendations for a post-operative prophylactic regimen to inform future guidelines and practice in oncologic breast surgery.

Interventions

DRUGTMP-SMX DS

Oral Antibiotic - used to treat post operative wound infections.

DEVICEciNPT dressing

Negative pressure wound VAC placed on incision post operatively.

Sponsors

University of Alberta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

This study will randomize patients to three arms - patients will either be randomized to post operative antibiotic arm (1 week), post operative wound VAC arm (1 week), or no intervention.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Female * \> 18 years of age * Previous breast surgery and ipsilateral breast irradiation * Requiring repeat breast surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Male * \<18 years of age, * Currently on antibiotic therapy for other indications * Known hypersensitivity to trimethoprim or sulfonamides, * History of drug-induced immune thrombocytopenia with use of trimethoprim and/or sulfonamides * Documented megaloblastic anemia due to folate deficiency * Currently pregnant or breastfeeding, and * Marked hepatic damage * Severe renal insufficiency * Severe sensitivity or allergy to silicone adhesive

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Wound ComplicationPost operative day 14 during follow up visitAssessment of rate of Wound complication with each intervention arm, immediately after intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adverse effects from intervention armpost procedure from post operative day 1 - post operative day 30Will assess for any adverse reaction from each intervention as well as repeat hospital visit within 30 days (after the procedure and intervention)

Countries

Canada

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAzadeh Rajaee, MD

University of Alberta

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 21, 2026