Partial Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears
Conditions
Keywords
partial thickness, bursal side, rotator cuff, full thickness, subacromial bursa
Brief summary
The investigators aimed to compare the results of acromioplasty + arthroscopic debridement and acromioplasty + augmentation with subacromial bursa.
Interventions
PROCEDUREAugmentation with subacromial bursa + acromioplasty
Two intervention was planned. Rotator cuff debridement + acromioplasty group is mentioned as Group A (18 patients) and augmentation with subacromial bursa + acromioplasty is Group B
PROCEDURERotator cuff debridement + acromioplasty
Two intervention was planned. Rotator cuff debridement + acromioplasty group is mentioned as Group A (18 patients) and augmentation with subacromial bursa + acromioplasty is Group B
Sponsors
Prof. Dr. Cemil Tascıoglu Education and Research Hospital Organization
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* bursal side rotator cuff tears in MRI sections * Patients whose pain does not go away despite NSAIDs and standardized physical therapy by the same physiotherapist applied for 3 months * 25-50% or 3-6 mm rotator cuff tear (Ellman grade 2) on the bursal side
Exclusion criteria
* Previous surgery * tears greater than 50% or 6 mm
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of biological augmentation with bursa using postoperative clinical scores and MRI. | 18 months | Our Primary Outcome Measure is to investigate the effects of biological augmentation with subacromial bursa in arthroscopic bursal-sided partial thickness rotator cuff repair with postoperative MRI and functional scores with Constant-Murley and Ases scores. |
Countries
Turkey (Türkiye)
Outcome results
None listed