Skip to content

Differences in ECG- vs. proLonged cardIac MonItor-DeTected Atrial Fibrillation in STROKE Patients (DELIMIT AF-STROKE)

Differences in ECG- vs. proLonged cardIac MonItor-DeTected Atrial Fibrillation in STROKE Patients

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05822791
Enrollment
366
Registered
2023-04-21
Start date
2023-05-01
Completion date
2027-10-20
Last updated
2026-09-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation, Stroke, TIA

Brief summary

The present study is an investigator-initiated, single-center, retrospective study based on data from the London Ontario Stroke Registry (LOSR), aiming to compare the characteristics and outcomes of ECG-detected and Device-Detected atrial fibrillation in patients with ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack.

Detailed description

Patients with ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA) without known atrial fibrillation (AF) are investigated with Prolonged Cardiac Monitoring (PCM) to detect AF. It is unclear if AF detected on 12-lead ECG after stroke occurrence bears the same risk of stroke as Device-detected AF. The investigators hypothesize, that Device-detected AF has a lower risk of ischemic stroke recurrence. The investigators will conduct a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from consecutive patients enrolled in the London Ontario Stroke Registry, (Ontario, Canada). The primary outcome will be a recurrent ischemic stroke at the end of the available follow-up window. The investigators will include ischemic stroke and TIA patients with ECG-detected AF and those with Device-detected AF on at least 7 days of Holter monitoring.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTProlonged cardiac monitoring

Prolonged cardiac monitoring

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTECG

Electrocardiogram

Sponsors

Luciano A. Sposato
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18 years * Patient with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke or TIA. * ECG-diagnosed AF or PCM-detected AF post ischemic stroke or TIA

Exclusion criteria

* Individuals younger than18 years-old * Patients without IS or TIA diagnosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants with Recurrent Ischemic Stroke at End of available Follow-up TimeDuration of follow-up - minimum of 3 months after the first encounter with the stroke teamDocumented recurrent ischemic stroke

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
DeathDuration of follow-up - minimum of 3 months after the first encounter with the stroke teamNumber of patients dead at the end of the available follow-up
Readmission for decompensated AF or heart failureDuration of follow-up - minimum of 3 months after the first encounter with the stroke teamPrevalence of readmission for decompensated AF or heart failure (HF) in each group
Prevalence of risk factors, cardiovascular comorbidities, and structural heart diseaseDocumented at baseline.Proportion with vascular risk factors, cardiovascular comorbidities, and structural heart disease in each group

Countries

Canada

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLuciano Sposato, MD, MBA (PI)

London Health Sciences Centre, Western University (London, ON. Canada)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 19, 2026