Skip to content

Comparing Air Embolic Load in Two Venous Cannulation Methods, 40 Patients Undergoing Elective Valve Surgery.

Does Venous Cannulation Method Affect Air Embolic Load to the Patient During Extracorporeal Circulation?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05820828
Enrollment
40
Registered
2023-04-20
Start date
2023-04-21
Completion date
2023-08-28
Last updated
2024-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Air Embolism, Extracorporeal Circulation; Complications

Brief summary

The goal of this single center prospective controlled observational and interventional trial is to investigate and compare origin of air emboli when different venous cannulation methods is used in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation. 40 consecutive elective patients will be included in two groups, depending on the procedure requiring bicaval or cavoatrial cannulation. After assorted into respective group, patients will be block randomized (five groups consisting of eight patients each) to either intervention group (low venous reservoir volume, 200-300 mL) or control group (venous reservoir volume \> 300 mL). Primary endpoint is to investigate if the amount of air emboli passing through the oxygenator to the arterial line differs between bicaval and cavoatrial venous cannulation during extracorporeal circulation. Secondary endpoints are the relative difference in amount air emboli between the groups, if there is any correlation between the amount of air in venous line and the amount of air passing through the oxygenator to the arterial line during extracorporeal circulation, and if difference is seen on the amount of air passing through the oxygenator depending on the level of volume in the venous reservoir.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTVolume control

Volume control in venous reservoir during extracorporeal circulation.

Sponsors

Petronella Torild
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients \> 18 years * Elective bicaval cannulation (mitral valve repair/replacement (MVR) or MVR + coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)) * Elective cavoatrial cannulation (aortic valve repair/replacement (AVR) or AVR + CABG * Planned normothermia (35-37˚C)

Exclusion criteria

* Acute heart surgery * Adult Congenital Heart Disease (ACHD) surgery * Endocarditis * Reoperation (primary procedure \> 2 years ago) * Perioperative iatrogenic adverse events (major bleeding, aortic dissection, other severe complications)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in count (number) of air emboli passing through the oxygenator to the arterial line between bicaval and cavoatrial venous cannulation.1 day (During extracorporeal circulation)Bubble counter measurements
Difference in volume (nano liter) of air emboli passing through the oxygenator to the arterial line between bicaval and cavoatrial venous cannulation.1 day (During extracorporeal circulation)Bubble counter measurements

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in the amount of air emboli in venous tubing between bicaval and cavoatrial cannulation.1 day (During extracorporeal circulation)Bubble counter measurements
Correlation between the amount of air in venous line and the amount of air passing through the oxygenator to the arterial line during extracorporeal circulation.1 day (During extracorporeal circulation)Bubble counter measurements
Difference in amount of air passing through the oxygenator depending on the volume in the venous reservoir (200-300 mL versus > 300 mL).1 day (During extracorporeal circulation)Bubble counter measurements

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026