Skip to content

Z-plasty and Heineke-Mikulicz Scrotoplasty in the Management of Penoscrotal Web

Evaluation of Z-plasty Versus Heineke-Mikulicz Scrotoplasty in the Management of Penoscrotal Web in Pediatric Age Group

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05817760
Enrollment
40
Registered
2023-04-18
Start date
2019-01-01
Completion date
2021-01-01
Last updated
2023-04-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urologic Diseases

Keywords

Penoscrotal web, Z-scrotoplasty, Heineke-Mikulicz

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the surgical outcome of Z-scrotoplasty versus Heineke-Mikulicz scrotoplasty in the management of congenital penoscrotal web in pediatric age group. The main question\[s\] it aims to answer are: • Question 1: Is there a difference in the surgical outcome between using Z-scrotoplasty and Heinke Miculickz scrotoplasty in the management of congenital penoscrotal web?\] Participants will be divided into two groups; Group A treated by Z-scrotoplasty and Group B treated by Heineke Miculickz scrotoplasty.

Detailed description

Background: The penoscrotal web may be congenital or acquired after excessive removal of ventral skin during circumcision. There are several previously described surgical techniques for the treatment of congenital webbed penis without a clear comparison between their outcomes. Purpose: the objective of our study was to compare the surgical results of Z-scrotoplasty and Heineke-Mikulicz scrotoplasty in the treatment of congenital webbed penis. Patients & Methods: Our prospective study included 40 uncircumcised patients presented with a webbed penis. They were divided into group A which was treated by Z-scrotoplasty and group B which was treated by Heineke-Mikulicz scrotoplasty.

Interventions

PROCEDUREZ-scrotoplasty

Z shape incision of the penoscrotal web and closure

PROCEDUREHeineke-Mikulicz scrotoplasty

Transverse incision of the penoscrotal web with vertical closure

Sponsors

Egyptian Biomedical Research Network
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with congenital penoscrotal web in the pediatric age group

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with any penile anomalies

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients who developed post-operative penile edema, hematoma, adequate skin coverage and wound contracture with recurrent webbing will be assessedOne post-operative yearPost-operative follow up for the detection of penile edema, hematoma, skin coverage and the development of any wound contracture and consequently recurrent webbing

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026