Skip to content

Investigation of Mohs Surgical Margins Using Two Photon Microscopy

Investigation of Mohs Surgical Margins Using Two Photon Microscopy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05814900
Enrollment
135
Registered
2023-04-18
Start date
2023-06-20
Completion date
2025-06-19
Last updated
2026-04-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Basal Cell Carcinoma

Brief summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the use of two photon fluorescence microscopy for detecting residual basal cell carcinoma during Mohs surgery. The main question it aims to answer is: • How similar are diagnosis of surgical margins to on two photon fluorescence microscopy compared to frozen section histology

Detailed description

This study is an study of skin cancer that will evaluate the feasibility of two photon fluorescence microscopy (TPFM) to evaluate surgical margins followed by standard of care frozen section analysis (FSA) for confirmation. To protect patients, following TPFM imaging, patients will receive standard of care evaluation using cryosectioned H&E slides, thus all patients will receive standard of care confirmation following experimental imaging. Individual excisions from consenting patients will be selected, fluorescently labeled and diagnosed using TPFM. Following imaging, specimens will be cryosectioned as per normal procedure. Following treatment, the results of the TPFM evaluation of each Mohs excisions will be compared to the results from FSA to assess the overall accuracy of TPFM and to determine if TPFM would result in changes to patient care if used without FSA confirmation.

Interventions

Excised tissues will be imaged with two photon microscopy

Sponsors

University of Rochester
Lead SponsorOTHER
Rochester Dermatologic Surgery
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Undergoing treatment for BCC with Mohs surgery at the performance site * Able to read and understand consent form

Exclusion criteria

* None

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Agreement Between Frozen Sections and Two Photon Fluorescence Microscopy on Mohs MarginsDuring Mohs surgery, typically less than 60 minutesSensitivity and specificity of two-photon fluorescence microscopy on Mohs surgical margins compared to frozen sections as gold standard

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Specificity of Frozen Sections and Two-photon Fluorescence Microscopy Accounting for Errors Caused Frozen Section ArtifactsDuring Mohs surgery, typically less than 60 minutesCalculation of specificity using frozen sections as the gold standard but accounting for frozen section artifacts that lead to incorrect treatment outcome. For example, initially positive on frozen section margins but negative on two-photon fluorescence microscopy because cryosectioning to produce a flat slide has sectioned 100s of microns deeper into the margin and into the tumor is counted as a false positive for frozen section.
Sensitivity of Frozen Sections and Two-photon Fluorescence Microscopy on True Margin DiagnosisDuring Mohs surgery, typically less than 60 minutesCalculation of sensitivity using frozen sections as the gold standard but accounting for frozen section artifacts that lead to incorrect treatment outcome. For example, initially negative on frozen section margins but positive on TPFM because a cryosectioning artifact has removed the area of pathology are counted as false negative on frozen sections.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMichael G Giacomelli, Ph.D

University of Rochester

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Withdrawal group was due to technical issues during frozen sectioning or specimen holder failure. The first 10 patients of the study (pre-study training) were used to develop procedures and train readers.

Baseline characteristics

Characteristic
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
107 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
28 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
117 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
131 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
135 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
66 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
69 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 135
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 135
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 135

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Apr 3, 2026