Skip to content

Validation of a Knee Brace for Gonarthrosis

Protocol for the Clinical Validation of a Valgus Knee Brace for Gonarthrosis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05814471
Enrollment
5
Registered
2023-04-14
Start date
2023-03-30
Completion date
2025-01-30
Last updated
2025-07-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gonarthrosis

Keywords

knee brace, orthosis, treatment efficacy, arthrosis, comfort, ease of use

Brief summary

A study about the effects of different fastening systems for knee braces on comfort, ease of installation and treatment efficacy both physical and psychological. Two different systems will be tested, velcro straps and a cable-fastening system.

Detailed description

There are 2 main types of knee braces for gonarthrosis: soft knee braces and rigid knee braces. Soft knee braces use malleable materials such as cloth or rubber to apply forces on the leg whereas rigid braces use plastic or metal shells. Three main types of fastening systems are used on these types of orthoses: velcro systems, hybrid systems and cable fastening systems. Therefore, different configurations exist to reduce biomechanical deficits caused by the pathology. Each fastening system has its advantages and disadvantages. Velcro straps are fast and intuitive to use, altough multiple difficulties are mentionned: adjusment, cleaning, the number of straps needed to maintain the knee brace in position as well as the noise while detaching the straps. Hybrid systems regularly use velcro straps to which are added quick-release fasteners to simplify the installation and uninstallation process. Cable fastening systems also use quick-release fasteners. The adjusment process is simple and precise with minimal noise with these systems. Comfort, efficacy and ease of use are essential qualities of a knee brace. Confort is primordial as it is directly linked to treatment adherence by the patients. Efficacy of a knee brace treatment may be measured by symptom or medication use evolution but also with daily practice of problematic movement by the patient. Ease of use must be optimized as it presents an opportunity to increase treatment adherence. The goal of the fastening system developped in partnership with Laboratoires Victhom is to increase ease of use of the knee brace while maintaining comfort and treatment efficacy.

Interventions

DEVICECable fastening system and 3d printed straps(14 days)

The participants will wear a Odra knee brace held in place with by a cable fastening system and 3d printed straps for 2 weeks.

DEVICEVelcro straps system(14 days)

The participants will wear a Odra knee brace held in place with by a velcro straps system for 2 weeks.

DEVICEAdjustment period(Velcro-14 days)

The participants will wear a new Odra knee brace held in place with by a velcro straps system for 2 weeks.

Sponsors

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council, Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
Laboratoire Victhom
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
TOPMED
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized trial with condition crossover

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Has worn an ODRA knee brace multiple hours a day during the last 6 months

Exclusion criteria

* Wounds on the lower body

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ease of Use Measurement ScaleBefore the 2 weeks of intervention with each brace, assessed after a brace fitting protocol and a few minutes of wearing the intervention brace.The scale was developped for this study. The mesure is an average of 5 items with 5 point scale rating system(1 harder to use; 5 easier to use). Mean score ranges from (1 harder to use; 5 easier to use)
Comfort Measurement ScaleBefore the 2 weeks of intervention with each brace, assessed after a brace fitting protocol and a few minutes of wearing the intervention brace.The scale was developped for this study. The mesure is an average of 2 items with 5 point scale rating system(1 lowest comfort; 5 highest comfort). Total score is adjusted to 0 (lowest comfort) to 100 (highest comfort).
Physical SymptomsChange between baseline(directly before adjustment period) and directly after 2 weeks adjustment period.Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Total Score (KOOS), translated to French(Quebec). Minimum=0(worst symptoms); Maximum=100(no symptoms);
Psychological SymptomsChange between baseline(directly before adjustment period) and directly after 2 weeks adjustment period.Psychological Symptoms Inventory Total Score(Ilfeld, F. W. (1976). Further validation of a psychiatric symptom index in a normal population. Psychological Reports, 39(3, Pt 2), 1215-1228.). Minimum=0; (No symptoms); Maximum=100(Worst Symptoms);

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Total enrollment was 5 participants, since participants did all interventions in a sequence, the total amount of participants for each intervention was 5 since there were no exclusions nor drop-outs.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
All participants who completed the intervention protocol.
5
Total5

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
1 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
4 Participants
Physical Symptoms68.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.9
Psychological Symptoms28.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 27.4
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
5 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 50 / 50 / 5
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 50 / 50 / 5
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 50 / 50 / 5

Outcome results

Primary

Comfort Measurement Scale

The scale was developped for this study. The mesure is an average of 2 items with 5 point scale rating system(1 lowest comfort; 5 highest comfort). Total score is adjusted to 0 (lowest comfort) to 100 (highest comfort).

Time frame: Before the 2 weeks of intervention with each brace, assessed after a brace fitting protocol and a few minutes of wearing the intervention brace.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cable Fastening SystemComfort Measurement Scale90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
Velcro StrapsComfort Measurement Scale80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.9
Adjustment Period(Velcro-14 Days)Comfort Measurement Scale62.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.9
Primary

Comfort Measurement Scale

The scale was developped for this study. The mesure is an average of 2 items with 5 point scale rating system(1 lowest comfort; 5 highest comfort). Total score is adjusted to 0 (lowest comfort) to 100 (highest comfort).

Time frame: Directly after the 2 weeks of intervention with each brace, assessed after a brace fitting protocol and a few minutes of wearing the intervention brace.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cable Fastening SystemComfort Measurement Scale90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2
Velcro StrapsComfort Measurement Scale75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.6
Adjustment Period(Velcro-14 Days)Comfort Measurement Scale77.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16
Primary

Ease of Use Measurement Scale

The scale was developped for this study. The mesure is an average of 5 items with 5 point scale rating system(1 harder to use; 5 easier to use). Mean score ranges from (1 harder to use; 5 easier to use)

Time frame: Before the 2 weeks of intervention with each brace, assessed after a brace fitting protocol and a few minutes of wearing the intervention brace.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cable Fastening SystemEase of Use Measurement Scale4.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.26
Velcro StrapsEase of Use Measurement Scale3.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
Adjustment Period(Velcro-14 Days)Ease of Use Measurement Scale4.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.78
Primary

Ease of Use Measurement Scale

The scale was developped for this study. The mesure is an average of 5 items with 5 point scale rating system(1 harder to use; 5 easier to use). Mean score ranges from (1 harder to use; 5 easier to use)

Time frame: Directly after the 2 weeks of intervention with each brace, assessed after a brace fitting protocol and a few minutes of wearing the intervention brace.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cable Fastening SystemEase of Use Measurement Scale4.60 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.33
Velcro StrapsEase of Use Measurement Scale3.45 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.17
Adjustment Period(Velcro-14 Days)Ease of Use Measurement Scale3.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.54
Primary

Physical Symptoms

Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Total Score (KOOS), translated to French(Quebec). Minimum=0(worst symptoms); Maximum=100(no symptoms);

Time frame: Change between baseline(directly before adjustment period) and directly after 2 weeks adjustment period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cable Fastening SystemPhysical Symptoms0.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.6
Primary

Physical Symptoms

Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Total Score (KOOS), translated to French(Quebec). Minimum=0(worst symptoms); Maximum=100(no symptoms);

Time frame: Change between directly after 2 weeks adjustment period and directly after 2 weeks of use for each arm

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cable Fastening SystemPhysical Symptoms2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Velcro StrapsPhysical Symptoms-0.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.4
Primary

Psychological Symptoms

Psychological Symptoms Inventory Total Score(Ilfeld, F. W. (1976). Further validation of a psychiatric symptom index in a normal population. Psychological Reports, 39(3, Pt 2), 1215-1228.). Minimum=0; (No symptoms); Maximum=100(Worst Symptoms);

Time frame: Change between baseline(directly before adjustment period) and directly after 2 weeks adjustment period.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cable Fastening SystemPsychological Symptoms-3.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.5
Primary

Psychological Symptoms

Psychological Symptoms Inventory Total Score(Ilfeld, F. W. (1976). Further validation of a psychiatric symptom index in a normal population. Psychological Reports, 39(3, Pt 2), 1215-1228.). Minimum=0; (No symptoms); Maximum=100(Worst Symptoms);

Time frame: Change between directly after 2 weeks adjustment period and directly after 2 weeks of use for each arm

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cable Fastening SystemPsychological Symptoms-7.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1
Velcro StrapsPsychological Symptoms-6.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.1

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026