Skip to content

Effectiveness of Basic Life Support Training for Rural Community Dwelling Elderly

Chang Gung University of Science and Technology

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05814120
Enrollment
218
Registered
2023-04-14
Start date
2021-05-01
Completion date
2022-08-31
Last updated
2023-04-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Community Dwelling

Keywords

Basic Life Support, Rural Community Dwelling, Elderly

Brief summary

The goal of this pre-post study is to test the effectiveness of basic life support (BLS) training for rural community-dwelling Elderly. The main question it aims to answer are can the training program tailored for rural elderly improve basic life support knowledge, attitude, and skills? Participants will receive an innovative BLS training program.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBLS training program

BLS training program was in accordance with the 2020 AHA cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) guidelines. The BLS training program adopts 4D teaching techniques, namely description (Describe), demonstration (Demo), implementation (Do), feedback (Debriefing).

Sponsors

Chang Gung University of Science and Technology
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

age older than 65-year-old, intact cognition, coordinated activities, and no history of severe cardiovascular disease, asthma, or lower extremity impairment.

Exclusion criteria

severe visual and hearing impairment, impractical to move, and mental illness.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes to the BLS Knowledge QuestionnaireCompletion by study, average 60 minutes.The BLS knowledge assessment consisted of 10 questions with structured yes or no answers and was based on expert consensus from the AHA (AHA, 2020). Scores were calculated based on the number of correct answers given, with higher scores indicating a greater understanding of BLS.
Changes to the BLS attitude QuestionnaireCompletion by study, average 60 minutes.The BLS attitude questionnaire contained five statements with five-point Likert-type scale responses ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Positive attitudinal answers awarded higher scores.
The observable BLS skill checklistCompletion by study, average 60 minutes.The observable BLS skill checklist included ten steps related to BLS practices, such as assessing responsiveness, calling for help, and using an AED. The researcher completed the checklist and rated each step on a 2-point scale, with higher scores indicating better BLS practices.

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026