Horizontal Ridge Deficiency
Conditions
Keywords
VIPCTF, GBR, Horizontal ridge augmentation
Brief summary
this study compares 2 techniques in guided bone regeneration for horizontal ridge augmentation in aesthetic zone
Detailed description
Guided bone regeneration is a technique for ridge augmentation using membranes The membrane of GBR is an essential component of treatment as it has some important characteristics manageability, space-making ability, and adequate mechanical, physical properties, and biocompatibility Collagen membranes are the most commonly used and can inhibit soft tissue growth in bone defects and achieve better wound healing and bone regeneration. on the other hand, a Vascularized inter-positional periosteal connective tissue flap is a flap that has been used as a substitute for the collagen membrane with promising results. Vascularized inter-positional periosteal connective tissue flap (VIPCTF) may have many advantages over traditional collagen membranes such as; high vascularity, decreased cost (as it may substitute membrane), providing an increase in soft tissue thickness, and reusability. So Evaluation of effect of vascularized interpositional periosteal connective tissue flap on horizontal ridge augmentation grafting of the anterior maxilla in comaprison with the collagen membranes
Interventions
PROCEDUREVascularized inter-positional periosteal connective tissue flap
It is a vascularized pedicled flap derived from the hard palate that can be used as a barrier to prevent in growth of soft tissue in guided bone regeneration and to increase soft tissue quantity
Sponsors
Cairo University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 35 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Patients with a horizontal defect in anterior and premolar areas of the maxilla (aesthetic zone).
Exclusion criteria
* poor oral hygiene * radiation therapy of head and neck cancer * intraoral soft and hard tissue lesions * Heavy smoking * Bone pathology
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Amount of bone width gain (horizontal augmentation) | 6 months | bone width gain is measured in millimeters by Cone beam computed tomography |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of bone formation in the bone biopsy | 6 months | Area percentage of newly formed bone is measured through histomorphometric analysis |
Countries
Egypt
Contacts
Primary ContactEsraa Ismail, Masters
Backup ContactRofaida Atef, PhD
Outcome results
None listed