Skip to content

NOVOSYN® Quick Versus MONOSYN® Quick Suture Material in Resective Periodontal Surgery

Randomized, Monocentric, Double Blinded, Prospective Study to Evaluate the Early Wound Healing After the Utilization of NOVOSYN® Quick Versus MONOSYN® Quick Suture Material in Resective Periodontal Surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05813236
Acronym
NOQMOQS
Enrollment
84
Registered
2023-04-14
Start date
2023-06-28
Completion date
2026-12-01
Last updated
2026-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Diseases, Gingivitis, Periodontal Diseases

Keywords

Resective periodontal surgery

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to prove that Novosyn Quick and Monosyn Quick are equivalent in early wound healing in adult patients undergoing resective periodontal surgery. In order to show equivalence between Novosyn Quick and Monosyn Quick EHS, which is composed of 3 parameters: clinical signs of reepithelization, clinical signs of haemostasis and clinical signs of inflammation, will be calculated for each suture 10 ± 5 days postoperatively and cannot differ more than 2 points. Furthermore, complications, the handling of the suture material, pain, satisfaction of the patient and bacterial contamination of the thread (optional) will also be assessed as secondary objectives.

Interventions

DEVICENovosyn® in resective periodontal surgery

The aim of resective procedures is the re-establishment of a healthy periodontium at a reduced level, accepting as irreversible the destruction that has already occurred. In essence, these procedures are all designed to achieve pocket elimination or reduction by the apical shift of the gingival margin.

DEVICEMonosyn® in resective periodontal surgery

The aim of resective procedures is the re-establishment of a healthy periodontium at a reduced level, accepting as irreversible the destruction that has already occurred. In essence, these procedures are all designed to achieve pocket elimination or reduction by the apical shift of the gingival margin.

Sponsors

Aesculap AG
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY
B.Braun Surgical SA
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Patients and the observers (assessors) will be blinded to the applied suture material. Patients will not be informed which suture material will be applied. The observers (assessors) who will perform the assessment of the wounds will also be unaware of the applied suture type.

Intervention model description

Patients undergoing resective periodontal surgery will randomly (1:1) receive Novosyn Quick (control group) or Monosyn Quick (treatment group). Randomization will take place intraoperatively through dynamic allocation with minimisation algorithm to a suture group. Randomization will be stratified by study site.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patient undergoing resective periodontal surgery abd one of the incisions below has been performed: * Crestal incision * Vertical incision * Intrasulcular incision * Submarginal incision * Written informed consent regarding the data collection for the RCT

Exclusion criteria

* Emergency surgery. * Pregnancy. * Breastfeeding * Patients taking medication that might affect wound healing. * Patients having a condition that might affect wound healing. * Patients with hypersensitivity or allergy to the suture material

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
early wound healing score (EHS)10 ± 5 days postoperativelyThe primary end point in order to evaluate the primary objective of the study will be the determination of early wound healing score (EHS) in patients undergoing resective periodontal surgery. The EHS will be evaluated in 3 parameters: clinical signs of re-epithelization (CSR), clinical signs of haemostasis (CSH), and clinical signs of inflammation (CSI). Zero, 3 or 6 points have been used to evaluate the CSR, whereas 0, 1, or 2 points have been used for both CSH and CSI (Table 3). The summation of these 3 parameters generated the EHS. The EHS for ideal wound healing was 10 points, while the worst possible score was 0 points. An EHS of 0 points was assigned in the presence of suppuration, independently of the ratings for the 3 single parameters.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of patients showing postoperative wound dehiscence10 ± 5 days postoperativelyIncidence of wound dehiscence after resective periodontal surgery. Dehiscence is the
Number of patients showing postoperative Dentinal hypersensitivity10 ± 5 days postoperativelyIncidence of Dentinal hypersensitivity after resective periodontal surgery
Number of patients showing postoperative Oral candidiasis10 ± 5 days postoperativelyIncidence of oral candidiasis after resective periodontal surgery
Number of patients showing postoperative Angular cheilitis10 ± 5 days postoperativelyIncidence of Angular cheilitis after resective periodontal surgery
Number of patients showing postoperative Swelling10 ± 5 days postoperativelyIncidence of Swelling after resective periodontal surgery
Number of patients showing postoperative Bleeding10 ± 5 days postoperativelyIncidence of Bleeding after resective periodontal surgery
Number of patients showing postoperative Infection10 ± 5 days postoperativelyIncidence of infection after resective periodontal surgery
Number of Systemic complications10 ± 5 days postoperativelyThe number of systemic complications is summarized, this includes fever, skin rash, neuropraxia, trismus, osteomyelitis, sinusitis and other complications.
Pain assessment10 ± 5 days postoperativelyThis parameter will be noted using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) which state "0" at one end representing "no pain" and "100" at the opposite end representing "maximal pain"
Satisfaction of the patient10 ± 5 days postoperativelyThis parameter will be noted using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) which state "0" at one end representing "not satisfied at all" and "100" at the opposite end representing "completely satisfied"
Number of patients with Bacterial contamination of the thread (optional)10 ± 5 days postoperativelyAssessment of bacterial colonization on the thread of the suture will be evaluated by sending the swab of the suture to laboratory to be investigated and analysed. Polymerase Chain Reaktion Test (PCR) analysis is the test used for bacterial colonization. The micro-IDent® and micro-IDent® plus tests are able to identify 11 bacterial pathogens, including two complex pathogens.
Assessment of the handling of the suture materialintraoperativelyAssessment of the suture material will be performed intra-operatively using a questionnaire including different dimensions (ease of passage through the tissue, first throw knot holding, knot security, knot tie down smoothness, surgical hand, memory effect and degree of fraying) with 5 point scale (excellent, very good, good, satisfied, poor) and the overall handling of the suture material.

Countries

Spain

Contacts

CONTACTJaume García López, Dr.
info@bbraun.com+3493586620
CONTACTJose Manuel Molina, Dr.
info@bbraun.com
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORCarolina Mor Reinoso, Dra.

Facultat d'Odontologia. Universitat Internacional de Catalunya

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 14, 2026