Skip to content

Accommodating Variable-Resistance Training in Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Efficacy of Accommodating Variable-Resistance Training on Muscle Architecture, Strength, and Functional Performance in Patients With Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05805969
Enrollment
58
Registered
2023-04-10
Start date
2021-11-28
Completion date
2023-01-19
Last updated
2023-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis

Brief summary

This study was designed to investigate the effect of six weeks of accommodating variable-resistance training on muscle architecture, muscle strength, and functional performance in patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Fifty-eight children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis were randomly allocated to the experimental group (n = 29, received the accommodating variable-resistance training) or the Control group (n = 29, received usual physical rehabilitation alone). Both groups were assessed for muscle architecture, muscle strength, and functional performance before and after treatment.

Detailed description

Fifty-eight patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis participated in the study. They were recruited from King Khalid Hospital and two other referral hospitals, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. They were between 12 and 18 years old, had poly-articular onset and bilateral knee involvement, were on stable doses of medications, and were not engaging in regular exercise regimens. Patients were excluded if they had fixed deformities, a history of joint surgery, or whose radiological investigations revealed erosive changes of bone, ankylosing, or fractures. Outcome measures 1. Muscle architecture: the fascicle length, pennation angle, and thickness of the vastus lateralis muscle were assessed using a standard high-resolution ultrasound imaging system. 2. Muscle strength: The peak concentric torque of the right and left knee extensors was measured through an isokinetic dynamometer. 3. Functional capacity: Three tests were used; the 6-minute walk test, the timed up and down stairs test, and the 4x10 meter Shuttle Run test. The experimental group received a 6-week accommodating variable-resistance training, two times a week for six consecutive weeks, in conformity with the National Strength and Conditioning Association guidelines and American Academy of Pediatrics safety standards. The training protocol included maximum voluntary concentric knee flexor/extensor actions through a motion range between 10 and 90 degrees. Three sets of five to 10 repetitions at angular speeds of 240, 180, and 120 degrees/second were performed. The training started with a warm-up for 10 minutes and ended with a cool-down for 5 minutes. The control group received the standard exercise program, 45 minutes per session, two times a week for six consecutive weeks. The program consisted of flexibility exercise, strength training, weight-bearing, proprioceptive training, and free treadmill walking or cycle ergometry.

Interventions

OTHERAccommodating variable-resistance training

The training was conducted twice weekly for six successive weeks under the close supervision of a licensed pediatric physical therapist in accordance with the safety performance guidelines defined by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the US National Strength and Conditioning Association. The training protocol included maximum voluntary concentric knee flexor/extensor actions. Three sets of five to 10 repetitions of maximum-effort concentric action at angular speeds of 240, 180, and 120 degrees/second. The training started with a 10-minute warm-up exercise and ended up with a 5-minute cool-down exercise.

OTHERStandard physical therapy

The program encompassed the standard exercises for patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (aerobic, weight-bearing, proprioceptive, flexibility, and strengthening exercises). The training was conducted for 45 minutes, two times a week for six successive weeks.

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

This was a single-blind protocol. The researcher who collected the data was blind to the allocation of treatment

Intervention model description

A prospective, dual-arm, randomized controlled trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed diagnosis of JIA * Polyarticular onset of JIA with bilateral involvement of the knee joint * Age between 12 and 18 years * Stable conditions (i.e., receive stable doses of medications in the past three months) * Not participating in a regular exercise program in the past six months

Exclusion criteria

* Fixed deformities * History of joint surgery * Ankylosing or fractures * Bone destruction (erosive changes of the knee joint) * Cardiopulmonary comorbidities * Recommendation against engaging in potentially explosive physical activities by the attending Rheumatologist.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fascicle length2 monthsThe linear distance (mm) between the insertion into the deep and superficial aponeurosis.
Pennation angle2 monthsThe angle (in degrees) between the fascicle and the deep aponeurosis.
Muscle thickness2 monthsThe perpendicular distance (mm) between the deep and superficial aponeurosis.
Muscle strength2 monthsIndicated by the peak concentric torque of the knee extensors (Nm). It was measured using an Isokinetic Dynamometer.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Timed up and down stairs test2 monthsThis test measured the time (seconds) that each patient took to climb up and down a 14-step stair flight (each 20 cm in height). Better performance is indicated by a shorter time.
4x10 meter Shuttle Run test2 monthsThis test measured the time (seconds) that each patient took to run forth and back a 10-meter track. Better performance is indicated by a shorter time.
Six-minute walk test2 monthsThis test identified the maximum distance (m) that each patient was able to cover over six minutes on a straight flat 30-m walkway, without running or jogging. Walking is regarded as more efficient in line with a longer distance coverage.

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026