Housing Problems, Opioid-Related Disorders
Conditions
Brief summary
SASH is a clinical trial feasibility study that will provide an intervention to improve Opioid Use Disorder (OUD), Quality of Life (QOL), and housing outcomes for homeless patients receiving Medication for Opiate Use Disorder (MOUD). The main questions of the study are does a $500 housing stipend for individuals on MOUD increase treatment retention, improved quality of life and prevent homelessness.
Detailed description
SASH is a clinical trial feasibility study that will provide an housing stipend for 8 individuals (N=8) experience homelessness and currently being treated for OUD to improve OUD treatment outcomes, QOL, and housing outcomes. To achieve these goals, patients will receive monthly $500 housing stipends that can be used for a broad range of temporary housing included in a list of resources compiled by the study. These stipends will be accompanied by Social Work assistance to find permanent housing which will last the full 12 months of the study. SASH will recruit OUD patients receiving MOUD who are struggling with homelessness, defined as living in an emergency shelter or a place not meant for habitation instead of a fixed, regular, and adequate nighttime residence. This definition is consistent with the one used by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. The patients will be recruited from the University of Maryland Addiction Treatment Program (ATP), a certified Substance Use Disorder (SUD) treatment program that provides MOUD and collocates medical care, wellness programs, and research. Patients will be eligible for SASH if they experienced homelessness during at least 15 of the 30 days preceding the dispensing of the first month's stipends.SASH will accomplish its goals using the following aims and objectives: AIM 1: Improve OUD outcomes * Hypothesis 1a: Patients will miss fewer methadone doses and receive more take-home methadone doses after receiving the stipends and Social Work assistance Endpoint: Percentages of missed and take-home methadone doses, as recorded by the software tracking methadone-dispensing at the ATP, in the 3-month period before the study, between Month 3 and 6 of the study, and between Month 9 and 12 of the study * Hypothesis 1b: Patients will experience an improvement in their OUD after receiving the stipends and Social Work assistance Endpoint: OUD Checklist scores completed at Day 0, Month 6, and Month 12 of the study * Hypothesis 1c: Patients will use fewer opioids and illicit substances after receiving the stipends and Social Work assistance Endpoint: Monthly urine toxicology tests (UTT) three months before study entry and monthly during the study AIM 2: Improve QOL * Hypothesis 2a: Patients will experience improvement in QOL during the study Endpoint: SF-36 scores at Day 0, Month 6, and Month 12 of the study * Hypothesis 2b: Patients will report benefit from receiving the stipends and Social Work assistance AIM 3: Prevent homelessness * Hypothesis 3a: The monthly $500 stipends will prevent patients from being homeless Endpoint: Percentage of days patients are homeless during the 6-month period stipends are distributed * Hypothesis 3b: Patients will be in housing by the end of the study Endpoint: Percentage of patients who are homeless or in either permanent or temporary housing by Month 12 of the study
Interventions
Same as arm description
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
8 individuals will be recruited and followed for 12 months following the intervention. The intervention includes providing a $500 monthly housing stipend for six months and twelve months of social work support to find permanent housing. Individuals will be asked to provide information thought interviews and clinical records.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Experienced homelessness during at least 15 of the 30 days preceding enrollment * Is a patient at the University of Maryland Addiction Treatment Program (ATP) receiving methadone treatment.
Exclusion criteria
\-
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Methadone Doses | 3 months prior to enrollment | Percentage of Missed Methadone Doses, Range 0 - 100%, Lower percentages mean better outcome. |
| OUD Checklist Scores | Baseline | Scores on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual V OUD checklist. Range 0 - 13. Higher scores mean worse outcome with 2-3 as mild severity, 4-5 moderate severity and 6 or more as severe. |
| Urine Toxicology Tests | Three months prior to enrollment | Detection of positive urine toxicology tests collected from chart reviews. Values are positive or negative for controlled substances. Positive test the worse outcome |
| Quality of Life Scores | Baseline | SF-36 scores 0 (worst) to 100 (best) |
| Housed vs Unhoused at 6 Months | 6 Months | Count of participants that are housed at 6 months |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Intervention Arm Individuals will receive $500 monthly stipend for the first months of the study and will receive twelve months of social work supports to help individuals find permanent housing.
Stipend and Social Work Supports: Same as arm description | 8 |
| Total | 8 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Intervention Arm |
|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 8 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 46.75 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.75 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 4 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 8 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 6 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 2 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 8 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 8 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 8 |
Outcome results
Housed vs Unhoused at 6 Months
Count of housed at 12 month
Time frame: 12 Months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Housed vs Unhoused at 6 Months | 3 Participants |
Housed vs Unhoused at 6 Months
Count of participants that are housed at 6 months
Time frame: 6 Months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Housed vs Unhoused at 6 Months | 4 Participants |
Methadone Doses
Percentage of Missed Methadone Doses, Range 0 - 100%, Lower percentages mean better outcome.
Time frame: 3-6 months post enrollment
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Methadone Doses | 7.47 Percent Missed | Standard Deviation 7.94 |
Methadone Doses
Percentage of Missed Methadone Doses, Range 0 - 100%, Lower percentages mean better outcome.
Time frame: 9-12 months post enrollment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Methadone Doses | 34.11 Percent Missed | Standard Deviation 32.11 |
Methadone Doses
Percentage of Missed Methadone Doses, Range 0 - 100%, Lower percentages mean better outcome.
Time frame: 3 months prior to enrollment
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Methadone Doses | 4.58 percent of missed doses | Standard Deviation 4.58 |
OUD Checklist Scores
Scores on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual V OUD checklist. Range 0 - 13. Higher scores mean worse outcome with 2-3 as mild severity, 4-5 moderate severity and 6 or more as severe.
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | OUD Checklist Scores | 8.25 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.4 |
OUD Checklist Scores
Scores on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual V OUD checklist. Range 0 - 13. Higher scores mean worse outcome with 2-3 as mild severity, 4-5 moderate severity and 6 or more as severe.
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | OUD Checklist Scores | 7.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 5.3 |
OUD Checklist Scores
Scores on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual V OUD checklist. Range 0 - 13. Higher scores mean worse outcome with 2-3 as mild severity, 4-5 moderate severity and 6 or more as severe.
Time frame: 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | OUD Checklist Scores | 7.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.4 |
Quality of Life Scores
SF-36 scores 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
Time frame: Baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Quality of Life Scores | 34.4 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.5 |
Quality of Life Scores
SF-36 scores 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
Time frame: 6 Month
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Quality of Life Scores | 31 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.8 |
Quality of Life Scores
SF-36 scores 0 (worst) to 100 (best)
Time frame: 12 Month
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Quality of Life Scores | 32 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.4 |
Urine Toxicology Tests
Detection of positive urine toxicology tests collected from chart reviews. Values are positive or negative for controlled substances. Positive test the worse outcome
Time frame: Month 11
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Urine Toxicology Tests | 3 Participants |
Urine Toxicology Tests
Detection of positive urine toxicology tests collected from chart reviews. Values are positive or negative for controlled substances. Positive test the worse outcome
Time frame: Month 12
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Urine Toxicology Tests | 3 Participants |
Urine Toxicology Tests
Detection of positive urine toxicology tests collected from chart reviews. Values are positive or negative for controlled substances. Positive test the worse outcome
Time frame: Month 2
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Urine Toxicology Tests | 4 Participants |
Urine Toxicology Tests
Detection of positive urine toxicology tests collected from chart reviews. Values are positive or negative for controlled substances. Positive test the worse outcome
Time frame: Month 6
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Urine Toxicology Tests | 6 Participants |
Urine Toxicology Tests
Detection of positive urine toxicology tests collected from chart reviews. Values are positive or negative for controlled substances. Positive test the worse outcome
Time frame: Month 7
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Urine Toxicology Tests | 5 Participants |
Urine Toxicology Tests
Detection of positive urine toxicology tests collected from chart reviews. Values are positive or negative for controlled substances. Positive test the worse outcome
Time frame: Month 8
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Urine Toxicology Tests | 5 Participants |
Urine Toxicology Tests
Detection of positive urine toxicology tests collected from chart reviews. Values are positive or negative for controlled substances. Positive test the worse outcome
Time frame: Three months prior to enrollment
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Urine Toxicology Tests | 7 Participants |
Urine Toxicology Tests
Detection of positive urine toxicology tests collected from chart reviews. Values are positive or negative for controlled substances. Positive test the worse outcome
Time frame: Month 1
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Urine Toxicology Tests | 5 Participants |
Urine Toxicology Tests
Detection of positive urine toxicology tests collected from chart reviews. Values are positive or negative for controlled substances. Positive test the worse outcome
Time frame: Month 5
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Urine Toxicology Tests | 6 Participants |
Urine Toxicology Tests
Detection of positive urine toxicology tests collected from chart reviews. Values are positive or negative for controlled substances. Positive test the worse outcome
Time frame: Month 3
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Urine Toxicology Tests | 5 Participants |
Urine Toxicology Tests
Detection of positive urine toxicology tests collected from chart reviews. Values are positive or negative for controlled substances. Positive test the worse outcome
Time frame: Month 4
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Urine Toxicology Tests | 5 Participants |
Urine Toxicology Tests
Detection of positive urine toxicology tests collected from chart reviews. Values are positive or negative for controlled substances. Positive test the worse outcome
Time frame: Month 9
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Urine Toxicology Tests | 6 Participants |
Urine Toxicology Tests
Detection of positive urine toxicology tests collected from chart reviews. Values are positive or negative for controlled substances. Positive test the worse outcome
Time frame: Month 10
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention Arm | Urine Toxicology Tests | 5 Participants |