Skip to content

Effect of Cognitive Stimulating Interventions on Cognitive Self-Efficacy and Sense of Happiness Among Older Adults

Cognitive Stimulating Interventions Improve Cognitive Self- Efficacy and Sense of Happiness Among Older Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05802043
Enrollment
80
Registered
2023-04-06
Start date
2023-01-17
Completion date
2023-02-10
Last updated
2023-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Self- Efficacy

Keywords

Sense of Happiness, Cognitive Stimulating Interventions

Brief summary

The present study aims to determine the effect of cognitive stimulation interventions on cognitive self-efficacy and sense of happiness among older adults. Research hypothesis: Older adults who receive the cognitive stimulation interventions exhibit higher cognitive self-efficacy and sense of happiness than those who do not receive it.

Detailed description

A convenient sample of eighty (80) older adults will be used according Epi info V 7.0 program calculation based on the following statistical parameters ; Population size: 250, expected frequency: 50%, confidence coefficient: 95%, acceptable error: 10%, minimum sample size = 70. The study will include eighty (80) older adults aged 60 years and more and fulfilling the following criteria: Inclusion criteria 1. Aged 60 years and old. 2. Able to read and write. 3. Have mild cognitive impairment: score of score of 18-23 based on the Mini Mental State Examination Scale (MMSE). 4. Have no depression: score of 0 to 4 using the Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (GDS\_SF). 5. Accept participation in the study. 6. Available at the selected setting during the time of data collection. 7. Have no pronounced impairment of their visual and auditory abilities could affect their participation in the group and make use of most of the materials in the sessions, as determined by the researchers. The selected study subjects (80) will be randomly assigned to two equal groups of 40 older adults each as flows; Group 1, study group: include older adults who will receive the proposed interventions, cognitive stimulation interventions. Group 2, control group: include older adults who will receive the routine activities of the elderly club.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCognitive Stimulating Interventions

a quasi-experimental research design.The study subjects of group 1, the study group, will receive the proposed interventions, the cognitive stimulation interventions through small groups of study subjects receiving 12 sessions of group activities (2 sessions/week, approximately 45- 60 minutes/session). A group size of 6 to 8 will be conducted. The interventions group will be conducted in activity rooms within the elderly club.

Sponsors

Alexandria University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Aged 60 years and old. 2. Able to read and write. 3. Have mild cognitive impairment: score of score of 18-23 based on the Mini Mental State Examination Scale (MMSE). 4\. Have no depression: score of 0 to 4 using the Geriatric Depression Scale Short Form (GDS\_SF). 5\. Accept participation in the study. 6. Available at the selected setting during the time of data collection.

Exclusion criteria

* 7\. Have pronounced impairment of their visual and auditory abilities could affect their participation in the group and make use of most of the materials in the sessions, as determined by the researchers.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
I) Mini-Mental State Examination (MMS) Scale2 weeksThe MMS scale was developed by Folestein et al., (1975). It used to assess cognitive function of the older adults. It contained questions concerning registration, orientation, calculation, recall, attention, and language. The MMS scale score was 30 point and classified as follows: -30. -23. -17. The MMS was translated into Arabic and approved to be valid and reliable (r=0.96) by El Husseini (2008). The Arabic version of this scale was used in the present study.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
II) Geriatric Depression Scale- Short Form (GDS-SF)2 weeksThe Geriatric Depression Scale - short Form (GDS-SF), a self-report tool with 15-item developed by Yesavage et al. (1983) to assess general well-being and depression in the elderly. The older adults should select one answer either yes (1) or no (0) for their feelings over the past week. The scores ranged from 0 to 15. Items' score will be calculated for the total score. A score of 0 to 4 meant no depression, score of 5 to 8 meant mild depression, score of 9 to 11 meant moderate depression, and 12-15 meant severe depression. The GDS-SF was translated into Arabic and approved to be reliable (r=0.70) and valid by ElHusseini (2013). The Arabic version of this scale was used in the current study.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
III) Six -Domains Perceived Cognitive Self-Efficacy for Older Adults Structured Interview Questionnaire2 weeksThis tool will be developed by the researchers to assess the cognitive self-efficacy among older adults. It composed of 40 items related to six domains covering six cognitive functions (Everyday Memory, Language, Visuospatial Abilities, Planning, Organization, and Divided attention). Each domain contains several cognitive task related to this domain. Older adults asked to rate how certain they are that they can do each cognitive task. They rate the degree of confidence in their cognitive abitity by recording a number from 0 to 10, next to each statement, where 0 means cannot do at all, 5 moderately certain can do, and 10 indicates highly certain can do.the total score ranges from 0 to 400. The higher the score is the higher cognitive self-efficacy.
IV) The Subjective Happiness Scale (SHS):2 weeksThe Subjective Happiness Scale is a 4-item scale that developed by Lyubomirsky, et al., (1999) to measure subjective happiness. Each item is completed by choosing one of 7 options that finish a given sentence fragment. The options are different for each of the four questions. Two items ask respondents to characterize themselves using both absolute ratings and ratings relative to peers, whereas the other two items offer brief descriptions of happy and unhappy individuals and ask respondents the extent to which each characterization describes them. The average of the item scores is an overall measure sense of happiness with high scores indicating greater sense of happiness.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026