Skip to content

PEP and OPEP Devices in Cystic Fibrosis

Evaluation of the Short-term Use of Selected PEP and OPEP Devices in Cystic Fibrosis Patients During an Exacerbation of the Disease

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05801952
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-04-06
Start date
2020-01-01
Completion date
2025-02-28
Last updated
2023-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cystic Fibrosis

Keywords

Cystic Fibrosis, PEP, OPEP

Brief summary

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is the most common severe autosomal recessive genetic disease in Caucasians. The CFTR (cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator) gene, which encodes the chloride channel of the epithelial cell membrane, is responsible for the development of the disease. Respiratory physiotherapy, especially bronchial drainage is one of the basic elements of comprehensive management in patients with CF. Among the many procedures used in CF drainage physiotherapy, the most commonly include these using positive expiratory pressure (PEP) and oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP). The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of the usage of selected PEP and OPEP devices in bronchial drainage in cystic fibrosis patients during exacerbation of the disease.

Detailed description

The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of the short-term (4-days) use of selected devices generating positive expiratory pressure (PEP device: PARI PEP® S System) and oscillating positive expiratory pressure (OPEP devices: Aerobika\* OPEP Device and PARI O-PEP Device commonly called: Flutter) in bronchial drainage in cystic fibrosis patients during exacerbation of the disease. Patients will perform bronchial drainage in three different groups using different devices in each of them. The main questions study aims to answer are: 1. Whether the devices used are effective in bronchial drainage in patients with cystic fibrosis, 2. Are there differences in efficiency between the devices used.

Interventions

DEVICEAerobika* OPEP, PARI O-PEP (Flutter), PARI PEP® S System

The 4-day physiotherapy program consists of performing bronchial drainage using one of the three devices: Aerobika\* OPEP Device (Trudell Medical International), Flutter - PARI O-PEP Device (PARI Respiratory Equipment, Inc.) and PEP - PARI PEP® S System (PARI Respiratory Equipment, Inc.).

Sponsors

National Institute for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases, Poland
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The 4-day physiotherapy program consists of performing bronchial drainage using one of the three devices (Aerobika\* OPEP, PARI O-PEP, PARI PEP® S System). Frequency: twice a day. Physiotherapy session consist of breathing through the device for 15 breaths in one cycle, and taking a few (3-5) relaxed exhalations in accordance with the forced exhalation technique (FET). This cycle is repeated at least three times. The maximum number of cycles is five considering the need. Duration: 10 - 20 min.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* written consent of the patient and/or guardian, age over 12, no disease complications (within the last 2 months) in the form of: active haemoptysis, pneumothorax, chest surgeries, surgical procedures in the area of the esophagus (esophageal varices), otitis media, * the ability to perform correctly lung function tests and FEV1 value above 20% predicted, * the presence of respiratory symptoms indicating exacerbation of the disease, i.e. increasing of cough, increasing of dyspnoea, decrease in FEV1 by 10% or more from a previously recorded value.

Exclusion criteria

* lack of written consent of the patient and/or guardian, age below 12, occurrence of disease complications (within the last 2 months) in the form of: active hemoptysis, pneumothorax, chest surgeries, surgical procedures in the area of the esophagus (esophageal varices), otitis media, * inability to perform lung function tests, FEV1 value below 20% of predicted value, * PEP, OPEP device intolerance, * no symptoms of the respiratory system indicating exacerbation of the disease, i.e. increasing of cough, increasing of dyspnoea, decrease in in FEV1 less than 10% from a previously recorded value.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pulmonary Function. Measured indicators: FEV1, FVCBaseline and the day 4Volume measurement (L). Change from baseline to day 4
Pulmonary Function. Measured indicators: FEF75Baseline and the day 4Volume and flow measurement (L/s). Change from baseline to day 4
Sputum expectoratedfrom the 1st to the 4th dayVolume measurement (ml)

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactJarosław Prusak
jprusak@igrabka.edu.pl+48182676060
Backup ContactKatarzyna Warzeszak
kwarzeszak@igrabka.edu.pl+48182676060

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026