Skip to content

Promoting BEST (BEtter, Faster, Longer, STronger) Walking for People With Parkinson's

Promoting BEST (BEtter, Faster, Longer, STronger) Walking for People With Parkinson's

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05801926
Enrollment
100
Registered
2023-04-06
Start date
2023-01-31
Completion date
2024-01-31
Last updated
2023-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Parkinson Disease

Keywords

gait, walking, wearable, feedback, motivation

Brief summary

This project aims to improve how people with Parkinson's Disease (PD) walk. The global aim is to identify obstacles and solutions for people with PD for adopting technology to track and improve their gait to make them better and safer walkers. To meet this aim members of Parkinson Quebec will be surveyed about their technology readiness, physical, cognitive, and psychological health, and rehabilitation access. The survey should not take more than 20 minutes to complete on the web. Subsequently, a random sample of 100 survey participants will be offered a wearable device, the Heel2ToeTM sensor, designed to improve gait quality. This device emits a beep when a proper step is taken. This external cue reinforces the adoption of an adequate gait. In addition to the device, participants will be offered 5 sessions of telemonitoring to help them use the device optimally. Monitoring of use and outcomes will be over 3 months and the sensor is theirs to keep.

Detailed description

The global aim of this research program is to identify technical, attitudinal, and motivational obstacles and solutions for people with PD for adopting technology to improve gait and to quantify changes in gait biomechanics that will make participants better and safer walkers, ultimately improving physical function, physical activity, motivation, and quality of life. Specific objective: Among members of the PQ who meet the criteria for technology readiness and have sufficient walking capacity to use the Heel2ToeTM sensor at home, the objectives are to estimate the extent to which they: (1) require support from the technology and rehabilitation team to optimize use; (2) use the sensor; (3) and change gait pattern, walking behaviours, motivation and functional and quality of life indicators over a period of 3 months. Design: An individualized, blocked, stepped-wedge design will be used, a design favoured for implementation science questions 63,64 and applicable here as the team does not have the resources to implement the technology to all participants all at once. Parkinson Quebec has provided funds to provide sensors for 100 people. Variable size clusters of people will be formed and randomized to receive the Heel2Toe sensor, training, and remote supervised use, at intervals of 3 weeks. The cluster size will be randomly determined ranging from 4 to 10. As everyone selected for the implementation have already filled out the survey, there is a common data set at project entry. This assessment will be repeated prior to being entered into the Heel2Toe phase and then 3 months later.

Interventions

DEVICEHeel2Toe[TM] sensor

Heel2Toe is a new generation of wearables that provides real-time auditory feedback when the person takes a good step, one in which the step is initiated with a strong heel strike.

Sponsors

MedTeq
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Healthy Brains for Healthy Lives
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Mitacs
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
PhysioBiometrics Inc.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Nancy Mayo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Everyone eventually gets the intervention, it is the order that is randomized. The outcome is gait quality measured directly from the sensor and is not affected by observers.

Intervention model description

Individual, blocked, stepped-wedge

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Technology readiness will be determined by the following criteria: * has wifi * has a smartphone that is recent enough to support the technology or willing to acquire one * uses apps on the smartphone on most days of the week with or without the aid of another person * positively endorses the question Are you interested in learning new things?58 and I walk outdoors on most days, weather permitting. To screen participants for their capacity to use the Heel2Toe sensor, participants meeting the technology readiness criteria will be instructed to send a smartphone video of themselves doing a modified Timed-up-an-Go test65 in which the person, stands up from a chair, walks minimum of 10 meters (original TUG is 3 m.), turns, walks back to the chair, and sits down (long-TUG).

Exclusion criteria

* unable to do the long TUG without assistance or need for a walking aid * unable to recover balance independently from a perturbation during execution of the long TUG * unable to reinitiate movement without assistance or without losing balance during a freezing event occurring during the long TUG. -

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Angular velocity of ankle at heel strike averaged over a walk of a least 50 stepsChange from baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 1 yeardegrees per second
Angular velocity of ankle during push-off averaged over a walk of a least 50 stepsChange from baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 1 yeardegrees per second
Angular velocity of ankle during foot swing averaged over a walk of a least 50 stepsChange from baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 1 yeardegrees per second
Co-efficient of variation of angular velocity of ankle during three phases of gait cycle, heel-strike, push-off, swing averaged over a walk of at least 50 stepsChange from baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 1 yearratio of standard deviation to mean converted to percent.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health-related quality of life (HRQL)better)Change from baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 1 yearPreference-based Parkinson Index (0-100; higher is better)
MotivationChange from baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 1 yearStarkstein Apathy Scale (0-42, higher worse)
Cognitive Performance TestChange from baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 1 yearSymbol Digit Modality Test (errors in 90 seconds)
Self-reported Cognitive AbilityChange from baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 1 yearCommunicating Cognitive Concerns (C3Q: 0-36, higher is better)
ApathyChange from baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 1 yearMotivation Inventory (0-68, higher worse)
Walking behaviourChange from baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 1 yearDaily step count
Health-related quality of life (HRQL)Change from baseline to 3 months, 6 months, 1 yearEQ-5D-5L (0-1; higher is better)

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026