Skip to content

Dynamic Stability Exercises in Patients With Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder

Dynamic Stability Exercises in Patients With Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome and Hypermobility Spectrum Disorder - a Mixed-methods Feasibility Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05800262
Enrollment
15
Registered
2023-04-05
Start date
2019-04-19
Completion date
2019-12-12
Last updated
2023-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Hypermobility Syndrome

Keywords

Hypermobility, exercise intervention, feasibility study, EDS

Brief summary

Background: Symptomatic hypermobility may lead to a number of restrictions in daily life. So far, there is a lack of effective treatments. A whole-body dynamic stability exercise intervention targets to stimulate the dynamic stability and activation of the proprioceptive system and thereby intends to improve patients' health. The aim of the current study was to examine the feasibility, acceptability and impact of a whole-body dynamic stability exercise intervention in patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorder. The aim of the current study was to examine the feasibility, acceptability and impact of a dynamic stability exercise intervention in patients with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and hypermobility spectrum disorder. Methods: This is a mixed-methods feasibility study. Fifteen patients (14 women and 1 man) with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome or hypermobility spectrum disorder and chronic pain were recruited from two pain specialist clinics in the South-East of Sweden. A dynamic stability exercise program for daily home-exercise was applied during five physiotherapist led sessions distributed over seven weeks. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) included pain and function, psychological well-being and quality of life. The clinical tests included walking and balance. Through qualitative interviews patients and physiotherapists described their experiences of the assessments and intervention. Assessments were done at baseline, after the intervention, and at the 3-month follow-up.

Detailed description

The specific research questions are: 1. Do retention rates, adherence rates and adverse events allow continuation to a large scale RCT? 2. What are the tendencies of impact of the exercise program on pain, function, psychological well-being and quality of life? 3. Which of the outcome measures used are appropriate and acceptable? 4. What are the patients' and physiotherapists' experiences of the exercise program and protocol.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALDynamic stability exercises

A dynamic stability exercise program for daily home-exercise was applied during five physiotherapist led sessions distributed over seven weeks.

Sponsors

Linkoeping University
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Länssjukhuset i Kalmar län
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University Hospital, Linkoeping
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 67 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria were adults aged 18 to 67 years old, with generalized hypermobility (castori. A framework), persistent pain (i.e. longer than three months) in at least two of four quadrants of the body and ability to perform the exercises.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Identification of suitable measures for a forthcoming RCTNine monthsQualitative and quantitative evaluation through secondaty outcome measures and qualitative interviews with patients and physiotherapists

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional Rating Index6 monthsDisability regarding daily activities
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory 206 monthsFive subscales measuring general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced motivation, reduced activity and mental fatigue. Item 19 was removed according to Hagelin (2009).
Arthritis Self-efficacy scale6 monthsTwenty items divided into three sub-scales for self-efficacy for physical function, other symptoms and pain.
Stress and Crisis Inventory-936 monthsThirty-five items on physical and psychological symptoms that can be clinical manifestations of stress.
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia6 monthsQuestionnaire measuring kinesiophobia, 17 items.
Orthostatic Hypotension Questionnaire6 monthsAssessment of symptoms and daily activity in relation to orthostatic hypotension. 10 items.
Pain numeric rating scale6 monthsRating of mean pain last week
Berg balance scale6 months14 tasks common in daily activities testing balance
Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 26 monthsNine tasks testing balance
Timed up and go6 monthsMobility, balance, walking ability and fall risk in older adults
2-minute walk test6 monthsWalking ability
Wii balance test using a Wii Balance Board6 monthsBalance test. Centre of pressure path length, anterio-posterior and medio-lateral sway measured standing on two feet with eyes open and eyes closed, standing on dominant foot and on non-dominant foot with eyes open. Tests performed according to Schmidt (2017), but during 60 seconds instead of 30 seconds.
European Quality of Life questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L)6 monthsHealth related quality of life

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026