Skip to content

Complementary Self-help Strategies for Patients With Post-COVID-19 Syndrome

Complementary Self-help Strategies for Patients With Post-COVID-19 Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05798221
Acronym
NASH-POCO
Enrollment
86
Registered
2023-04-04
Start date
2023-04-25
Completion date
2025-10-06
Last updated
2025-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post-COVID-19 Syndrome

Keywords

complementary medicine, COVID-19, post-COVID-19 Syndrome, randomized controlled trial, self-help

Brief summary

Individuals affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection may subsequently be affected by the so-called post-COVID syndrome. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of a multimodal 10-week group program consisting of self-help strategies based on complementary medicine approaches of TEM (Traditional European Medicine), TCM (Traditional Chinese Medicine), and TIM (Traditional Indian Medicine) in addition to treatment as usual versus treatment as usual alone (no active study intervention/waiting list). Endpoints of the study include subjective quantitative and qualitative as well as objective (physician-reported) variables.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALComplementary self-help strategies in addition to treatment as usual

The 10-week group program consists of self-help strategies from complementary medicine approaches of TEM (Traditional European Medicine), TCM (Traditional Chinese Medicine), and TIM (Traditional Indian Medicine) in addition to treatment as usual

OTHERTreatment as usual

The active control group consists a 16-week waiting period, where treatment as usual is allowed. In case of acute worsening/progression of the symptoms, consultations with the study physician are offered anytime. After the waiting period, the control group will be offered the same units as in the experimental group.

Sponsors

Universität Duisburg-Essen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age of 18 years and older * Confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis by: 1. polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test or 2. physician's letter/medical certificate/quarantine order due to ICD-10-GM U07.1 G or ICD-10-GM U09.9 G * Sequelae symptoms, new symptoms/disabilities, or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition that occurred in the first 3 months after confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and persisted for more than 2 months * At least 8 points (moderate symptom burden) out of a possible 32 points on the Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8)

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who were treated with invasive ventilation during active SARS-CoV-2 infection * Severe comorbid mental illness (e.g. addiction diagnosis, major depression) or other severe comorbid somatic illness (e.g. cancer without remission, severe pre-existing cardiovascular disease, insufficiency of other organs such as kidney or liver, acute febrile infection, other severe neurologic disease) * Pregnancy or lactation * Current pension application * Simultaneous participation in other clinical/interventional trials

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-COVID-19 symptom burdenWeek 16Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8): self-report scale from 0 to 32 points with higher scores indicating higher level of burden

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
FatigueWeek 10Chalder fatigue-scale (CFS): self-report scale from 0 - 33 points with higher scores indicating higher level of physical and mental fatigue
InsomniaWeek 16Insomnia Severity Index (ISI): self-report scale from 0 - 28 points with higher score indicating higher level of insomnia
Cardiovascular performanceWeek 106-Minute-Walking-Test (6MWT): a longer traveled distance indicates a higher level of cardiovascular/pulmonary capacity
Pulmonary performanceWeek 10Borg Breathlessness Scale (Borg-CR10-Scale): scale from 0-10 with higher scores indicating higher breathlessness/dyspnea - assesed subsequent to the 6-Minute-Walking-Test
Post-COVID-19 functional status (physician-reported)Week 10Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale - Physician Version (PCFS): physician-report scale from 0 - 4 points with 0 = no functional limitations and 4 = severe functional limitations
Adverse eventsWeeks 0 - 10All adverse events in relation and unrelated to the intervention
Post-COVID-19 symptom burdenWeek 10Somatic Symptom Scale-8 (SSS-8): self-report scale from 0 to 32 points with higher scores indicating higher level of burden
Post-COVID-19 functional status (self-reported)Week 10Post-COVID-19 Functional Status Scale - Patient Version (PCFS): self-report scale from 0 - 4 points with 0 = no functional limitations and 4 = severe functional limitations
Health-related quality of lifeWeek 10Short-form Health Survey (SF-12): self-report scale from 0 - 100 with higher score indicates a better health state
Anxiety and depressionWeek 10Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): self-report scale form 0 - 42 with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety and depression

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment ExpectationWeek 0Treatment Credibility Scale (TCS): expectation about the treatment effectiveness measured from 0 = no effectiveness to 10 = highest possible effectiveness
Self-efficacyWeek 10Arthritis Self-Efficacy Scale (ASES): the scale ranges from 1 to 10 with higher scores indicating more perceived efficacy
StressWeek 10Perceived Stress Scale (PSS): 10-item scale, summed to create a psychological stress score of maximal 40 points with higher scores indicating greater psychological stress
LonelinessWeek 10UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS): the short form of the UCLA-LS constsis of 12 items, ranges from 0 to 36 points, with higher higher scores indicating greater loneliness
FlourishingWeek 10Flourishing-Scale (FS): the scale ranges from 8 (lowest possible value) to 56 (highest possible value) with higher values correspond to a person with many psychological resources and strengths

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026