HIV
Conditions
Brief summary
Although global rates of HIV infection have decreased overall, rates among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Southeast Asia are increasing. A recent review of available global data and the molecular epidemiology of HIV among MSM in Southeast Asia suggests that targeted interventions for MSM populations are necessary to reduce HIV incidence in the region. For example, in Vietnam's urban centers, the HIV epidemic among MSM is growing rapidly, with an estimated prevalence of 17% in Ho Chi Minh City and an estimated incidence of 5.8% among young men who have sex with men in Hanoi. Behavioral epidemiology has also been well-described, with high rates of unprotected sex, multiple concurrent partners, untreated STIs, and poor engagement in the HIV care continuum, including low rates of HIV testing, all contributing to high levels of circulating virus among MSM risk networks.
Detailed description
HIV rates among MSM in Vietnam have increased sharply since 2006. By 2011, rates had reached 19%, with HCMC accounting for the largest number of infections. MSM, particularly YMSM, continue to have low rates of HIV testing and poor engagement in HIV care. Studies have identified various risk factors, including low knowledge and perceived risk, sexual risk and STIs/HIV, complexity in identity and meaning, substance use and mental health, limited HIV interventions, and poor engagement in health services. Increasing HIV testing among MSM, particularly YMSM, is crucial for early detection and enrolment in ART. However, individual and institutional-level barriers hinder testing, such as poor knowledge, stigma, and poor repeat testing. Using the internet as an intervention platform can reach and engage MSM who cannot be reached using conventional health-engagement approaches. The proposed study aims to adapt and pilot test an online HIV testing intervention (OHT) targeted at young men who have sex with men (MSM) in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The OHT intervention was developed and successfully implemented among MSM in Thailand, showing significant impacts on testing rates and linkage to HIV care. The proposed study builds on longstanding collaborations between HIV researchers from Mahidol University in Thailand and a local community-based organization that serves YMSM in Vietnam. The findings from the proposed study will have important implications for assessing the potential for OHT intervention to overcome profound and longstanding barriers to HIV testing among YMSM in Vietnam, an outcome that if brought to scale could significantly improve enrolment in ART and reduce HIV incidence. Innovative strategies to increase testing and improve continuum will be needed to reduce HIV transmission in Vietnam, where little data is available on uptake of HIV testing among Vietnamese MSM, and a high proportion of men who have sex with men surveyed have never been voluntarily tested for HIV. HIV self-testing with online supervision represents an important strategy to improve scale-up of HIV testing among Vietnamese MSM. The proposed OHT can overcome the barrier of face-to-face testing and counseling, while ensuring that Vietnamese YMSM receive real-time guidance and support for self-testing and linkage to care and treatment, if positive. The project's aims are: (1) to conduct a qualitative study with Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) to identify potential barriers and facilitators to the uptake of OHT among YMSM in HCMC; (2) to conduct a quantitative study with online survey questionnaires to adapt the existing Thai OHT intervention for use among YMSM in Vietnam, including translation and socio-cultural refinement of testing kits, clip video content, online pre-and post-test counseling, and broader socio-cultural contexts. Data from Aim 1 will be analyzed and used to design the test kit, the clip video content, and when and how the HIV counselor will conduct pre-and post-test counseling. Moreover, willingness to engage in OHT as well as factors related to sustained testing will be collected through an online survey, and (3) to conduct a pilot study with Randomized Control Trial to demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of the adapted OHT intervention, including the use of an HIV rapid diagnostic antibody/antigen-based self-testing with an HIV counselor through video conferencing. YMSM recruited through the online survey who indicated an interest in OHT will be randomly selected to the OHT group or the venue-based testing group (standard of care), using repeated measures at 6 and 12 months to compare HIV testing rates and behavioral outcomes because of retention and we need to understand how the socio-cultural factors affecting to OHT retention.
Interventions
A pilot study to assess the feasibility of HIV self-testing with online supervision
venue-based HIV testing
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
1:1 randomization to either HIV testing with online supervision or venue testing as usual
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age 16-29 years at cohort baseline * Self-reported male gender * Self-reported having had anal sex with another man in the past 12 months * Speak, read and write Vietnamese * Vietnamese citizenship * Resident of the assessment city (Ho Chi Minh City) for at least 6 months
Exclusion criteria
* Do not consent to HIV self-testing with online supervision * Not willing to give contact information for follow-up assessments
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision Past 6 Months at Baseline | Assessed at baseline | Number of participants who have gone through the intervention (self-tested for HIV with online supervision past 6 months). For the control group, participants will answer a yes/no question if they have tested for HIV in the past 6 months. |
| HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision Past 6 Months at 6 Months | Assessed at 6 months | Number of participants who have gone through the intervention (self-tested for HIV with online supervision past 6 months). For the control group, participants will answer a yes/no question if they have tested for HIV in the past 6 months. |
| HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision Past 6 Months at 12 Months | Assessed at 12 months | Number of participants who have gone through the intervention (self-tested for HIV with online supervision past 6 months). For the control group, participants will answer a yes/no question if they have tested for HIV in the past 6 months. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Prevalence of HIV Positive Among YMSM at Baseline | Assessed at baseline | Number of participants who are HIV-positive. For the intervention group (participants who performed HIV self-testing with online supervision in the past 6 months), HIV status is obtained from the supervised self-test results. For the control group, participants report their HIV status through the survey, based on whether they had an HIV test in the past 6 months. |
| Prevalence of HIV Positive Among YMSM at 6 Months | Assessed at 6 months | Number of participants who are HIV-positive. For the intervention group (participants who performed HIV self-testing with online supervision in the past 6 months), HIV status is obtained from the supervised self-test results. For the control group, participants report their HIV status through the survey, based on whether they had an HIV test in the past 6 months. |
| Prevalence of HIV Positive Among YMSM at 12 Months | Assessed at 12 months | Number of participants who are HIV-positive. For the intervention group (participants who performed HIV self-testing with online supervision in the past 6 months), HIV status is obtained from the supervised self-test results. For the control group, participants report their HIV status through the survey, based on whether they had an HIV test in the past 6 months. |
| HIV Incidence/Seroconversion at Baseline | Assessed at baseline | Number of participants with new HIV infections (seroconversion) during each follow-up period, reported as the number of cases. HIV status in the intervention group is obtained from supervised HIV self-testing, while in the control group it is self-reported through the survey. |
| HIV Incidence/Seroconversion at 6 Months | Assessed at 6 months | Number of participants with new HIV infections (seroconversion) during each follow-up period, reported as the number of cases. HIV status in the intervention group is obtained from supervised HIV self-testing, while in the control group it is self-reported through the survey. |
| HIV Incidence/Seroconversion at 12 Months | Assessed at 12 months | Number of participants with new HIV infections (seroconversion) during each follow-up period, reported as the number of cases. HIV status in the intervention group is obtained from supervised HIV self-testing, while in the control group it is self-reported through the survey. |
Countries
Vietnam
Contacts
Mahidol University
Hanoi Medical University
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Participants will be recruited over one year using online and offline outreach to reach YMSM in Ho Chi Minh City. Online recruitment will use social media, NGO networks, and youth networks. All survey respondents will receive a mobile top-up worth approximately 2 USD. Interested individuals will complete online eligibility screening and provide electronic informed consent (e-consent). Those testing HIV-positive will not join the pilot. The pilot will recruit 100 YMSM, randomized into a 50-person
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision Participants receive an HIV self-testing kit delivered to their home and complete the test with real-time online counselling and supervision by a nurse via Zalo. The nurse provides pre-test counselling, guides proper use of the kit, assists with result interpretation, and ensures confidentiality throughout the process. | 50 |
| Control Venue-based HIV testing | 50 |
| Total | 100 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Total | Control | HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 24.2 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 | 24.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.2 | 24.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.4 |
| Condom use at last anal intercourse | 49 Participants | 21 Participants | 28 Participants |
| Depression (CES-D-10) | 54 Participants | 27 Participants | 27 Participants |
| Participant has given or received items or opportunities in exchange for sex No | 84 Participants | 40 Participants | 44 Participants |
| Participant has given or received items or opportunities in exchange for sex Yes, I have both given and received money, things, opportunities and so on | 8 Participants | 6 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Participant has given or received items or opportunities in exchange for sex Yes, I was the one giving money, things, opportunities and so on | 2 Participants | 0 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Participant has given or received items or opportunities in exchange for sex Yes, I was the one receiving money, things, opportunities and so on | 6 Participants | 4 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Participation in group sex activities (ever) | 36 Participants | 17 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Vietnamese | 100 Participants | 50 Participants | 50 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Vietnam | 100 Participants | 50 Participants | 50 Participants |
| Risk of Suicide (SBQ-R) | 35 Participants | 21 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Self-Reporteed Last HIV Testing Data ≤ 6 months ago | 77 Participants | 44 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Self-Reporteed Last HIV Testing Data 7-12 months ago | 7 Participants | 1 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Self-Reporteed Last HIV Testing Data More than 12 months ago | 12 Participants | 3 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Self-Reporteed Last HIV Testing Data Never tested | 4 Participants | 2 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Bisexual Males | 6 Participants | 3 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Sex/Gender, Customized Males who have sex with Men | 94 Participants | 47 Participants | 47 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 50 | 0 / 50 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 50 | 0 / 50 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 50 | 0 / 50 |
Outcome results
HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision Past 6 Months at 12 Months
Number of participants who have gone through the intervention (self-tested for HIV with online supervision past 6 months). For the control group, participants will answer a yes/no question if they have tested for HIV in the past 6 months.
Time frame: Assessed at 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision | HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision Past 6 Months at 12 Months | 45 Participants |
| Control | HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision Past 6 Months at 12 Months | 35 Participants |
HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision Past 6 Months at 6 Months
Number of participants who have gone through the intervention (self-tested for HIV with online supervision past 6 months). For the control group, participants will answer a yes/no question if they have tested for HIV in the past 6 months.
Time frame: Assessed at 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision | HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision Past 6 Months at 6 Months | 46 Participants |
| Control | HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision Past 6 Months at 6 Months | 38 Participants |
HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision Past 6 Months at Baseline
Number of participants who have gone through the intervention (self-tested for HIV with online supervision past 6 months). For the control group, participants will answer a yes/no question if they have tested for HIV in the past 6 months.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision | HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision Past 6 Months at Baseline | 50 Participants |
| Control | HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision Past 6 Months at Baseline | 44 Participants |
HIV Incidence/Seroconversion at 12 Months
Number of participants with new HIV infections (seroconversion) during each follow-up period, reported as the number of cases. HIV status in the intervention group is obtained from supervised HIV self-testing, while in the control group it is self-reported through the survey.
Time frame: Assessed at 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision | HIV Incidence/Seroconversion at 12 Months | 0 Participants |
| Control | HIV Incidence/Seroconversion at 12 Months | 1 Participants |
HIV Incidence/Seroconversion at 6 Months
Number of participants with new HIV infections (seroconversion) during each follow-up period, reported as the number of cases. HIV status in the intervention group is obtained from supervised HIV self-testing, while in the control group it is self-reported through the survey.
Time frame: Assessed at 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision | HIV Incidence/Seroconversion at 6 Months | 0 Participants |
| Control | HIV Incidence/Seroconversion at 6 Months | 1 Participants |
HIV Incidence/Seroconversion at Baseline
Number of participants with new HIV infections (seroconversion) during each follow-up period, reported as the number of cases. HIV status in the intervention group is obtained from supervised HIV self-testing, while in the control group it is self-reported through the survey.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision | HIV Incidence/Seroconversion at Baseline | 2 Participants |
| Control | HIV Incidence/Seroconversion at Baseline | 0 Participants |
Prevalence of HIV Positive Among YMSM at 12 Months
Number of participants who are HIV-positive. For the intervention group (participants who performed HIV self-testing with online supervision in the past 6 months), HIV status is obtained from the supervised self-test results. For the control group, participants report their HIV status through the survey, based on whether they had an HIV test in the past 6 months.
Time frame: Assessed at 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision | Prevalence of HIV Positive Among YMSM at 12 Months | 0 Participants |
| Control | Prevalence of HIV Positive Among YMSM at 12 Months | 2 Participants |
Prevalence of HIV Positive Among YMSM at 6 Months
Number of participants who are HIV-positive. For the intervention group (participants who performed HIV self-testing with online supervision in the past 6 months), HIV status is obtained from the supervised self-test results. For the control group, participants report their HIV status through the survey, based on whether they had an HIV test in the past 6 months.
Time frame: Assessed at 6 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision | Prevalence of HIV Positive Among YMSM at 6 Months | 0 Participants |
| Control | Prevalence of HIV Positive Among YMSM at 6 Months | 1 Participants |
Prevalence of HIV Positive Among YMSM at Baseline
Number of participants who are HIV-positive. For the intervention group (participants who performed HIV self-testing with online supervision in the past 6 months), HIV status is obtained from the supervised self-test results. For the control group, participants report their HIV status through the survey, based on whether they had an HIV test in the past 6 months.
Time frame: Assessed at baseline
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| HIV Self-testing With Online Supervision | Prevalence of HIV Positive Among YMSM at Baseline | 2 Participants |
| Control | Prevalence of HIV Positive Among YMSM at Baseline | 0 Participants |