Skip to content

Measuring Oncological Value of Exercise and Statin

Syöpäpotilaan Ennusteen Parantaminen Muuttamalla syövän mikroympäristöä ja Metaboliaa Liikunnalla ja lääkkeellisesti - Measuring Oncological Value of Exercise and Statin

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05796973
Acronym
MOVES
Enrollment
240
Registered
2023-04-04
Start date
2023-03-31
Completion date
2027-12-31
Last updated
2025-06-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer, Kidney Cancer, Metastatic Breast Cancer, Metastatic Kidney Cancer, Metastatic Ovarian Cancer, Metastatic Ovary Cancer, Metastatic Prostate Adenocarcinoma, Metastatic Prostate Cancer, Metastatic Renal Cancer, Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma, Ovarian Cancer, Prostate Cancer

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to find out whether supervised physical exercise during cancer drug treatment improves the effectiveness of the treatment in metastasized breast, kidney, ovarian and prostate cancer compared to unsupervised exercise. In addition, the investigators are investigating whether the use of atorvastatin combined with guided group exercise training would further improve the response to cancer treatment.

Detailed description

Despite the marked differences between different malignancies' genetic, metabolic, and prognostic factors, hypoxia and adaptation of metabolic changes favoring hypoxic microenvironment are common factors in most solid tumors. Hypoxic microenvironment provides cancer cells multiple advantages: protection from immune system, somatic mutations leading to more aggressive form of cancer, and cancer cells that are adjusted to hypoxic conditions are more prone to form metastases. One possible mechanism for cancer cell to adjust to hypoxic microenvironment is related to lipid metabolism; lipids are known to accumulate into cancer cells in many cancer types. One of the most promising ways to reduce hypoxia in solid tumors is to increase physical exercise. Furthermore, tumors' lipid metabolism can be affected by treatment with cholesterol-lowering statins, which decreases serum cholesterol levels and inhibits cancer cells' own lipid synthesis. The aim of this randomized clinical trial is to investigate if supervised group exercise will improve response to cancer drug treatment in metastasized breast, kidney, prostate, and ovarian cancer compared to unsupervised exercise. The investigators will also evaluate if atorvastatin treatment in combination with guided group exercise can promote even better treatment responses than exercise alone. Exercise program includes aerobic and resistance training. This study is a randomized phase III study testing the research hypothesis for the first time in humans. A total of 240 cancer patients (n=60/cancer type) will be recruited into the study and randomized 1:1:1 into three different groups, i.e. 20 people in each group from each cancer type: 1. 3 months of supervised group exercise 2. 3 months of supervised group exercise and at the same time atorvastatin 40 mg/day 3. to a control group that exercises voluntarily without guidance. In addition, as a separate group, a total of 160 cancer patients (40/cancer type) who are already using statin medication will be recruited for the study and randomized 1:1 into two groups: 1) 3 months of supervised group exercise and 2) independent exercise (a control group that exercises voluntarily without guidance). Before the study begins, the patients are informed orally and in writing about the study. The patients who agree to participate in the study sign an informed consent. The patient follow-up time in each group is two years in 3 months intervals (first visit and 8 follow-up visits) in conjunction with standard cancer treatment follow-up visits. Blood and urine samples and questionnaire data are collected at baseline and at each follow-up visit. Body composition and physical performance are measured at baseline and twice after the intervention. Patients QoL and experiences of exercise are measured in qualitative interviews (in the group participating the qualitative sub-study). The main response variables are 1. cancer progression during cancer treatment based on imaging, symptoms or laboratory findings and 2. mortality of the patients. The other variables of interest in this study are: 3. Hypoxia markers 4. Tolerability of treatment 5. Body composition 6. Physical performance 7. The extent of hypoxia, as measured by PET scans, in participants of the sub-study 4\) Quality of life, perceived pain, depressive symptoms, nutrition and relationships. Adverse events from cancer treatment and treatment interruptions are also monitored.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALGuided physical exercise

Patients will be participating in guided physical exercise program regularly two times / week at a sports facility and guided by a professional trainer. They will participate in aerobic and resistance exercises during the sessions.

DRUGAtorvastatin

Patients will be participating in guided physical exercise program regularly two times / week at a sports facility and guided by a professional trainer. They will participate in aerobic and resistance exercises during the sessions. In addition to the exercise program they will be given atorvastatin 40 mg QD medication.

OTHERIndependent exercise

The control group is advised of the benefits of physical exercise and they get an exercise program to follow. Participants in the control group exercise on their own.

Sponsors

Tampere University
CollaboratorOTHER
Aalto University
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Helsinki
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Turku
CollaboratorOTHER
Tampere University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The patients are randomized equally into three groups: 1/3 into guided exercise group, 1/3 into guided exercise and statin-treatment group and 1/3 into non-guided exercise group

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient has metastatic prostate cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer or kidney cancer confirmed histologically and by imaging, for which 1st-line cancer drug treatment is started * Prostate cancer: First course of docetaxel treatment or second-generation antiandrogen treatment for metastatic prostate cancer. * Breast cancer: First-line medical treatment of metastatic breast cancer regardless of hormone receptor status. * Kidney cancer: Kidney cancer, for which 1st-line cancer drug treatment is started as tki monotherapy and/or IO monotherapy or as a combination therapy. * Ovarian cancer: stage III or IV cancer for which chemotherapy treatment is started. * The patient agrees to the study and signs a written informed consent. * Adult (18 years=\>) women (breast, ovarian and kidney cancer) and men (prostate and kidney cancer) are recruited for the study. * In women, the use of a reliable contraceptive during the intervention

Exclusion criteria

* High risk of bone fractures * Inability to physical exertion and/or unsuitability for cancer drug treatment * Poor co-operation ability for psychological reasons * Active use of cholesterol-lowering drugs * Severe liver or kidney failure * Troublesome side effects that occurred in the past during cholesterol medication * Continuous use of medicinal substances that interact with atorvastatin during the study period * A special group of subjects according to the EU Clinical Trials Regulation 536/2014 (e.g. pregnant or lactating women)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to cancer progressionFrom randomization until the date of first documented progression, assessed at twelve week intervals up to 24 monthsRadiological progression • Radiological progression of the disease according to RECIST criteria (version 1.1.) compared to the situation at the start of cancer treatment in all cancer types. If the cancer treatment includes the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, the imRECIST criteria are applied to evaluate the response In addition, the disease is considered advanced if both of the criteria below are met: * Biochemical progression: * PSA progression in prostate cancer, (three consecutive PSA increases measured at least one week apart, two \> 50% increases from the lowest PSA level and PSA \> 2 ng/ml) with testosterone at castration level (\< 50 ng/ml or 1.7 nmol/l) * Ca15-3 marker increase in breast cancer (three consecutive marker increases that the clinician considers significant) * In ovarian cancer, ca12-5 marker increase (three consecutive marker increases that the clinician considers significant) * Clinical progression o ECOG 3 or less (long-term)
MortalityFrom randomization until the date of death, assessed up to 24 monthsTime to death from the beginning of the first-line medication

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hypoxia markers in serum (VEGF, HIF1-alpha, carboanhydrase IX, LADH)At baseline and at 3 monthsHypoxia markers in the serum
Tolerability of treatmentFrom date of randomization, assessed at twelve week intervals up to 24 monthsIncidence of grade 3 or worse adverse events during cancer treatment
Fat/muscle ratio as measured with impedance testAt baseline and at 3 and 6 monthsBody composition measurement before and after the intervention
Physical performance with standardized muscle strength testsAt baseline and at 3 and 6 monthsMuscle strength tested with three standardized tests (squat test, core dynamic strength test, biceps flexion test) before and after the intervention.
Changes in tissue hypoxiaAt baseline and at 3 monthsThe amount of hypoxia in cancer foci determined by PET-CT scan using specific hypoxia-sensitive tracers in a sub-study
Changes in quality of lifeAt baseline and at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months, 21 months and 24 monthsEORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire to measure quality of life, score from 0 to 100. A high scale score for a functional scale represents a higher level of functioning, a high score for a symptom scale represents higher level of symptoms.
Depressive symptomsAt baseline and at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months, 21 months and 24 monthsPatient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), score from 0 (no depression) to 27 (severe depression).
Severity of painAt baseline and at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months, 21 months and 24 monthsThe severity of pain and its impact on functioning. Brief Pain Inventory questionnaire including 9 items. Pain severity scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), pain interference from 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes).
Nutritional statusAt baseline and at 3 months, 6 months, 9 months, 12 months, 15 months, 18 months, 21 months and 24 monthsMini Nutritional Assessment (MNA) questionnaire. A score of 7 or less (malnutrition) to 24-30 (normal nutrition).
Relationship satisfactionAt baseline and at three months, twelve months and 24 moths.The relationship questionnaire consists of two previously used, validated measures: Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS) and Marital Communication Inventory.

Countries

Finland

Contacts

Primary ContactTeemu Murtola, MD PhD Prof
teemu.murtola@tuni.fi03-311611
Backup ContactJorma Sormunen, MD PhD MBA
jorma.sormunen@fimnet.fi0505001869

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 7, 2026