Skip to content

Randomized Control Trial Comparing CMPAT and MAT for Lumbar Puncture

Computerized Modified Paramedian Approach Technique(CMPAT) Versus Conventional Midline Approach Technique(MAT) of Lumbar Puncture: A Randomized Control Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05795075
Enrollment
84
Registered
2023-04-03
Start date
2023-06-30
Completion date
2024-06-30
Last updated
2023-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

a Randomized Controlled Trial

Brief summary

The lumbar puncture (LP) technique is a widely utilized method for diagnosis and treatment purposes. Recently, the paramedian approach technique (PAT) has garnered increasing interest due to its advantages over the midline approach technique (MAT), which has traditionally been used for LP in clinical practice . Utilizing digital virtual human and computer simulation techniques, a new path has been proposed for the computerized modified paramedian approach technique (CMPAT). As such, the objective of the present study is to present a randomized controlled trial (RCT) protocol to investigate and compare the effects of CMPAT versus MAT in patients requiring LP.

Interventions

PROCEDUREComputerized Modified Paramedian Approach Technique

Computerized Modified Paramedian Approach Technique ( CMPAT )

Conventional Midline Approach Technique

Sponsors

Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

The involvement of patients and the public was not or will not be included in the design, implementation, reporting or dissemination of the research.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18-70 years. Indication for LP.(Diagnostic lumbar puncture:Cerebrospinal fluid composition analysis,Cerebrospinal fluid pressure measurement;Cerebrospinal fluid release or lumbar Contiuous drainage of fluid,Intrathecal injection of lumbar cistern, etc.) Informed consent. Sufficient knowledge of the Chinese language to complete forms and follow instructions independently.

Exclusion criteria

* Cerebral hernia or high Cerebrospinal fluid pressure that might lead to Cerebral hernia. Treatment with oral anticoagulant or anti-small plate(3 days or less)or coagulation disorders, various factors leading to a higher risk of bleeding. Local infection or skin breakdown. Previous surgery on Lumbar spine segments. Pregnancy or lactation Severe somatic or psychiatric illness.(Severe anxiety or depression, etc.) Failure to be followed up as needed or worries about the potential risks of the study. Failure to provide written informed consent or follow the protocol requirements. Expected survival time being less than 1 month. Plan to emigrate within 1 month. Other conditions that are unsuitable for clinical research.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Number of puncture attempts in case of successful LP1 day
LP success rate1 day

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026