Skip to content

We Are an Active Family: Promoting Child Physical Activity Through Social Identity Formation in the Family System

We Are an Active Family: Promoting Child Physical Activity Through Social Identity Formation in the Family System

Status
Recruiting
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05794789
Enrollment
148
Registered
2023-04-03
Start date
2023-08-10
Completion date
2026-03-31
Last updated
2025-04-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Physical Activity, Social Identity

Keywords

Moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), Childhood obesity, Type 2 Diabetes, Identity formation

Brief summary

The purpose of our study is to explore the effectiveness of physical activity (PA) identity formation in the family system as a promotor of long-term PA. The primary research question is: Does a family identity formation condition (with education+planning) result in increased child moderate- to vigorous-intensity PA (MVPA) compared to a standard comparison education and planning condition at six months? Hypothesis: Child MVPA will be higher for the identity formation condition in comparison to the more standard PA education+planning condition at six months.

Detailed description

The secondary research questions will include: 1. Does the identity formation condition improve child health-related fitness outcomes compared to the education and planning condition at six months? Hypothesis: Child health-related fitness will be higher for the identity formation condition in comparison to the education and planning condition. 2. Can group differences among behavioural, and health-related fitness outcomes be explained through a mediation model? Hypothesis: The covariance of the assigned conditions (identity formation, planning + education) on child MVPA will be explained by parental support, and through parental support identity (i.e., manipulation check). In turn, the covariance between support and health-related outcomes will be explained by MVPA among conditions. In the case of null outcomes for research question #1, the investigators will instead explore a prediction model of these variables rather than a mediation model. 3. Is there an intergenerational, seasonal, or sex difference across primary outcomes by assigned condition? Hypothesis: Parents in the identity formation condition will show higher physical activity via some activities being performed with their children (as part of social identity) in comparison to the other condition. No differences in child sex or season are hypothesized based on past research.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSocial Identity

This group will receive the same content as the education+planning as well as two additional sessions. This includes short overviews of the benefits of PA as a family, brainstorming how a family can each assist each other in PA, and an activity for developing a family PA action plan. Behavior change techniques such as identity salience, identity similarity, and identity fit and contrast are included in the coaching session include. This will be supplemented by an organization of fun family PA roles for all members (e.g., activity planner, goal setter, supporter, etc.) to instill involvement as well as items (creation of a family PA t-shirt, family PA photos and display, etc.) to instill distinctiveness, which is a central feature of a social identity. Worksheets and discussion will be included. The second session will involve only the parent(s) to focus on parental support identity and the content is based on the behavior change principles of self-identity theory.

Sponsors

Diabetes Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Victoria
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants will be at least one parent with at least one child between the ages of 6 and 12 years. * Families (parents and/or guardians and children) residing in Greater Victoria, Nanaimo, Ladysmith, Duncan, Vancouver, Richmond, Surrey, Burnaby, British Columbia. * Children that participate in \<60 minutes/day of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA)

Exclusion criteria

* If child is meeting the current physical activity guidelines \>=60 minutes a day of moderate to vigorous physical activity per day. * If participant does not pass Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire (PARQ)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline in children's moderate to vigorous physical activity to 6 monthsBaseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 monthsChildren's physical activity will be quantified by accelerometry. Children will wear an accelerometer for a minimum of 6 hours per day for 7 days at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Parent-child intergenerational activity measured via parent self-reportBaseline - 6 monthsFor self-reported PA, the the Godin Leisure-Time Exercise Questionnaire will be used.
Body Composition - WeightBaseline - 6 monthsWeight (kg)
Body Composition - HeightBaseline - 6 monthsHeight (cm)
Body Composition - Waist CircumferenceBaseline - 6 monthsWaist circumference (cm)
Body Composition - Percentage Body FatBaseline - 6 monthsPercentage body fat will be measured using a bioelectric impedance scale
Cardiovascular Fitness (ie: predicted maximal aerobic power)Baseline - 6 monthsWill be assessed during a submaximal exercise test called the mCAFT Step Test
Musculoskeletal FitnessBaseline - 6 monthsMeasured using grip strength
Parent-child intergenerational activity via seven-day accelerometryBaseline - 6 monthsAccelerometer model has a Bluetooth proximity detection feature that can determine the presence (e.g., same room in a house, at the park together) or absence of close proximity between two accelerometers. The outcome variable will be average minutes per day parents and children were both engaging in physical activity at the same time while in close proximity.
Musculoskeletal PowerBaseline - 6 monthsMeasured doing vertical jump test
Musculoskeletal FlexibilityBaseline - 6 monthsMeasured doing sit and reach test
The Multi-Process Action Control (MPAC) Constructs - Instrumental AttitudeBaseline - 6 monthsMeasured by standardized measurement scale - 1-7 Likert-type scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree)
The Multi-Process Action Control (MPAC) Constructs - Affective JudgementsBaseline - 6 monthsMeasured by standardized measurement scale - 1-7 Likert-type scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree)
The Multi-Process Action Control (MPAC) Constructs - Perceived CapabilityBaseline - 6 monthsMeasured by standardized measurement scale - 1-7 Likert-type scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree)
The Multi-Process Action Control (MPAC) Constructs - Perceived OpportunityBaseline - 6 monthsMeasured by standardized measurement scale - 1-7 Likert-type scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree)
Social IdentityBaseline - 6 monthsMeasured by standardized measurement scale - 1-7 Likert-type scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree)
Musculoskeletal EnduranceBaseline - 6 monthsMeasured doing curl ups and push ups

Countries

Canada

Contacts

Primary ContactEvie Streight, MSc.
bml@uvic.ca250 472 5288
Backup ContactSandy Courtnall
bml@uvic.ca

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 6, 2026