Skip to content

Virtual Reality Training for Aphasia Rehabilitation

Anomias Rehabilitation Training Through 360° Videos

Status
Suspended
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05793879
Acronym
Aphasia360
Enrollment
40
Registered
2023-03-31
Start date
2023-05-02
Completion date
2026-03-01
Last updated
2026-03-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anomic Aphasia

Keywords

virtual reality, embodied cognition, rehabilitation

Brief summary

Aphasia is an acquired deficit following acute damage to the central nervous system that involves the difficulty or impossibility of understanding and formulating language. A typical disorder of non-fluent forms of aphasia is anomia. Anomia refers to the difficulty in finding words, in particular when trying to name objects and actions. According to the Embodied Cognition approach (EC), language is tightly connected to the motor system. In this view, language rehabilitation programs should stimulate language through the activation of the motor system. In this approach, since anomic deficits are often due to a weak link between the meaning of the word and its lemma, the Hebbs' principles of coincident and correlated learning can be exploited, i.e., by intensifying the synchronous activation of lexicon and semantics and connecting them with the motor counterpart. In this study, the investigators present an innovative training, based on the EC framework, in which they will make use of new technologies for anomia rehabilitation in post-stroke patients. Specifically, the researchers will use immersive 360° videos representing everyday actions displayed from the first-person point of view, experienced through a head-mounted display. The training will be administered 3 times a week for 4 weeks. The control group will watch standard videos representing the same actions recorded from the third-person perspective. Naming abilities will be tested before and after the training together with other cognitive and psychological measures. The investigators expect that the group who will undergo the 360° video-based training will show greater improvement of performance compared to the control group.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALVideo 360

Patients will undergo 12 sessions, 3 per weeks, 4 weeks

BEHAVIORALStandard videos

Patients will undergo 12 sessions, 3 per weeks, 4 weeks

Sponsors

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Lead SponsorOTHER
Fondazione Poliambulanza
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* naming disorder in the post-acute phase (index event occurring at least 6 months earlier) * to have already received rehabilitation treatment in the acute phase * noun naming below cut-off * verbs naming below cut- off

Exclusion criteria

* concomitant or pre-existing (with respect to the index event) neurological and psychiatric deficits * epilepsy * balance disorders * neglect

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of verbs and objects correctly namedpost treatment, 1 monthAll the trained videos will be presented and the patient will be asked to name the verb and the object depicted. The accuracy will be registered

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Batteria per l'Analisi dei Deficit Afasici (BADA), naming subtestpost treatment, 1 monthIt is an Italian validated neuropsychological battery aiming at testing all the language abilities. It includes several tests tapping into the different linguistic abilities, but for the purpose of the present study only the verb and object naming subtest will be administered. Higher scores indicate greater naming abilities
EuroQol Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L)post treatment, 1 monthThe test consists of 2 sections. The first one is made of 5 questions scored from 1 to 5 points each. The final score ranges from 5 to 15, where the lesser the better. The second section is a visual scale on which the best state the patient can imagine is marked 100 and the worst state is marked 0.
Functional Outcome Questionnaire (FOQ-A)post treatment, 1 monthThe survey is administered to the caregiver. It includes 32 questions each scored from 1 to 5 points. The final scores ranges from 32 to 160, where higher scores indicate greater communication abilities

Countries

Italy

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORClaudia Repetto, Prof

Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026