Skip to content

Role of Respiratory Rate Derived From Capnography in Sedated Patients

Is Respiratory Rate Derived From Capnography Can Prevent Adverse Events Occurred in Sedated Patients.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05793658
Enrollment
74
Registered
2023-03-31
Start date
2022-11-25
Completion date
2023-02-20
Last updated
2023-03-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sedation Problems

Keywords

Sedation, capnography, Respiratory rate, colonoscopy

Brief summary

Although appropriate sedation is recommended during colonoscopy, patients are at risk for adverse events e.g hypoventilation and hypoxemia due to inadvertent oversedation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefit of additional quantitative capnography monitoring ( respiratory rate )in management of patient undergoing colonoscopy under sedation in preventing or reducing the incidence of adverse events and also determine when to start the procedure and when to give and not to give increments of sedative drugs during the procedure.

Interventions

PROCEDUREStandard capnography

Patients undergoing colonoscopy under sedation were randomly assigned to receive standard capnography monitoring or modified capnography monitoring which can be achieved by tucking capnography probe under the face mask.74 patients were enrolled. Patient characteristics were well balanced between the two groups 37 patients in each group.

PROCEDUREModified capnography

If Respiratory rate below 14 b/m: more sedation isn't not advised and the patient may develop airway obstruction and needs airway intervention ( like jaw thrust or oral airway) If respiratory rate more than 20 b/m it means this patient is prone to awake or to move and this patient in need for incremental dose of sedative drug ( e.g 20 to 30 mg propofol) Also roughly speaking respiratory rate from 16 to 18 b/m is the target

Sponsors

Al Jedaani Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ASA 1 and 2 adult patients * Age from 20 to 50 years old * elective colonoscopy

Exclusion criteria

* American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) above Class II * History of psychiatric or neurological disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hypoxemia1 hoursDetected by pulse oximeter

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient movements during the procedure1 hourMeasured by questionnaire to the gastroenterologist (scale from 1 to 5)
Effort exerted by the anesthesiologist ( the provider)1 hourMeasured by questionnaire ( scale from 1 to 5 )
Patient satisfaction1 hourMeasured by questionnaire ( scale from 1 to 5 )
Gastroenterologist satisfaction1 hourMeasured by questionnaire ( scale from 1 to 5 )

Countries

Saudi Arabia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026