Skip to content

INF108F in Infants With Food Protein Induced Proctocolitis

Restoring Gut Health With INF108F in Infants With Food Protein Induced Allergic Proctocolitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05793112
Acronym
RESTORE
Enrollment
20
Registered
2023-03-31
Start date
2023-09-09
Completion date
2024-09-27
Last updated
2026-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Food Protein Induced Allergic Proctocolitis, Gut Microbiome, Infant Development

Brief summary

Single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trail evaluating INF108F in breastfed infants with FPIAP

Detailed description

This is a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with two arms evaluating IBF108F in breastfed infants with FPIAP. Assessments will be conducted over a 4-week study period with assessment of blood in stool, infant stooling, sleep, feeding, and growth. Safety will be evaluated through collection adverse events.

Interventions

DRUGINF108F probiotic

Oral suspension

DRUGPlacebo

Oral suspension

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to 90 Days
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Infants, male or female, of all ethnic/racial groups, with a gestational period of 37 to 42 weeks * Infants aged 1 - 90 days old with a documented FPIAP with either gross blood or microscopic blood in without other possible causes * Infants must be exclusively breastfed or at least half of oral intake is from breast feeding or from expressed breast milk * A willing parent or legal guardian will sign the consent form either electronically or with a wet ink signature

Exclusion criteria

* Infants born earlier than 37 weeks of gestation * Infants who are exclusively formula-fed or less than half of oral intake is from breastfeeding or from expressed breast milk at the time of enrollment * Infants born with medical complications (i.e., neurological, cerebral palsy, confirmed food allergies) * Diagnosis of other severe or complicating medical problems, including autoimmune or chronic immune inflammatory conditions, gastrointestinal inflammatory conditions, or renal insufficiency * History of abdominal surgery or congenital abnormalities of the GI track, the cardiovascular system, the pulmonary system or the renal system * Antibiotic use (oral or systemic) within 7 days prior to enrollment * Mother's intent to feed non-study probiotics or solid food to their infant at any time during the study * Mothers with substance use disorder (SUD) or on Nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) * Infants who have consumed any B. infantis-containing probiotics since birth

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes to Gut Microbiome CompositionBaseline to Day 28Absolute change from baseline in relative abundance of B. infantis INF108F to Study Day 28 via metagenomics results in mITT population. Unit measured: The absolute change from baseline in the percentage of sequenced reads assigned to B. infantis INF108F (calculated as value at Day 28 - value at baseline).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes to Clinical Symptoms of FPIAPBaseline to day 28We will collect information using questionnaires about infants' gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms, feeding, sleep and stool frequency and consistency. The severity of infant GER will be quantified using the Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (I-GERQ), with numeric scores. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 25; scores \>7 provide 74% specificity and 94% sensitivity for diagnosing GERD. Higher I-GERQ scores/values are indicative of worse outcomes, worse reflux symptoms for the infant. The secondary outcome was reported as the absolute change from baseline in I-GERQ score; therefore, a higher value would be positive as the score is reduced significantly from baseline, which means reflux symptoms were improved.
Percentage of Infants With no Gross/Visible Blood in Stool on Study Day 14 Via the Daily LogEnrollment to Study Day 14Analysis of the key secondary endpoints will be completed based on the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population. The mITT population will include all infants who are randomized and receive at least one supplementation. Infants will be analyzed according to the group to which they are randomized.
Percentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogBaseline, Study Day 7, Study Day 14, Study Day 28The sleep will be captured using Infant Sleep Questionnaire, with 0-10 scales, 0 means worst sleep and 10 means excellent sleep for quantify the quality of infant's night sleep. Analysis of the key secondary endpoints will be completed based on the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population. The mITT population will include all infants who are randomized and receive at least one supplementation. Infants will be analyzed according to the group to which they are randomized.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Breastfed infants with FPIAP, w/ either grossly visible bloody stool or microscopic bloody stools, excl. other causes, will be recruited at PNW or MGH Pediatric GI clinic. They will be provided basic information about the study. We will ask potential participants to provide basic contact information and answer some study-specific questions as a pre-qualifier. Individuals who are interested to learn more will receive more details about the study, the informed consent, and study team contacts.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
INF108F
INF108F
10
Placebo
Placebo
10
Total20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalINF108FPlacebo
Acid reflux medication taken after baby was born6 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Age, Customized
Age at Enrollment in weeks
9.3 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.02
9.2 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.29
9.4 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.72
Age, Customized
Age at First Physical Exam in weeks
9.25 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.88
9.1 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.38
9.4 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.27
Age, Customized
Gestational Age at Birth in weeks
39.55 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.96
39.55 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.997
39.55 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.923
Baby ever consumed infant formula
No
10 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Baby ever consumed infant formula
Yes
10 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Baby ever consumed infant probiotics
No
15 Participants9 Participants6 Participants
Baby ever consumed infant probiotics
Yes
5 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Baby ever consumed iron supplements
No
20 Participants10 Participants10 Participants
Baby ever consumed iron supplements
Yes
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Baby ever consumed solid food
No
20 Participants10 Participants10 Participants
Baby ever consumed solid food
Yes
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Birth Mode
C-section
6 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Birth Mode
Vaginal
14 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Delivered in a Hospital20 Participants10 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
20 Participants10 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Father ever had any type of allergy
No
12 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Father ever had any type of allergy
Yes
8 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Highest education of either parent in home is Bachelor's or Advanced degree20 Participants10 Participants10 Participants
Maternal antibiotic exposure during labor/delivery
No
12 Participants6 Participants6 Participants
Maternal antibiotic exposure during labor/delivery
Unknown
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Maternal antibiotic exposure during labor/delivery
Yes
6 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Mother ever consumed medication to treat acid reflux of GERD
No
7 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
Mother ever consumed medication to treat acid reflux of GERD
Yes
13 Participants7 Participants6 Participants
Mother ever had any type of allergy
No
15 Participants9 Participants6 Participants
Mother ever had any type of allergy
Yes
5 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
6 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
11 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
8 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants5 Participants7 Participants
Singleton delivery20 Participants10 Participants10 Participants
Type of Acid Reflux medication consumed
Famotidine
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Type of Acid Reflux medication consumed
Mylanta
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Type of Acid Reflux medication consumed
None
17 Participants9 Participants8 Participants
Type of allergy (father)
Allergic rhinitis
4 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Type of allergy (father)
Asthma
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Type of allergy (father)
Eczema
4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Type of allergy (father)
Food allergy
4 Participants3 Participants1 Participants
Type of allergy (father)
None
6 Participants0 Participants6 Participants
Type of allergy (mother)
Allergic rhinitis
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Type of allergy (mother)
Asthma
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Type of allergy (mother)
Eczema
4 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Type of allergy (mother)
Food allergy
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Type of allergy (mother)
None
13 Participants8 Participants5 Participants
Weight at birth3.37 kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.51
3.18 kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.527
3.56 kilograms (kg)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.417

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 100 / 10
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 106 / 10
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 100 / 10

Outcome results

Primary

Changes to Gut Microbiome Composition

Absolute change from baseline in relative abundance of B. infantis INF108F to Study Day 28 via metagenomics results in mITT population. Unit measured: The absolute change from baseline in the percentage of sequenced reads assigned to B. infantis INF108F (calculated as value at Day 28 - value at baseline).

Time frame: Baseline to Day 28

Population: There will be two analysis populations defined for this study. Analysis of the primary, key secondary, and other secondary endpoints will be completed on the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population. All safety-related tabulations will be based upon the Safety population. The mITT population will include all infants who are randomized and receive at least one supplementation of the intervention. Infants will be analyzed according to the group to which they are randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
INF108FChanges to Gut Microbiome Composition42.816 Change in %B.infantis reads (Day 28-BL)Standard Deviation 53.236
PlaceboChanges to Gut Microbiome Composition-12.413 Change in %B.infantis reads (Day 28-BL)Standard Deviation 35.104
p-value: 0.154Wilcoxon range sum test
Secondary

Changes to Clinical Symptoms of FPIAP

We will collect information using questionnaires about infants' gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms, feeding, sleep and stool frequency and consistency. The severity of infant GER will be quantified using the Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire (I-GERQ), with numeric scores. The minimum score is 0 and the maximum score is 25; scores \>7 provide 74% specificity and 94% sensitivity for diagnosing GERD. Higher I-GERQ scores/values are indicative of worse outcomes, worse reflux symptoms for the infant. The secondary outcome was reported as the absolute change from baseline in I-GERQ score; therefore, a higher value would be positive as the score is reduced significantly from baseline, which means reflux symptoms were improved. The sleep will be captured using Infant Sleep Questionnaire, with 0-10 scales, 0 means worst sleep and 10 means excellent sleep for quantify the quality of infant's night sleep.

Time frame: Baseline to day 28

Population: Analysis of the key secondary endpoints will be completed based on the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population. The mITT population will include all infants who are randomized and receive at least one supplementation. Infants will be analyzed according to the group to which they are randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
INF108FChanges to Clinical Symptoms of FPIAP-5.5 Scores on a scale
PlaceboChanges to Clinical Symptoms of FPIAP0.0 Scores on a scale
p-value: 0.073Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Percentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly Log

Analysis of the key secondary endpoints will be completed based on the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population. The mITT population will include all infants who are randomized and receive at least one supplementation. Infants will be analyzed according to the group to which they are randomized.

Time frame: Baseline, Study Day 7, Study Day 14, Study Day 28

Population: Analysis of the key secondary endpoints will be completed based on the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population. The mITT population will include all infants who are randomized and receive at least one supplementation. Infants will be analyzed according to the group to which they are randomized.

ArmMeasureGroupCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 14A moderate problem0 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 7A small problem2 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 14A serious problem0 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 0 (Baseline)A very small problem1 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 14Missing0 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 7A moderate problem0 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 21Not a problem at all2 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 0 (Baseline)Missing0 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 21A very small problem4 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 7A serious problem0 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 21A small problem1 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 0 (Baseline)A moderate problem3 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 21A moderate problem2 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 7Missing0 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 21A serious problem0 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 7Not a problem at all1 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 21Missing1 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 14Not a problem at all2 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 28Not a problem at all3 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 0 (Baseline)A small problem4 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 28A very small problem3 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 14A very small problem3 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 28A small problem2 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 7A very small problem7 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 28A moderate problem2 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 14A small problem5 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 28A serious problem0 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 0 (Baseline)A serious problem0 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 28Missing0 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 0 (Baseline)Not a problem at all2 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 28Missing0 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 0 (Baseline)Not a problem at all5 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 0 (Baseline)A very small problem3 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 0 (Baseline)A small problem1 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 0 (Baseline)A moderate problem1 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 0 (Baseline)A serious problem0 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 0 (Baseline)Missing0 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 7Not a problem at all6 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 7A very small problem3 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 7A small problem0 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 7A moderate problem1 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 7A serious problem0 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 7Missing0 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 14Not a problem at all6 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 14A very small problem2 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 14A small problem1 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 14A moderate problem1 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 14A serious problem0 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 14Missing0 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 21Not a problem at all6 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 21A very small problem3 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 21A small problem0 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 21A moderate problem1 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 21A serious problem0 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 21Missing0 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 28Not a problem at all6 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 28A very small problem2 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 28A small problem0 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 28A moderate problem2 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants Within Each Category of 'Do You Consider Your Baby's Sleep a Problem?' (Not a Problem at All, a Very Small Problem, a Small Problem, a Moderate Problem, a Serious Problem) at Baseline and Study Days 7, 14, and 28 Via the Weekly LogDay 28A serious problem0 Participants
Comparison: Day 0 (Baseline)p-value: 0.057Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Day 7p-value: 0.169Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Day 14p-value: 0.168Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Day 21p-value: 0.139Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Comparison: Day 28p-value: 0.348Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Infants With no Gross/Visible Blood in Stool on Study Day 14 Via the Daily Log

Analysis of the key secondary endpoints will be completed based on the modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population. The mITT population will include all infants who are randomized and receive at least one supplementation. Infants will be analyzed according to the group to which they are randomized.

Time frame: Enrollment to Study Day 14

Population: Percentage of infants with no gross/visible blood in stool on Study Day 14 via the daily log

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
INF108FPercentage of Infants With no Gross/Visible Blood in Stool on Study Day 14 Via the Daily LogGross/visible blood in stool on Day 140 Participants
INF108FPercentage of Infants With no Gross/Visible Blood in Stool on Study Day 14 Via the Daily LogNo gross/visible blood in stool on Day 1410 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants With no Gross/Visible Blood in Stool on Study Day 14 Via the Daily LogGross/visible blood in stool on Day 142 Participants
PlaceboPercentage of Infants With no Gross/Visible Blood in Stool on Study Day 14 Via the Daily LogNo gross/visible blood in stool on Day 148 Participants
p-value: 0.471Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026