Skip to content

Phrenic Nerve Infiltration in Fibromyalgia

Phrenic Afferences In Organic and Metabolic Illness: Central Sensitization - Fibromyalgia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05792774
Enrollment
60
Registered
2023-03-31
Start date
2023-04-03
Completion date
2024-02-19
Last updated
2024-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Fibromyalgia

Keywords

phrenic nerve, anesthesia, local, anesthetics, Pain, Bupivacaine

Brief summary

It is known that nociceptive afferences in visceral pain and visceral disorders increase sensitization in subjects suffering from fibromyalgia. These patients use to present visceral comorbidities. Those comorbidities include that of peridiaphragmatic organs, which are supplied by the phrenic nerve among other innervations. It is known that peridiaphragmatic organs trigger referred pain in the neck area, via the phrenic nerves. So, the phrenic nociceptive afferences can be contributing to enhance the state of sensitization in fibromyalgia. This study aims to analyze the ability of phrenic nerve infiltration to diminish sensitization in subjects suffering fibromyalgia, by means of a randomized controlled trial.

Detailed description

Fibromyalgia is a major problem due to issues such as the impact on quality of life and the associated health and social costs. It is characterized by a generalized state of sensitization, with a high level of perceived pain, among other features. Peripheral pain sources potentially exacerbate the central sensitization and its symptoms of chronic diffuse musculoskeletal pain and hyperalgesia. It has been shown that visceral pain enhances the level of central sensitization typical of the syndrome. So, it has been claimed that systematic assessment and treatment of visceral pain comorbidities should be a part of the management strategy in fibromyalgia. Patients with fibromyalgia present visceral comorbidities. Those comorbidities include that of peridiaphragmatic organs, which are supplied by the phrenic nerve among other innervations. It is known that peridiaphragmatic organs trigger referred pain in the neck area, via the phrenic nerves. So, the phrenic nociceptive afferences can be contributing to enhance the state of sensitization in fibromyalgia. This study aims to analyze the ability of phrenic nerve infiltration to diminish sensitization in subjects suffering fibromyalgia. For this purpose, the investigators intend to perform a randomized clinical trial, assessing the effects on pain threshold to pressure, visual analogue scale, range of motion and fibromyalgia specific questionnaires. There will be only one intervention session. The experimental group will receive an ultrasound-guided anaesthetic infiltration of the phrenic nerve, while the control group will receive a placebo infiltration. A one-week follow-up, with intermediate measurements, will be carried out to assess the evolution of sensitization and symptomatology. The results of this study will make it possible to establish the role of phrenic afferences in fibromyalgia sensitization, thus making it possible to specify a specific therapeutic target (phrenic nerve) as well as the importance of visceral treatment in subjects with fibromyalgia.

Interventions

DRUGBupivacain

The experimental intervention will consist of ultrasound-guided anesthetic blockade of the phrenic nerve at the laterocervical supraclavicular level with 1 ml of lidocaine without vasoconstrictor 2% to infiltrate the skin and 3ml of bupivacaine without vasoconstrictor 0.25% for neural blockade, making the local anesthetic surround the nerve between the anterior scalene muscle and the sternocleidomastoid muscle.

The placebo intervention will be similar in relation to 2% lidocaine without vasoconstrictor for the skin, but an ultrasound-guided puncture will be performed at the level of the subcutaneous cellular tissue by injecting 3 ml of physiological saline.

Sponsors

University of Seville
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 64 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Women * Over 18 and under 64 years old * Diagnosis of Fibromyalgia * Any peridiaphragmatic visceral disorder diagnosed by the respective specialist. * That the subject agrees to participate in the project by signing the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Other rheumatic diseases. * Degenerative neurological disease. * Major psychiatric disorder * Cognitive deterioration * Non-cooperative subject * Any medical condition affecting sensory evaluation * Contraindication to infiltration of the phrenic nerve.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
AlgometryPre-intervention. Post-intervention: 1 hour, 3 days and 7 daysPressure pain threshold in the specific 18 tender points in fibromyalgia. PPT levels defined as the minimum necessary pressure to evoke pain will be evaluated using a handheld electronic pressure algometer. Change from baseline in algometry.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient Global Impression of ImprovementPre-intervention. Post-intervention: 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours, 9 hours, 24 hours, 2 days, 3 days and 7 daysPatient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-Improvement) scale, ranging from 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). It will be assessed verbally.
Numeric Pain Rating ScalePre-intervention. Post-intervention: 1 hour, 3 hours, 6 hours, 9 hours, 24 hours, 2 days, 3 days and 7 daysPerceived pain. Self-perceived pain intensity will be evaluated by a 0 to 10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), where 0 denotes no pain and 10 denotes the maximum possible pain.
Fibromyalgia Survey QuestionnairePre-intervention. Post-intervention: 7 days.Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire (Questionnaire) (parts I and III). The Fibromyalgia Survey Questionnaire will be used in the Spanish version. This questionnaire assesses the severity of fibromyalgia symptoms. The first part of this questionnaire is constituted by 3 questions related to the last week, and they have to be answered by likert scales of 3 points. Higher scores indicate higher disability. The third part of this questionnaire is constituted by a qualitative localization of pain in the last week. A higher number of body regions suffering pain constitute a worse outcome. Parts II and IV of the questionnaire will not be considered as an outcome measure since they evaluate periods of 6 months and 3 months respectively, and our post-intervention measurement will be performed just 7 days after intervention, so these parts of the questionnaire have no interest as outcome measures.
Revised Fibromyalgia Impact QuestionnairePre-intervention. Post-intervention: 7 days.Revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (Questionnaire). This questionnaire evaluates the difficulty to develop certain daily-life activities. It will be used in the Spanish version. This questionnaire assesses the severity of fibromyalgia symptoms. Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating higher disability.

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026