Double Raw Repair, Full Rotator Cuff Tear, Microfracture Procedure
Conditions
Brief summary
This study is a prospective randomized controlled study of Combined microfracture procedure promotes tendon healing during double raw repair for full tear rotator cuff. The patients with rotator cuff tear were randomly divided into groups before the operation. The patients were followed up before and 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months after surgery. In different time periods, the quantitative and qualitative indicators including pain, functional score, muscle strength, MRI performance, etc. were compared between groups at the same time period to evaluate the difference in the effect of Crimson duvet procedure with Greenhouse procedure on the treatment of rotator cuff.
Interventions
PROCEDUREmicrofracture procedure
double raw repair combined with microfracture procedure which promotes tendon healing by releasing growth factors
PROCEDUREonly double raw repair
the double raw repair was used to repair the tendon tear
Sponsors
Beijing Jishuitan Hospital
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Arthroscopy confirmed small to medium full rotator cuff tear * Unilateral rotator cuff injury * Voluntarily accept randomized controlled grouping, cooperate with treatment and follow up patients * Young and middle-aged patients aged 20 to 60
Exclusion criteria
* Previous shoulder surgery (incision or arthroscopy) * Combined with diseases of other parts of the same limb * Combined with Bankart injury, acromioclavicular joint disease, greater tuberosity fracture, glenoid fracture and so on * Bilateral onset * Unable or unwilling to receive clinical follow-up
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| rotator cuff re-tear rate | 2 year postoperatively | the rotator cuff re-tear rate was measured by MRI, MRI was performed to identify the status of the tendon |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ASES（American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons'Form） | 3,6,12,24 months postoperatively | A score used to evaluate the shoulder function, higher scores mean a better outcome. |
| Constant score | 3,6,12,24 months postoperatively | A score used to evaluate the shoulder function, higher scores mean a better outcome. |
| VAS (Visual Analogue Scale) | 1,2,3,7 days postoperatively and 3,6,12,24 months postoperatively, higher scores mean a worse outcome. | A score used to evaluate the pain |
| SST (simple shoulder test) | 3,6,12,24 months postoperatively | A score used to evaluate the shoulder function, higher scores mean a better outcome. |
| front extension, external rotation and internal rotation strength of shoulder | 6,12,24 months postoperatively | Use a dynamometer to measure in N |
| UCLA (University LosAngeles scoring system) | 3,6,12,24 months postoperatively | A score used to evaluate the shoulder function, higher scores mean a better outcome. |
Countries
China
Contacts
Primary ContactShangzhe Li, M.D.
Outcome results
None listed