Skip to content

Efficacy of Hyaluronic Acid Gel and Photobiomodulation on Wound Healing After Surgical Gingivectomy

Efficacy of Hyaluronic Acid Gel and Photobiomodulation on Wound Healing After Surgical Gingivectomy: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05787912
Enrollment
26
Registered
2023-03-28
Start date
2022-02-01
Completion date
2023-02-10
Last updated
2023-03-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Enlargement

Keywords

Surgical gingivectomy, Hyaluronic acid, Photobiomodulation

Brief summary

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of hyaluronic acid gel after photobiomodulation on the healing of surgical gingivectomy sites

Interventions

DEVICEPhotobiomodulation

The surgical sites were irradiated with a diode laser (980 nm, 0.2W) only.

OTHERHyaluronic acid after photobiomodulation

The surgical sites after gingivectomy were irradiated with a diode laser (980 nm, 0.2W) then covered by 2% Hyaluronic acid gel loaded in a special appliance for each patient.

Sponsors

Alexandria University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic inflammatory gingival enlargement grade 2 and 3 according to the gingival overgrowth index by Miller and Damn. * Adequate amount of keratinized tissue. * Attachment loss= 0 * Well educated patients as post-operative instructions need to be followed precisely.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with history of smoking * Pregnant women * Patients with bad oral hygiene * Patients who have any known systemic disease that interfere with performance of surgical gingivectomy or periodontal wound healing * Patients who have any previous adverse reactions to the products (or similar products) used in this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Wound healingup to 21 daysAssessed using Landry's healing index which grades the wound on a scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) * Very poor (1): ≥50% of gingiva red, bleeding on palpation, Granulation tissue present, Non-epithelialized incision margin with loss of epithelium beyond the margin. * Poor (2): ≥50% of gingiva red, bleeding on palpation, Granulation tissue present, Non-epithelialized incision margin with exposed connective tissue * Good (3): ≥25% and\<50% of gingiva red, No bleeding on palpation, no granulation tissue, No exposed connective tissue on the incision margin * Very good (4): \<25% of gingiva red, No bleeding on palpation, no granulation tissue, No exposed connective tissue on the incision margin * Excellent (5): All tissues are pink, No bleeding on palpation, no granulation tissue, No exposed connective tissue on the incision margin
Perceived painup to 21 daysThis was assessed using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients were instructed to chart their perceptions of pain using VAS ranging from 0-10; where 0 represents no pain/burning sensation and 10 represents severe pain/burning sensation.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026