Skip to content

Vagal Nerve Stimulation as Therapeutic Approach on Metabolic Syndrome

Effect of Non-invasive Auricular Vagal Nerve Stimulation Versus Circuit Weight Training on Nutritional Modulation in Patient With Metabolic Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05785117
Enrollment
70
Registered
2023-03-27
Start date
2023-03-01
Completion date
2023-05-30
Last updated
2024-08-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metabolic Syndrome

Brief summary

Participants were randomly assigned to two groups prior to their second visit: the Vagus nerve stimulation group (VNS) and the circuit training program. The randomization processes were conducted in Excel utilizing a random-number generator. Prior to the second visit, each participants' target exercise heart rate ranges were determined. Vagus nerve stimulation group(VNS) Patients rested on their sides in a sitting position. Following regular disinfection of the stimulation locations, ear clips were placed in the ear region (auricular concha) at the stimulation site. The training regimen included ten different forms of resistance and aerobic exercises.

Detailed description

Vagus nerve stimulation group Group: 1. Each participant signed a consent form after receiving a detailed explanation about the procedure. 2. Patients rested on their sides in a sitting position. 3. Disinfection of the stimulation locations. 4. Ear clips were placed in the ear region (auricular concha) at the stimulation site. 5. Emotional eating was assessed by Emotional Eating Scale. 5. Patient satisfaction was assessed by The Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS). 6. Cortisol was assessed in lab. 7. After one month all the assessment procedure will be repeated again. Circuit training group Group: 1. Each participant will signed a consent form after receiving a detailed explanation about the procedure. 2. The training regimen included ten different forms of resistance and aerobic exercises. 3. Emotional eating was assessed by Emotional Eating Scale. 4. Patient satisfaction was assessed by The Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS). 5 Cortisol was assessed in lab. 6. After one month all the assessment procedure will be repeated again.

Interventions

ear clips were placed in the ear region (auricular concha) at the stimulation site. The following stimulation settings were used: 1) density wave set to 20 Hz with a wave width of less than 1 ms; 2) intensity tuned to the patient's tolerance (4-6 mA)

The training regimen included ten different forms of resistance and aerobic exercise that were done three times a week for four weeks. The resistance training program included push-ups, squats, crunches, lunges, and a superman exercise program that included light jumping, jogging on the spot, foot stomping, steps, and jumping jacks

Sponsors

Rana Elbanna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
45 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

having two or more than one of the following: * Type 2 diabetes Miletus * Hypertensive. * Abnormal Cholesterol or Triglyceride level. * BMI more than 30 kg/m * Waist circumference more than 94 cm.

Exclusion criteria

* Vagotomy. * Diathermy. * Wallowing difficulties. * Dyspnea. * Cardiac arrhythmia. * Seizure. * Previous brain injury or surgery. * Dysautonomia.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Emotional eating4 weeksEmotional Eating was measured by a 15-item version of the Emotional Eating Scale. The scale required responses from 0 (no desire to eat) to 4 (an overwhelming urge to eat) based on … the extent which the following feelings presently lead you to feel an urge to eat. A lower score indicated less of an urge to eat when the designated emotional state was present.
Patient satisfaction measures4 weeksThe Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) is a seven-item scale that can be utilized to measure patient satisfaction with their treatment. The seven-item Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS), which is scored on a 5-point scale (0-4) SAPS has a continuous score range of 0 to 28. SAPS categorical responses include 0-10 very dissatisfied, 11-18 dissatisfied, 19-26 satisfied, and 27-28 very satisfied.
Cortisol level4 weeksParticipants use a disposable plastic straw to 'drool' saliva into the tube after collecting it in their mouths for a predetermined period of time (one minute) Saliva samples for cortisol measurement kept at room temperature until they are examined in a lab (4 to 6 hours)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Body weight4 weeksAfter an eight-hour fast, body weight was taken between 7:00 and 10:00 am using a digital scale that was accurate to ±0.1 kg

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026