Alzheimer Disease, Mild Dementia
Conditions
Brief summary
Neurocognitive disorders have a growing prevalence and impact on public health; their main etiology corresponds to Alzheimer's disease. To date, there is no treatment that can reverse neuronal damage in these pathologies. However, several non-invasive neuromodulation techniques, including transcranial magnetic stimulation, have been proposed as a viable option to halt the progression of the disease. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive, nonpainful neurostimulation technique with a high safety profile that has been successfully used to improve cognitive function in subjects with mild cognitive impairment. Our research group conducted a study that showed that the use of low-intensity TMS at gamma frequencies is a safe, non-invasive method with minimal adverse effects. The present protocol proposes a new randomized, double-blind, crossover trial to be conducted in memory clinic patients over 65 years of age who meet the diagnosis of mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease. The main objective is to evaluate the short-term cognitive and electroencephalographic changes produced by low-intensity, gamma-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation. A TMS device that emits a pulsed magnetic field at a frequency of 40 Hz, with a maximum magnitude of 150 gauss for 45 minutes will be used as an intervention. The intervention will be of two types, real or simulated, and will be applied twice to each patient, that is, in one session they will receive the real stimulation and in another the simulated one. In addition, during the sessions, cognitive and electroencephalographic measurements will be taken before, during and after each intervention. Each of these stimulation sessions should be separated by at least one week.
Interventions
DEVICElow-intensity rTMS
40 hz, 150 gauss, 1 session that lasts 45 minutes.
Sponsors
Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes
Inclusion criteria
* Both sexes * Age over 65 years old * Who give written informed consent * Patients with a diagnosis compatible with mild dementia according to NINCDS-ADRDA (National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke-Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association, 1984) criteria. * CDR 1 * Preserved or corrected ability to see and hear * Have a formal or informal caregiver
Exclusion criteria
* Clinical diagnosis of a neurodegenerative disease other than mild dementia due to Alzheimer's disease * Present an uncontrolled medical condition at the time of the assessment for admission to the protocol (diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, hypothyroidism, uncontrolled renal or hepatic insufficiency). * Diagnosis of major depression and/or some other untreated psychiatric illness (calculated with GDS) * Excessive alcohol use * Current or recent (6 months) use of any neurostimulation methods * Metal implants excluding dental * Signs or symptoms of increased intracranial pressure * History of having received electroconvulsive therapy. * Suffering from epilepsy. * Having a deep brain stimulator implanted. * Having any metallic prosthesis in the head. * Having a pacemaker * Extensive tattoos * Taking any of the following medications: * Tricyclic antidepressants such as: imipramine, amitriptyline, doxepin, nostriptyline, matroptyline. * Antivirals such as: foscarnet, ganciclovir, ritonavir, dissociative anesthetics such as: phencyclidine, ketamine, γ-hydroxybutyrate * Other stimulant drugs such as: amphetamines, cocaine, MDMA (ecstasy)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Changes in EEG gamma band activity | Baseline (1 second before stimulation burst) - Post (1 second after stimulation burst) |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in Face-Name Associative Memory Test scores | Baseline (the last 10 minutes of the intervention) - Post (one week later, the last 10 minutes of the intervention) | The Face-Name Associative Memory Test is a cross-modal associative memory test, it includes 20 face-name pairs. The administration procedure starts with the presentation of 20 faces with each name and participants should read the name underneath the faces and try to learn each face-name pair. After 5 minutes, the faces are shown one by one and participants are asked to recall the associated names from 4 different names. The correct number of pairs recalled is recorded. |
| Change from baseline in phonological and semantic verbal fluency test | Baseline (immediately before the intervention) - Post (Immediately after the intervention: 60 minutes approximately) | The participant must say the largest number of words of a semantic category for one minute and then the largest number of words beginning with a given phoneme, also for one minute. Two versions of these tests are applied, one during baseline and one after stimulation. The order of application of the versions changes in the first and second sessions. That is, if in the first session they started with version 1 in the baseline and version 2 in the post, then in the second session they will start with version 2 and then version 1. There is a one week difference between the first and second session. The results obtained in the stimulation session and the sham session will be compared. |
| Changes in Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test scores | Baseline (immediately before the intervention) - Post (Immediately after the intervention: 60 minutes approximately)) | Participants are given a list of 15 unrelated words repeated over five different trials and are asked to repeat. Another list of 15 unrelated words are given and the patient must again repeat the original list of 15 words and then again after 20 minutes. The score ranges from 0 (worse performance) to 15 (best performance). Two versions of this test are applied, one during baseline and one after stimulation. The order of application of the versions changes in the first and second sessions. That is, if in the first session one started with version 1 at baseline and version 2 at post, in the second session one will start with version 2 and then version 1. There is a one week difference between the first and second session. The results obtained in the stimulation session and the sham session will be compared. |
Countries
Mexico
Outcome results
None listed