Pancreatic Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
Owing to that the previous study of the investigators showed that SBRT plus pembrolizumab and trametinib provided favorable outcomes compared with SBRT plus gemcitabine for pancreatic cancer, therefore, the investigators aim to further investigate the efficacy and safety of SBRT plus another kind of immunotherapy, namely adoptive cell therapy (vNKT cell), for advanced pancreatic cancer.
Detailed description
Pancreatic cancer still remains one of the most lethal malignancies and fourth leading cancer cause of death in US, with a slight increasing incidence and the lowest 5-year survival rate of 9%. Although surgical resection is considered as the radical treatment, most patients were not amenable to surgery due to the initial diagnosis of advanced pancreatic cancer. For those patients, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), recommended as the local treatment, combining with chemotherapy is the optimal treatment. Despite improved knowledge about the genetic background and an increasing understanding of the tumor microenvironment, immunotherapy especially immune checkpoint inhibitors, although efficient for many solid malignancies, including metastatic melanoma and lung cancer, have not yielded any clinical benefit in pancreatic cancer. In addition to immune checkpoint inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) has shown promising efficacy in hematologic malignancies. Nowadays, adoptive cell therapy includes CD8+ T cells and NK cells modified with chimeric antigen receptors. However, due to limited technology, expansion of specific CD8+ T cells is quite difficult. Additionally, there is lack of specific tumor antigens in solid tumors, which results in unsatisfactory outcomes of CAR-T and CAR-NK cells targeting solid tumors. Therefore, novel cell therapies may provide insights into therapies for solid tumors. Recently, vNKT and γδT cells used in trials of cell therapy have aroused attention. NKT cells possess both phenotypes of T cells and NK cells. Hence, NKT cells could secret various cytokines and chemokines after stimulations to enhance anti-tumor immunity independent of MHC. Also, cytotoxic effects of NKT cells could be activated via T cell receptors (TCR) targeting specific antigens. There are two kinds of NKT cells. One is classic NKT cells with invariant TCR which are specialized CD1d-restricted T cells that recognize lipid antigens, called iNKT (invariant NKT) cells. The other is non-CD1d-restrcited. This CD8+ NKT cells has more potent anti-tumor effects than conventional T and NK cells, which is manifested by killing tumor cells and myeloid derived suppressor cells. Owing to recognition of MHC-restricted antigens via diverse TCRs, they are called vNKT (variant NKT) cells. Furthermore, our previous studies has clarified favorable outcomes from the synergy of SBRT plus immunotherapy for pancreatic cancer. Therefore, the investigators aim to investigate the efficacy and safety of SBRT plus vNKT cell adoptive therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.
Interventions
DRUGStereotactic body radiation therapy
Details have been shown in arm descriptions.
DRUGadoptive cell therapy with vNKT cells
Details have been shown in arm descriptions.
Sponsors
Changhai Hospital
Study design
Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
1. Age more than 18 years. 2. Pathological confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. 3. No previous immunotherapy or radiotherapy, or more than one year after the last course of radiotherapy. 4. History of sugery or chemotherapy, and documented disease progressions after these therapies. 5. ECOG performance status of 0-2 points. 6. Normal results of laboratory tests, including WBC ≥4.0×10\^9/L, Neu ≥2.0×10\^9/L, Hb ≥120g/L, Plt ≥100×10\^9/L; AST, ALT \<2.5 times of the upper limit of normal, total bilirubin \<17.1μmol/L, creatinine \<110μmoI/L; international normalized ratio in coagulation test \<2.0 7. Willing to participate in the study and complete follow-up examinations as required.
Exclusion criteria
1. History of immunotherapy, or less than one year after the last course of radiotherapy. 2. History of other tumors. 3. Confirmed synchronous multiple tumors. 4. ECOG performance status of more than 2 points. 5. Active inflammatory bowel disease, or peptic ulcer. 6. History of gastrointestinal bleeding or perforation within 6 months. 7. Infections required antibiotics. 8. Positive HBsAg or HCV antibody. 9. Positive HIV antibody. 10. Impaired heart function (NYHA III-IV level), respiratory insufficiency. 11. Confirmed genetic diseases. 12. History of hematologic diseases, including leukemia, lymphoma, myeloma or myelodysplastic syndrome. 13. History of stem cell or organ transplantation. 14. History of autoimmune diseases except leukoderma punctata. 15. Severe anaphylaxis. 16. Long term use of immunosuppressors or steroids. 17. Receiving chemotherapy at the time of screening stage, or participation of other studies. 18. Pregnancy or lactation. 19. Unable to understand the whole procedure of study and provide written informed consent. 20. No comprehensive understanding about patients' immune functions.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall survival will be determined | From randomization to death irrespective of cause, assessed up to 2 years | From randomization to death irrespective of cause |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Progression free survival will be determined | From randomization to documentation of any clinical or radiological disease progression or death, whichever occurred first, assessed up to 2 years | From randomization to documentation of any clinical or radiological disease progression or death, whichever occurred first |
| Adverse effects will be determined | Up to 2 years | Assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE; version 4.0) |
| Quality of life will be determined | Up to 2 years | Assessed with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30. The score of each scale ranges from 0 to 100. Higher scores in function domains and global health status indicate better quality of life, while higher scores in symptom domains imply worse quality of life. |
Countries
China
Outcome results
None listed