Skip to content

Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (CBI)

Clinical Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Cognitive Behavioral Intervention (CBI) Adjunctive to a Smart Powered Toothbrush on the Oral Health of Adolescents

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05782348
Enrollment
150
Registered
2023-03-23
Start date
2023-08-06
Completion date
2025-02-28
Last updated
2025-04-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adolescent Behavior, Dental Plaque, Gingivitis, Cognitive Change

Keywords

adolescent health, dental plaque, gingivitis, cognitive change

Brief summary

This is a Phase III, randomized, one-center, three arm parallel group, open label and single blind clinical study to evaluate the effectiveness of a cognitive behavioral intervention (CBI) adjunctive to a smart powered toothbrush on the oral health of adolescents.

Detailed description

This is a Phase III, randomized, one-center, three arm parallel group, open label and single blind clinical study to evaluate the effectiveness of a cognitive behavioral intervention (CBI) adjunctive to a smart powered toothbrush on the oral health of adolescents. Outcomes briefly summarized include the plaque score, gingival score and a survey of knowledge, attitudes and procedures measured at 1,3 and 6 months Participating subjects will be randomized to one of the following products: TEST GROUP I A commercially available fluoride toothpaste (1450 ppm F) A commercially available Smart Electric toothbrush CONTROL GROUP I A commercially available fluoride toothpaste (1450 ppm F) A commercially available Smart Electric toothbrush CONTROL GROUP II A commercially available fluoride toothpaste (1450 ppm F) A commercially available soft bristle toothbrush

Interventions

A six-session CBI Intervention component will be used with the TEST GROUP I. This will examine a cognitive behavioral intervention designed to improve tooth brushing and oral hygiene. The components include oral health education, values-based activities, motivational interviewing, goal setting, problem solving skills, cognitive restructuring, verbal reinforcement and stress management.

OTHERColgate smart toothbrush

A Colgate smart toothbrush that provides the user with details on toothbrushing habits and frequency

Sponsors

Temple University
CollaboratorOTHER
Howard University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Three arm parallel group single blind study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Students are enrolled in participating high schools Caregivers give informed consent Student gives assent

Exclusion criteria

* Having a prosthetic heart valve * Having a history of previously having infective endocarditis * Having had joint replacement surgery * Children on blood thinner medication such as Coumadin or Rivaroxaban * Children who are currently receiving chemotherapy * Children who have received organ transplants of any type * Children with Leukemia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Gingival inflammationAll outcomes will be measured at baseline, at1 month, 3 months and at 6 monthsA Löe-Silness Gingival Index score from 0 to 3 will be assigned by the examining dentist to all scorable surfaces of the maxillary and mandibular teeth using a dental light and dental mirror. A whole mouth mean score for each subject will be determined by adding the values given by the examining dentist to each scorable surface and dividing that number by the total number of surfaces scored. Scores Criteria 0 Absence of inflammation 1. Mild inflammation- Slight change in color and mild edema with little change in texture. No bleeding on probing. 2. Moderate inflammation- moderate glazing, redness, edema and hypertrophy. Bleeding on probing. 3. Severe inflammation- Marked redness, hypertrophy, edema and ulceration. Tendency for spontaneous bleeding.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plaque scoresAll outcomes will be measured at baseline, 1 month, 3 months and at 6 monthsMean plaque index scores will be computed for each subject. Each tooth is scored in six areas: 1) mesio-facial; 2) mid-facial; 3) disto-facial; 4) mesio-lingual; 5) mid-lingual; and 6) disto-lingual. Whole mouth within subject mean scores will be computed as follows: Total plaque score for all scoring sites divided by total number of scoring sites
Knowledge assessmentAll outcomes will be measured at baseline, 1 month, 3 months and at 6 monthsKnowledge will be assessed using 19 item scale previously used by the researchers Enrolled subjects will complete a questionnaire on oral health knowledge, attitudes, and practices including: frequency of brushing and flossing, knowledge, oral health values scale, self-efficacy and motivation. The outcome will be assessed using a 19-item multiple choice survey previously used in Colgate-sponsored research protocols. A six-item oral health self-efficacy scale will be used to measure participant self-reported confidence in their ability to carry out an oral health care routine. Lastly, motivation to engage in recommended oral hygiene behavior will be assessed with a single item 1analog scale (i.e., How important is it to follow guidelines for brushing twice per day and flossing once per day, from 0 not important at all to 10 most important.)
Efficacy assessmentAll outcomes will be measured at baseline, 1 month, 3months and at 6 monthsEfficacy will be assessed using a validated 6 item oral health self-efficacy scale
Motivation assessmentAll outcomes will be measured at baseline, 1 month, 3months and at 6 monthsMotivation will be assessed using a single item 10-point visual analog scale

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026