Skip to content

Normal Saline Versus Lactated Ringer's Solution for Acute Pancreatitis Resuscitation

Normal Saline Versus Lactated Ringer's Solution for Acute Pancreatitis Resuscitation, an Open-label Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: the WATERLAND Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05781243
Acronym
WATERLAND
Enrollment
792
Registered
2023-03-23
Start date
2023-06-19
Completion date
2024-09-30
Last updated
2025-01-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Pancreatitis

Keywords

Normal saline, Lactated Ringer solution, Acute pancreatitis, Fluid Therapy, Fluid resuscitation

Brief summary

Background: Some evidence suggests that fluid resuscitation with lactated Ringer's solution (LR) may have an anti-inflammatory effect on acute pancreatitis (AP) when compared to normal saline (NS), and may be associated with a decrease in severity, but existing single center randomized controlled trials showed conflicting results. The WATERLAND trial aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of fluid resuscitation using LR compared to NS in patients with AP. Methods: The WATERLAND trial is an international multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized, controlled, superiority trial. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive LR versus NS-based fluid resuscitation for at least 48 hours. The primary outcome will be moderately severe or severe AP, according to the revision of the Atlanta classification. The secondary objectives of the WATERLAND trial are to determine the effect of LR versus NS fluid resuscitation on several efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with AP. A total sample of 720 patients, 360 in the LR group and 360 in the NS group, will achieve 90% power to detect a difference between the group proportions of 10%, assuming that the frequency of moderately severe or severe AP in the LR group will be 17%. A loss to follow-up of 10% of patients is expected, so the total sample size will be 396 patients in each treatment arm (792 patients overall). The test statistic used is the two-sided Z test with pooled variance set at a 0.05 significance level. Discussion: The WATERLAND study aims to improve the early management of AP. Fluid resuscitation is an inexpensive treatment available in any hospital center worldwide. If a better evolution of pancreatitis is demonstrated in one of the treatment arms, it would have important repercussions in the management of this frequent disease.

Detailed description

The entire protocol is published in open-access format, including the Statistical Analysis plan, in the journal Trials: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08539-2

Interventions

Patients in the LR (Lactated Ringer solution) treatment arm will receive fluid therapy based on lactated Ringer's solution for a minimum of 48 hours.

DRUGNormal saline

Patients in the NS (Normal Saline) treatment arm will receive fluid therapy based on lactated Ringer's solution for a minimum of 48 hours.

Sponsors

Instituto de Salud Carlos III
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital del Mar
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiago
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Costa del Sol
CollaboratorOTHER
Corporacion Parc Tauli
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitario La Fe
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Miguel Servet
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitario Insular Gran Canaria
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Virgen de las Nieves
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitario de Burgos
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar
CollaboratorOTHER
Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Universitario de la Princesa
CollaboratorOTHER
Dr. Negrin University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad del Bajio
CollaboratorOTHER
Asian Institute Of Medical Sciences
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Dr. Jaime Mendoza Sucre Bolivia
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hayatabad Medical Complex
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University Hospital Olomouc
CollaboratorOTHER
SIDS Hospital & Research Centre Gujarat India
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Sanatorio Allende
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Bratislava
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital Sestre Milosrdnice
CollaboratorOTHER
Attikon Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Nuevo Hospital Iturraspe Santa Fe Argentina
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital Nacional Rosales
CollaboratorOTHER
Zagazig University
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
University of Utah
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital of Girona Dr. Josep Trueta
CollaboratorNETWORK
Hospital of Navarra
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
CollaboratorOTHER
Kalinga Hospital, Bhubaneswar
CollaboratorOTHER
Ohio State University
CollaboratorOTHER
Zhengzhou University
CollaboratorOTHER
Jinling Hospital, China
CollaboratorOTHER
Hospital Privado de Cordoba, Argentina
CollaboratorOTHER
Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong
CollaboratorOTHER
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research in Chandigarh
CollaboratorOTHER
RML Specialty Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Wannan Medical College Yijishan Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Bucharest Emergency Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology
CollaboratorOTHER
Emergency County Hospital Pius Brinzeu; Timisoara, Romania
CollaboratorNETWORK
King Hamad University Hospital, Bahrain
CollaboratorOTHER
Enrique de-Madaria
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient is 18 years or older * Diagnosis of acute pancreatitis according to the revision of the Atlanta classification (Banks et al, Gut 2013), which requires at least two of the following three criteria: A) typical abdominal pain, B) increase in serum amylase or lipase levels higher than three times the upper limit of normality, and C) signs of acute pancreatitis in imaging * Signature of informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* New York Heart Association class II heart failure (slight limitation of physical activity; fatigue, palpitations, or dyspnea with ordinal physical activity) or worse, or ejection fraction \<50% in the last echocardiography * Decompensated cirrhosis (Child's class B or C) * Hyper or hyponatremia (\<135 or \>145 mEq/L) * Hyperkalemia (\>5 mEq/L) * Hypercalcemia (albumin or protein-corrected calcium \>10.5 mg/dL or 2.62 mmol/L) * Criteria for moderately severe or severe acute pancreatitis (revision of the Atlanta classification, Banks et al, Gut 2013) at recruitment: any of the following: A) presence of creatinine ≥1.9 mg/dL or ≥170 mmol/l, B) PaO2/FiO2≤300, C) systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg despite initial fluid resuscitation, D) presence of local complications (acute peripancreatic fluid collections, acute necrotic collection, pseudocyst, walled-off necrosis, gastric outlet dysfunction, splenic or portal vein thrombosis, or colonic necrosis), E) exacerbation of previous comorbidity such as coronary artery disease or chronic lung disease, precipitated by the acute pancreatitis * Signs of volume overload or heart failure at recruitment (peripheral edema, pulmonary rales, or increased jugular ingurgitation at 45º) * Time from pain onset to arrival to emergency room \>24 h * Time from confirmation of pancreatitis to randomization \>8 h * Chronic pancreatitis defined by a Wirsung duct ≥4mm and/or pancreatic calcifications * More than 1 previous episode of acute pancreatitis (only 2 episodes of acute pancreatitis are allowed, one of them the present episode)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants with moderately severe or severe acute pancreatitisFrom date of randomization until 30 days after randomizationPresence of local complications, exacerbation of previous comorbidity or organ failure, according to the definitions of these complications provided by the revised Atlanta Classification (https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of participants with necrotizing pancreatitisFrom date of randomization until 30 days after randomizationPresence of acute necrotic collections according to the revised Atlanta Classification (https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779).
Number of participants with infection of pancreatic collections or necrosisFrom date of randomization until 30 days after randomizationExtraluminal gas in the pancreatic and/or peripancreatic tissues on CT scan or when a sample from the collection/necrosis contains pus or is positive for bacteria and/or fungi on Gram stain or culture.
Number of participants with systemic inflammatory response syndromeAt 24 and 48 hoursAt least 2 criteria: A) pulse \>90 beats/min, B) respirations \>20/min or arterial blood PaCO2 \<32 mm Hg, C) temperature \<36°C or \>38°C, D) white blood cell count \<4,000 cells/mm3 or \>12,000 cells/mm3 or \>10% bands
Number of systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteriaAt 24 and 48 hoursThe criteria are: A) pulse \>90 beats/min, B) respirations \>20/min or arterial blood PaCO2 \<32 mm Hg, C) temperature \<36°C or \>38°C, D) white blood cell count \<4,000 cells/mm3 or \>12,000 cells/mm3 or \>10% bands
PAN-PROMISE symptom scaleAt 24 and 48 hours (final value and change from baseline)PAN-PROMISE scale: a 7-symptom scale patient-reported outcome (range, 0 to 10 for each symptom; overall range, 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating higher symptom intensity). Details: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320729
Time to oral refeedingFrom date of randomization until 30 days after randomizationDays from baseline to oral refeeding
Number of participants with invasive treatmentFrom date of randomization until 30 days after randomizationAny of the following: thoracocentesis due to pancreatitis-induced pleural effusion, percutaneous and/or endoscopic drainage of pancreatic or peripancreatic fluid collections or necrosis, endoscopic or surgical necrosectomy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography due to A) ruptured common bile duct, B) jaundice caused by compression of the common bile duct, C) main pancreatic duct leakage
Number of participants with nutritional supportFrom date of randomization until 30 days after randomizationUse of enteral (nasogastric or nasojejunal) or parenteral feeding
Number of participants with hyperchloremic acidosisAt 24 and 48 hours from randomizationPatients with venous chloride\>106mEq/L and venous blood pH \<7.35
Number of participants with intensive care unit admissionFrom date of randomization until 30 days after randomizationAdmission in the intensive care unit
Number of participants with exacerbation of coexisting conditionFrom date of randomization until 30 days after randomizationExacerbation of pre-existing co-morbidity. The definition provided by the Revised Atlanta Classification is Exacerbation of pre-existing co-morbidity, such as coronary artery disease or chronic lung disease, precipitated by the acute pancreatitis is defined as a systemic complication. In this document, we distinguish between persistent organ failure (the defining feature of severe acute pancreatitis) and other systemic complications, which are an exacerbation of pre-existing co-morbid disease. (revised Atlanta classification: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779) For the WATERLAND trial we define exacerbation of pre-existing co-morbidity as
Number of participants with any organ failureFrom date of randomization until 30 days after randomizationDefinition according to the revised Atlanta classification (https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779): organ failure is defined by the presence of any of the following criteria: A) kidney failure as a creatinine ≥1.9 mg/dL or \>170 micromol/L, B) cardiovascular failure as a systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg despite fluid resuscitation, and C) respiratory failure as a PaO2/FIO2≤300
Number of participants with persistent organ failureFrom date of randomization until 30 days after randomizationOrgan failure lasting more than 48h (revised Atlanta classification: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779)
Number of participants with local complicationsFrom date of randomization until 30 days after randomizationPresence of acute peripancreatic fluid collections, acute necrotic collection, pseudocyst, walled-off necrosis, gastric outlet dysfunction, splenic or portal vein thrombosis, and colonic necrosis according to the revised Atlanta Classification (https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779).
Number of participants with respiratory failureFrom date of randomization until 30 days after randomizationPaO2/FIO2≤300 (revised Atlanta classification: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779)
Number of participants with kidney failureFrom date of randomization until 30 days after randomizationCreatinine ≥1.9 mg/dL or \>170 micromol/L (revised Atlanta classification: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779)
Mortality (number of participants)From date of randomization until 30 days after randomizationDeath
Number of participants with composite safety outcome (primary safety outcome)At 24 and 48 hours from randomizationFluid overload or acute kidney injury or hyperkalemia or hypercalcemia or hyperchloremia or acidosis
Hospital stayFrom date of randomization until 30 days after randomizationDays from recruitment to discharge from index admission
C-reactive proteinAt 48 hours from randomizationC-reactive protein blood levels
Number of participants with hypovolemiaAt 24 and 48 hours from randomizationWATERFALL trial criteria for hypovolemia (see https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2202884)
Number of participants with fluid overloadFrom randomization to 72 h thereafterWATERFALL trial criteria for fluid overload (see https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2202884)
Number of participants with acute kidney injuryAt 24 and 48 hours from randomizationKDIGO criteria: increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 hr or ≥50% within 7 days or urine output of \<0.5 mL/kg/hr for \>6 hr (https://doi.org/10.1159/000339789)
Number of participants with hyperkalemiaAt 24 and 48 hours from randomizationVenous potassium\>5mEq/L
Number of participants with hypercalcemiaAt 24 and 48 hours from randomizationVenous calcium corrected by proteins\>10.5mg/dL or 2.62 mmol/L
Number of participants with hyperchloremiaAt 24 and 48 hours from randomizationVenous chloride\>106mEq/L
Number of participants with acidosisAt 24 and 48 hours from randomizationVenous blood pH \<7.35
Number of participants with shockFrom date of randomization until 30 days after randomizationSystolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg despite fluid resuscitation (revised Atlanta classification: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779)

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 5, 2026