Skip to content

Efficacy of Anterior Wall PVI With QDOT Catheter - Intraprocedural Comparison Between vHPSD and HPSD Ablation.

Optimization of PVI Strategy Using QDOT Catheter. What is the Proper Energy Level for Anterior Wall of Pulmonary Veins- Intraprocedural Efficacy Comparison Between HSPD and vHPSD (The A-Q-RATE POWER Trial)

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05780996
Acronym
A-Q-RATE-POWER
Enrollment
70
Registered
2023-03-23
Start date
2023-02-01
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2023-03-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

atrial fibrillation, QDOT, very high power short-duration, pulmonary vein isolation, left atrial wall thickness, catheter ablation

Brief summary

This study is a prospective, randomized controlled study to evaluate intraprocedural efficacy of anterior aspects of pulmonary veins insolation between very High Power Short Duration (vHPSD) and High Power Short Duration (HPSD) in patient with paroxysmal or persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

Detailed description

This study is a dual-center, prospective, randomized controlled study to evaluate intraprocedural efficacy of anterior aspects of pulmonary veins isolation between very High Power Short Duration (vHPSD) and High Power Short Duration (HPSD) in patient with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with circumferential pulmonary vein isolation is an well-established method of treatment, particularly in symptomatic patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who are ineffective or refractory to pharmacological treatment. Recurrence of pulmonary veins conduction is considered as a risk factor for future recurrence of AF. This may be partly related to the incomplete scar formation during the index ablation procedure. Constant technological progress (i.e. ablation catheters with contact force) has led to greater efficiency in obtaining complete isolation of pulmonary veins, achieving nearly 90% success rate in 12-month follow-up paroxysmal AF (CLOSE protocol). The duration of the RF application depends on the ablation index (AI), which proves that the energy has been effectively delivered to the myocardium. Currently, AI values are considered representative of RF power up to 50W. When energy above 50 W was used, the scar size was shown to be smaller than when the same AI value was used but with higher power. The safety and efficacy of novel ablation catheter QDOT (Biosense Webster, Irvine, CA, USA), that allows to deliver very high and high-power short-duration ablation, was already proven in clinical trials (QDOT FAST, Q-FFICIENCY). The benefits from using very high power short-duration ablation include: 1) shortening the duration of the procedure, 2) reducing the volume of fluids administered through the ablation electrode during RF application, which may be important in patients with heart and kidney failure, 3) reducing the frequency of collateral damages to surrounding structures of the heart (e.g. oesophagus). One of the differences related to the biophysics of RF applications between high and low energy is the range of penetration into the muscle tissue, which could impact on effectiveness of ablation. It was shown that lesions performed with vHPSD were smaller (up to 2,9 mm deep) compared to HPSD or conventional power with target AI. It is attractive for posterior wall of left atrium and can reduce peri-procedural complications. However vHPSD could be insufficient in some regions of anterior wall of the left atrium, which thickness may vary from 1 to 4 mm. Our research hypothesis is that integrated approach with different energies depending on the left atrium location is safe and lead to better efficacy than use of only vHPSD ablation in terms of first pass isolation.

Interventions

DEVICEQMODE +

Atrial fibrillation radiofrequency ablation of the anterior and posterior wall with 90W (vHPSD)

DEVICEQMODE

Atrial fibrillation radiofrequency ablation of the anterior wall with 50W (HPSD). Ablation of the posterior wall with 90 W (vHPSD)

Sponsors

Medical University of Warsaw
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patient scheduled for their first AF ablation procedure 2. Written informed consent 3. Paroxysmal or persistent AF 4. Age \> 18

Exclusion criteria

1. previous ablation procedure with pulmonary vein isolation 2. lack of written informed consent 3. pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute procedural successDuring ablation.First pass isolation of anterior wall of pulmonary veins.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
percentage of pulmonary vein pairs isolated with first encirclementduring ablationpercentage of pulmonary vein pairs isolated with first encirclement
Total procedure durationduring ablationskin to skin procedure duration
Number of additional RF application needed to obtain pulmonary vein isolationduring ablationNumber of additional RF application needed to obtain pulmonary vein isolation
Fluoroscopy timeduring ablationfluoroscopy time
Change of heart rhythm after right pulmonary veins isolationduring ablationChange of heart rhythm after right pulmonary veins isolation
Incidence of peri-procedural complicationsduring ablationIncidence of peri-procedural complications such as cardiac tamponade, stroke, pericardial effusion \> 1 cm, TIA, vascular complications.

Countries

Poland

Contacts

Primary ContactPiotr Gardziejczyk, MD
piotrgardziejczyk@uckwum.pl225022091

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026