Skip to content

Validating the Novel Classification for the Assessment and Grading of Unexpected Events in Pediatric Surgery: The Clavien-Madadi Classification

Validation of Clavien-Madadi Classification for the Grading of Unexpected Events in Pediatric Surgery

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05778019
Acronym
ComPedS
Enrollment
20
Registered
2023-03-21
Start date
2022-12-01
Completion date
2023-07-31
Last updated
2023-03-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complication of Surgical Procedure

Keywords

Complications, Unexpected events, Severity Grading Systems, Classifications, Clavien-Madadi, Clavien-Dindo

Brief summary

Despite appraisal of the Clavien-Dindo classification in the pediatric surgical literature, some criticize the transfer of the grading systems for adults in a pediatric cohort without modifications. In a recent study it has been shown that few items of the classification do not offer additional information in pediatric cohorts and organizational and management errors have been integrated, not being part of the initial proposal by Dindo et al. In a group of pediatric and general surgeons, methodologists and statisticians of the ERNICA network the Clavien-Dindo classification has been modified for the application in pediatric surgery. The aim is to test and validate the novel Clavien-Madadi classification in a pediatric surgical cohort.

Detailed description

Based on the protocol by Dindo et al. for the assessment of the international acceptability and reproducibility of the Clavien-Dindo classification, the aim is to circulate case scenarios (of complications/ unexpected events) within the ERNICA (European Reference Network for Rare Inherited Congenital Anomalies) network. Those case scenarios (15-20) should be graded by the respondents according to the Clavien-Dindo and Clavien-Madadi classification and preferences for future practice should be reported. Milestones 1. All members of the working group send the PI´s 1-2 case scenarios with unexpected events in the management and treatment of neonates (preferably congenital diseases) and children for each grade of the Clavien-Madadi classification 2. All case scenarios will be circulated within the working group and will be ranked with a Likert scale (1 not accurate - 5 accurate) regarding the plausibility for an international survey 3. A final proposal of 15-20 case scenarios will be circulated within the working group 4. Circulating the case scenarios and the additional questionnaire via the ERNICA email distribution system and newsletter

Interventions

OTHERCase Scenarios of complications to be ranked / classified according to classifications (for the severity grading of events)

Test the feasibility, applicability and logic of a novel instrument for the grading of unexpected events in pediatric surgery (Clavien-Madadi classification) compared to the Clavien-Dindo classification for the grading of postoperative complications in general surgery

Sponsors

Karolinska Institutet
CollaboratorOTHER
Helsinki University Central Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust
CollaboratorOTHER
Ospedale dei Bambini Milano
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Leipzig
CollaboratorOTHER
Namik Kemal University School of Medicine, Tekirdag
CollaboratorOTHER
Hannover Medical School
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to 17 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Case scenarios of unexpected events * Case scenarios on neonatal surgery * Case scenarios on congenital malformations * Case scenarios with (re-)interventions * Case scenarios with organ impairment * Case scenarios with fatal result

Exclusion criteria

* Complex constructed case scenarios * Case scenarios with adult patients * Case scenarios with multiple events

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Grading according to the Clavien-Madadi classificationThree monthsGrading of constructed case scenarios (by an international working group). Grading according to the Clavien-Madadi classification: Grade Ia - organizational and management errors Grade Ib - any deviation from the planned clinical course Grade II - pharmacological treatment Grade IIIa - Re-interventions (minimally-invasive) Grade IIIb - Re-interventions (laparotomy and / or thoracotomy) Grade IV - multiorgan dysfunction Grade V - death

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Grading according to the Clavien-Dindo classificationThree monthsGrading of constructed case scenarios (by an international working group) Grading according to the Clavien-Dindo classification: Grade I - any deviation from the planned postoperative course Grade II - pharmacological treatment Grade IIIa - Re-interventions not under general anesthesia Grade IIIb - Re-interventions under general anesthesia Grade IVa - single-organ dysfunction Grade IVb - multiorgan dysfunction Grade V - death
Comparison of Clavien-Madadi and Clavien-Dindo classificationThree monthsFor each case scenario the respondents will have the option to select the superior classification (or specify no difference)

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026