Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of AC102 Compared to Steroids in Adults With Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (ISSNHL)

Phase II, Multi-Center, Randomized, Blinded Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of a Single Intratympanic Dose of AC102 Compared to Oral Steroids for the Treatment of Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05776459
Enrollment
210
Registered
2023-03-20
Start date
2022-10-13
Completion date
2026-07-31
Last updated
2026-01-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hearing Loss, Sensorineural

Keywords

Hearing Loss, Hearing impairment, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Ear Diseases, Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases, Hearing Loss, Unilateral, Intratympanic Administration, Restoration of Hearing Loss

Brief summary

The purpose of this Phase 2 clinical trial is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and efficacy of AC102 administered as single intratympanic injection compared to oral steroid treatment in patients with Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (ISSNHL).

Interventions

DRUGAC102 gel

Drug: AC102 Single intratympanic injection

DRUGPrednisolone

Active comparator: Prednisolone Tablets taken daily by mouth

OTHERPlacebo Tablets

Placebo Tablets taken daily by mouth

OTHERPlacebo gel

Placebo Single intratympanic injection

Sponsors

AudioCure Pharma GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female patients aged between 18 and 85 years * Unilateral ISSNHL * Onset of unilateral ISSNHL between 24 to 120 hours prior to randomization * An absolute air conduction hearing threshold of at least 65 dB, * Patients with a relative hearing loss of at least 30 dB compared to the current audiogram of the non-affected ear

Exclusion criteria

* Insufficient handling of the language used in the speech audiometry tests * Bilateral hearing loss * Acute hearing loss from noise trauma, barotrauma or head trauma in either ear at any time * Congenital hearing loss * Conductive hearing loss or combined hearing loss determined by a 4PTA \> 10 dB * History of ISSNHL in the past 1 years in the affected ear

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in pure tone audiometry (PTA; dB)28 daysMean change in absolute hearing thresholds measured by PTA from baseline to Day 28

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Absolute improvement of speech recognition measured in quiet compared to baseline using standardized word lists14, 28, 56, 84 daysScores between 0% to 100% correctly understood words at predefined sound pressure levels are determined

Countries

Austria, Czechia, Germany, Poland, Serbia, Ukraine

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026