Skip to content

A Study of Tobemstomig Plus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy vs Pembrolizumab Plus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Participants With Previously Untreated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Phase II, Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Controlled Study of Tobemstomig Plus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Versus Pembrolizumab Plus Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Patients With Previously Untreated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05775289
Enrollment
182
Registered
2023-03-20
Start date
2023-03-15
Completion date
2026-04-30
Last updated
2026-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of tobemstomig (RO7247669) in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy compared with pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in participants with previously untreated, locally advanced, unresectable (Stage IIIB/IIIC) or metastatic (Stage IV) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are not eligible to receive curative surgery and/or definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Interventions

Participants will receive intravenous (IV) tobemstomig for four 21-day cycles

DRUGPembrolizumab

Participants will receive IV pembrolizumab four 21-day cycles

DRUGPaclitaxel

Participants will receive IV paclitaxel Q3W for four 21-day cycles

DRUGPemetrexed

Participants will receive IV pemetrexed Q3W until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity

DRUGCarboplatin

Participants will receive IV carboplatin Q3W for four 21-day cycles

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1 * Histologically or cytologically documented locally advanced, unresectable (Stage IIIB/IIIC) or metastatic (Stage IV) NSCLC who are not eligible for curative surgery and/or definitive chemoradiotherapy * No prior systemic treatment for metastatic NSCLC * Known tumor PD-L1 status * Confirmed availability of representative tumor specimens * Measurable disease * Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks * Adequate hematologic and end-organ function * Negative for HIV, hepatitis B (HBV), and hepatitis C (HCV) * Adequate cardiovascular function

Exclusion criteria

* NSCLC known to have a mutation in the EGFR gene or an ALK fusion oncogene * Symptomatic, untreated, or actively progressing central nervous system (CNS) metastases * Untreated or clinically unstable spinal cord confession * History of leptomeningeal disease * Uncontrolled tumor-related pain * Uncontrolled pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, or ascites requiring recurrent drainage procedures (once a month or more frequently) * Uncontrolled or symptomatic hypercalcemia * Active or history of autoimmune disease or immune deficiency, including, but not limited to, myasthenia gravis, myositis, autoimmune hepatitis, systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, granulomatosis with polyangiitis, Sjögren syndrome, Guillain-Barré syndrome, or multiple sclerosis, with exceptions defined by the protocol * History of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, organizing pneumonia (e.g., bronchiolitis obliterans), drug-induced pneumonitis, or idiopathic pneumonitis, or evidence of active pneumonitis on the screening chest computed tomography (CT) scan * Active tuberculosis (TB) or untreated latent TB * Current treatment with anti-viral therapy for HBV or HCV * Significant cardiovascular disease within 3 months prior to randomization * Major surgical procedure, other than for diagnosis, within 4 weeks prior to initiation of study treatment, or anticipation of need for a major surgical procedure during the study * History of malignancy other than NSCLC within 5 years prior to randomization, with the exception of malignancies with a negligible risk of metastasis or death e.g., 5-year OS\] rate \> 90%), such as adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix, non-melanoma skin carcinoma, localized prostate cancer, ductal breast carcinoma in situ, or Stage I uterine cancer * Severe infection within 4 weeks prior to initiation of study treatment, including, but not limited to, hospitalization for complications of infection, bacteremia, or severe pneumonia, or any active infection that could affect patient safety * Treatment with therapeutic oral or IV antibiotics within 2 weeks prior to initiation of study treatment * Prior allogeneic stem cell or solid organ transplantation * Any other disease, metabolic dysfunction, physical examination finding, or clinical laboratory finding that contraindicates the use of an investigational drug, may affect the interpretation of the results, or may render the patient at high risk from treatment complications * Treatment with a live, attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to initiation of study treatment, or anticipation of need for such a vaccine during study treatment or within 5 months after the final dose of study treatment * Treatment with investigational therapy within 28 days prior to initiation of study treatment * Any anti-cancer therapy, including hormonal therapy, within 21 days prior to initiation of study treatment * Prior treatment with CD137 agonists or immune checkpoint blockade therapies, including, but not limited to, anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4, anti-T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and tyrosine-based inhibition motif domains, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 therapeutic antibodies, and anti-LAG3) agents * Treatment with systemic immunostimulatory agents (including, but not limited to, interferon and interleukin-2) within 4 weeks or 5 drug-elimination half lives (whichever is longer) prior to initiation of study treatment * Treatment with systemic immunosuppressive medication (including, but not limited to, corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, methotrexate, thalidomide, and anti-tumor necrosis factor \[TNF\] agents) within 2 weeks prior to initiation of study treatment, or anticipation of need for systemic immunosuppressive medication during study treatment * History of severe allergic anaphylactic reactions to chimeric or humanized antibodies, fusion proteins, or platinum-containing compounds * Known hypersensitivity to Chinese hamster ovary cell products or to any component of the tobemstomig or pembrolizumab formulation * Known allergy or hypersensitivity or other contraindication to any component of the chemotherapy regimen the patient may receive during the study * Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)Randomization to date of first documented disease progression or death (up to approximately 15 months)PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurs first), as determined by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)Up to approximately 15 monthsORR is defined as the percentage of participants who experience a complete reponse or partial response on two consecutive occasions at least 4 weeks apart as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)From randomization to death from any cause (up to approximately 15 months)OS is defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.
Duration of Response (DOR)From the first occurrence of a confirmed objective response to disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurs first) (up to approximately 15 months)DOR is defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.
PFS in Participants With PD-L1 ExpressionUp to 28 months
OS for Participants With PD-L1 ExpressionUp to 28 months
Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment (EORTC): Physical FunctioningBaseline to week 12The EORTC Item Library 17 (IL17) physical functioning scale measures a participant's ability to perform a variety of physical activities. Raw scores are calculated by estimating the average of the items that contribute to the scale. Linear transformation is then used to standardize the raw score to a total score range of 0-100. Higher scores for this measure indicate better outcomes.
Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL)Baseline to week 12The EORTC Item Library 17 (IL17) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) scale measures the participant's overall health and quality of health over the last week. Raw scores are calculated by estimating the average of the items that contribute to the scale. Linear transformation is then used to standardize the raw score to a total score range of 0-100. Higher scores for this measure indicate a higher quality of life.
Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Role FunctioningBaseline to week 12The EORTC Item Library 17 (IL17) role functioning scale measures the degree to which disease or treatment interferes with the participant's work or daily activities. Raw scores are calculated by estimating the average of the items that contribute to the scale. Linear transformation is then used to standardize the raw score to a total score range of 0-100. Higher scores for this measure indicate better outcomes.
Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Lung Cancer Symptoms/How Much Did You CoughBaseline to week 12The EORTC IL 85 lung cancer symptoms/how much did you cough measure assesses the severity and frequency of coughing over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When RestedBaseline to week 12The EORTC IL 85 short of breath when rested measure assesses the degree of difficulty breathing while resting over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When WalkedBaseline to week 12The EORTC IL 85 short of breath when walked measure assesses the degree of difficulty breathing while walking over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath Climbed StairsBaseline to week 12The EORTC IL 85 short of breath climbed stairs measure assesses the degree of difficulty breathing while climbing stairs over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Pain in ChestBaseline to week 12The EORTC IL 85 pain in chest measure assesses the severity of chest pain over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Need to RestBaseline to week 12The EORTC IL 132 need to rest measure assesses how often the participant felt the need to rest over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Felt WeakBaseline to week 12The EORTC IL 132 felt weak measure assesses how often the participant felt weak over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: TiredBaseline to week 12The EORTC IL 132 tired measure assesses how often the participant felt tired over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Aches/Pain in BonesBaseline to week 12The EORTC IL 188 aches/pain in bones measure assessesthe severity of bone pain over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)From the start of treatment to 90 days after the final dose of treatment (up to 28 months)
Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of TobemstomigUp to approximately 15 months
Time of Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of TobemstomigUp to approximately 15 months
Clearance (CL) of TobemstomigUp to approximately 15 months
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of TobemstomigUp to approximately 15 months
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of TobemstomigUp to approximately 15 months
Half-life (T1/2) of TobemstomigUp to approximately 15 months
Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Baseline up to approximately 15 months

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Brazil, France, Germany, Italy, Mexico, South Korea, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORClinical Trials

Hoffmann-LaRoche

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Male and female participants ages at least 18 years with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pembro + Chemotherapy (Squamous)
Participants with squamous non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received blinded pembrolizumab (pembro) in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin on Day 1 every three weeks (Q3W) for four 21-day cycles, followed by blinded pembro with pemetrexed Q3W until disease progression or treatment discontinuation for a maximum of 24 months of treatment.
25
Pembro + Chemotherapy (Non-squamous)
Participants with non-squamous NSCLC received induction treatment with blinded pembro in combination with pemetrexed and carboplatin on Day 1 Q3W for four 21-day cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with blinded pembro with pemetrexed Q3W until disease progression or treatment discontinuation for a maximum of 24 months of treatment.
66
Tobe + Chemotherapy (Squamous)
Participants with SQ NSCLC received blinded tobemstomig in combination with paclitaxel and carboplatin on Day 1 Q3W until disease progression or treatment discontinuation for a maximum of 24 months of treatment.
24
Tobe + Chemotherapy (Non-squamous)
Participants with NSQ NSCLC received induction treatment with blinded tobemstomig in combination with pemetrexed and carboplatin on Day 1 Q3W for four 21-day cycles, followed by Q3W maintenance therapy with blinded tobemstomig with pemetrexed until disease progression or treatment discontinuation for a maximum of 24 months of treatment.
67
Total182

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTobe + Chemotherapy (Non-squamous)TotalPembro + Chemotherapy (Squamous)Pembro + Chemotherapy (Non-squamous)Tobe + Chemotherapy (Squamous)
Age, Continuous64.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.3
64.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9
66.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
63.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6
63.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
7 Participants29 Participants7 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
53 Participants137 Participants18 Participants49 Participants17 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants16 Participants0 Participants7 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants22 Participants4 Participants10 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants5 Participants0 Participants5 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants20 Participants2 Participants10 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
53 Participants130 Participants18 Participants40 Participants19 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
24 Participants64 Participants5 Participants27 Participants8 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
43 Participants118 Participants20 Participants39 Participants16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 2511 / 658 / 2412 / 65
other
Total, other adverse events
25 / 2563 / 6524 / 2463 / 65
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 2526 / 6514 / 2435 / 65

Outcome results

Primary

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as the percentage of participants who experience a complete reponse or partial response on two consecutive occasions at least 4 weeks apart as determined by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1.

Time frame: Up to approximately 15 months

Population: The analysis population was all randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pembro + ChemotherapyObjective Response Rate (ORR)46.2 Percent of participants
Tobe + ChemotherapyObjective Response Rate (ORR)41.1 Percent of participants
p-value: 0.405695% CI: [0.42, 1.43]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Primary

Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurs first), as determined by the investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1.

Time frame: Randomization to date of first documented disease progression or death (up to approximately 15 months)

Population: The analysis population included all participants that were randomized.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pembro + ChemotherapyProgression-Free Survival (PFS)7.13 Months
Tobe + ChemotherapyProgression-Free Survival (PFS)7.62 Months
p-value: 0.970595% CI: [0.63, 1.56]Log Rank
Secondary

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Tobemstomig

Time frame: Up to approximately 15 months

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) population consisted of participants who received IV tobemstomig.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Tobe + ChemotherapyArea Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of TobemstomigTobe + Paclitaxel + Carboplatin1470 day*ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31.8
Tobe + ChemotherapyArea Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of TobemstomigTobe + Pemetrexed + Carboplatin1500 day*ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 114.2
Secondary

Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Aches/Pain in Bones

The EORTC IL 188 aches/pain in bones measure assessesthe severity of bone pain over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The analysis population for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) includes all randomized participants. Baseline PRO measurements were taken prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, resulting in few or no data points for that timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Aches/Pain in BonesCycle 3 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Aches/Pain in BonesCycle 2 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Aches/Pain in BonesCycle 4 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Aches/Pain in BonesBaseline1.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Aches/Pain in BonesCycle 3 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Aches/Pain in BonesCycle 4 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Aches/Pain in BonesBaseline1.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Aches/Pain in BonesCycle 1 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Aches/Pain in BonesCycle 2 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Felt Weak

The EORTC IL 132 felt weak measure assesses how often the participant felt weak over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The analysis population for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) includes all randomized participants. Baseline PRO measurements were taken prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, resulting in few or no data points for that timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Felt WeakCycle 3 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Felt WeakCycle 2 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Felt WeakCycle 4 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Felt WeakBaseline2.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Felt WeakCycle 3 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Felt WeakCycle 4 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Felt WeakBaseline2.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Felt WeakCycle 1 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Felt WeakCycle 2 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL)

The EORTC Item Library 17 (IL17) Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) scale measures the participant's overall health and quality of health over the last week. Raw scores are calculated by estimating the average of the items that contribute to the scale. Linear transformation is then used to standardize the raw score to a total score range of 0-100. Higher scores for this measure indicate a higher quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The analysis population for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) includes all randomized participants. Baseline PRO measurements were taken prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, resulting in few or no data points for that timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL)Cycle 3 Day 166.67 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL)Cycle 2 Day 166.67 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL)Cycle 4 Day 166.67 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL)Baseline66.67 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL)Cycle 3 Day 166.67 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL)Cycle 4 Day 166.67 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL)Baseline66.67 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL)Cycle 1 Day 183.3 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL)Cycle 2 Day 166.67 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Lung Cancer Symptoms/How Much Did You Cough

The EORTC IL 85 lung cancer symptoms/how much did you cough measure assesses the severity and frequency of coughing over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The analysis population for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) includes all randomized participants. Baseline PRO measurements were taken prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, resulting in few or no data points for that timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Lung Cancer Symptoms/How Much Did You CoughCycle 3 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Lung Cancer Symptoms/How Much Did You CoughCycle 2 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Lung Cancer Symptoms/How Much Did You CoughCycle 4 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Lung Cancer Symptoms/How Much Did You CoughBaseline2.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Lung Cancer Symptoms/How Much Did You CoughCycle 3 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Lung Cancer Symptoms/How Much Did You CoughCycle 4 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Lung Cancer Symptoms/How Much Did You CoughBaseline2.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Lung Cancer Symptoms/How Much Did You CoughCycle 1 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Lung Cancer Symptoms/How Much Did You CoughCycle 2 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Need to Rest

The EORTC IL 132 need to rest measure assesses how often the participant felt the need to rest over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The analysis population for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) includes all randomized participants. Baseline PRO measurements were taken prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, resulting in few or no data points for that timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Need to RestCycle 3 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Need to RestCycle 2 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Need to RestCycle 4 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Need to RestBaseline2.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Need to RestCycle 3 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Need to RestCycle 4 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Need to RestBaseline2.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Need to RestCycle 1 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Need to RestCycle 2 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Pain in Chest

The EORTC IL 85 pain in chest measure assesses the severity of chest pain over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The analysis population for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) includes all randomized participants. Baseline PRO measurements were taken prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, resulting in few or no data points for that timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Pain in ChestCycle 3 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Pain in ChestCycle 2 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Pain in ChestCycle 4 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Pain in ChestBaseline1.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Pain in ChestCycle 3 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Pain in ChestCycle 4 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Pain in ChestBaseline1.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Pain in ChestCycle 1 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Pain in ChestCycle 2 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Role Functioning

The EORTC Item Library 17 (IL17) role functioning scale measures the degree to which disease or treatment interferes with the participant's work or daily activities. Raw scores are calculated by estimating the average of the items that contribute to the scale. Linear transformation is then used to standardize the raw score to a total score range of 0-100. Higher scores for this measure indicate better outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The analysis population for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) includes all randomized participants. Baseline PRO measurements were taken prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, resulting in few or no data points for that timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Role FunctioningCycle 3 Day 166.67 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Role FunctioningCycle 2 Day 183.33 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Role FunctioningCycle 4 Day 183.33 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Role FunctioningBaseline91.67 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Role FunctioningCycle 3 Day 183.33 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Role FunctioningCycle 4 Day 183.33 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Role FunctioningBaseline83.33 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Role FunctioningCycle 1 Day 183.3 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Role FunctioningCycle 2 Day 183.33 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath Climbed Stairs

The EORTC IL 85 short of breath climbed stairs measure assesses the degree of difficulty breathing while climbing stairs over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The analysis population for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) includes all randomized participants. Baseline PRO measurements were taken prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, resulting in few or no data points for that timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath Climbed StairsCycle 3 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath Climbed StairsCycle 2 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath Climbed StairsCycle 4 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath Climbed StairsBaseline2.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath Climbed StairsCycle 3 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath Climbed StairsCycle 4 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath Climbed StairsBaseline2.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath Climbed StairsCycle 1 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath Climbed StairsCycle 2 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When Rested

The EORTC IL 85 short of breath when rested measure assesses the degree of difficulty breathing while resting over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The analysis population for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) includes all randomized participants. Baseline PRO measurements were taken prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, resulting in few or no data points for that timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When RestedCycle 3 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When RestedCycle 2 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When RestedCycle 4 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When RestedBaseline1.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When RestedCycle 3 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When RestedCycle 4 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When RestedBaseline1.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When RestedCycle 1 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When RestedCycle 2 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When Walked

The EORTC IL 85 short of breath when walked measure assesses the degree of difficulty breathing while walking over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The analysis population for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) includes all randomized participants. Baseline PRO measurements were taken prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, resulting in few or no data points for that timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When WalkedCycle 3 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When WalkedCycle 2 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When WalkedCycle 4 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When WalkedBaseline1.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When WalkedCycle 3 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When WalkedCycle 4 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When WalkedBaseline2.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When WalkedCycle 1 Day 11.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Short of Breath When WalkedCycle 2 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: Tired

The EORTC IL 132 tired measure assesses how often the participant felt tired over the past week. The single item is scored on a scale of 1-4, with higher scores indicating worse outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The analysis population for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) includes all randomized participants. Baseline PRO measurements were taken prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, resulting in few or no data points for that timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: TiredCycle 3 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: TiredCycle 2 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: TiredCycle 4 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: TiredBaseline2.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: TiredCycle 3 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: TiredCycle 4 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: TiredBaseline2.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: TiredCycle 1 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the EORTC: TiredCycle 2 Day 12.00 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Change in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment (EORTC): Physical Functioning

The EORTC Item Library 17 (IL17) physical functioning scale measures a participant's ability to perform a variety of physical activities. Raw scores are calculated by estimating the average of the items that contribute to the scale. Linear transformation is then used to standardize the raw score to a total score range of 0-100. Higher scores for this measure indicate better outcomes.

Time frame: Baseline to week 12

Population: The analysis population for patient-reported outcomes (PROs) includes all randomized participants. Baseline PRO measurements were taken prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, resulting in few or no data points for that timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment (EORTC): Physical FunctioningCycle 3 Day 180.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment (EORTC): Physical FunctioningCycle 2 Day 180.00 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment (EORTC): Physical FunctioningCycle 4 Day 186.67 Scores on a scale
Pembro + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment (EORTC): Physical FunctioningBaseline86.67 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment (EORTC): Physical FunctioningCycle 3 Day 180.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment (EORTC): Physical FunctioningCycle 4 Day 180.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment (EORTC): Physical FunctioningBaseline80.00 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment (EORTC): Physical FunctioningCycle 1 Day 193.3 Scores on a scale
Tobe + ChemotherapyChange in Participant-reported Outcomes as Assessed by the European Organisation for Research and Treatment (EORTC): Physical FunctioningCycle 2 Day 180.00 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Clearance (CL) of Tobemstomig

Time frame: Up to approximately 15 months

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) population consisted of participants who received IV tobemstomig.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Tobe + ChemotherapyClearance (CL) of TobemstomigTobe + Paclitaxel + Carboplatin246 mL/dayGeometric Coefficient of Variation 55.6
Tobe + ChemotherapyClearance (CL) of TobemstomigTobe + Pemetrexed + Carboplatin231 mL/dayGeometric Coefficient of Variation 34.5
Secondary

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR is defined as the time from the first occurrence of a documented objective response to disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first.

Time frame: From the first occurrence of a confirmed objective response to disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurs first) (up to approximately 15 months)

Population: The DOR analysis population consisted of participants who achieved an objective response to study treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pembro + ChemotherapyDuration of Response (DOR)NA Months
Tobe + ChemotherapyDuration of Response (DOR)NA Months
Secondary

Half-life (T1/2) of Tobemstomig

Time frame: Up to approximately 15 months

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) population consisted of participants who received IV tobemstomig.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Tobe + ChemotherapyHalf-life (T1/2) of TobemstomigTobe + Paclitaxel + Carboplatin8.45 DayGeometric Coefficient of Variation 196.4
Tobe + ChemotherapyHalf-life (T1/2) of TobemstomigTobe + Pemetrexed + Carboplatin10.4 DayGeometric Coefficient of Variation 83.2
Secondary

Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Tobemstomig

Time frame: Up to approximately 15 months

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) population consisted of participants who received IV tobemstomig.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Tobe + ChemotherapyMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of TobemstomigTobe + Paclitaxel + Carboplatin188 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 27.3
Tobe + ChemotherapyMaximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of TobemstomigTobe + Pemetrexed + Carboplatin191 ug/mLGeometric Coefficient of Variation 43.1
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

Time frame: From the start of treatment to 90 days after the final dose of treatment (up to 28 months)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Pembro + ChemotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)89 Count of participants
Tobe + ChemotherapyNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)89 Count of participants
Secondary

OS for Participants With PD-L1 Expression

Time frame: Up to 28 months

Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.

Time frame: From randomization to death from any cause (up to approximately 15 months)

Population: The efficacy analysis population consisted of all participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Pembro + ChemotherapyOverall Survival (OS)NA Months
Tobe + ChemotherapyOverall Survival (OS)13.17 Months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)

Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 15 months

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) population consisted of participants who received IV tobemstomig.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Tobe + ChemotherapyPercentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Treatment-Emergent42.9 Percentage of participants
Tobe + ChemotherapyPercentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADAs)Treatment-Induced42.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

PFS in Participants With PD-L1 Expression

Time frame: Up to 28 months

Secondary

Time of Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of Tobemstomig

Time frame: Up to approximately 15 months

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) population consisted of participants who received IV tobemstomig.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Tobe + ChemotherapyTime of Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of TobemstomigTobe + Paclitaxel + Carboplatin0.0649 Day
Tobe + ChemotherapyTime of Maximum Concentration (Tmax) of TobemstomigTobe + Pemetrexed + Carboplatin0.0646 Day
Secondary

Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Tobemstomig

Time frame: Up to approximately 15 months

Population: The pharmacokinetic (PK) population consisted of participants who received IV tobemstomig.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
Tobe + ChemotherapyVolume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of TobemstomigTobe + Paclitaxel + Carboplatin3.65 LitersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 40.2
Tobe + ChemotherapyVolume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of TobemstomigTobe + Pemetrexed + Carboplatin3.56 LitersGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 21, 2026