Skip to content

PuraBond® and Pain Following Resection of Oral or Oropharyngeal Mucosal Lesions

A Randomised Controlled Trial Investigating the Use of PuraBond® (3-D Matrix) in Transoral Resections of Primary Oral or Oropharyngeal Mucosal Lesions

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05773781
Acronym
PuraBond PROOF
Enrollment
73
Registered
2023-03-17
Start date
2023-10-16
Completion date
2024-08-30
Last updated
2025-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemorrhage, Hemostatics, Oral Cavity, Oropharynx, Pain

Brief summary

To evaluate the use of Purabond® in transoral resections of primary oral or oropharyngeal lesions for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Patients will be enrolled and randomised to either have PuraBond® applied to the surgical field or not intra operatively. The primary outcome measure will assess if this intervention significantly reduces acute pain during the 30 day post-operative period alongside other post-operative complication rates and recovery outcomes.

Detailed description

PuraBond® PROOF is a prospective, single centre, parallel group randomised controlled trial. Transoral approaches in head and neck surgery have become more common given they offer a minimally invasive approach to surgery, thus removing the need for external incisions in the neck. Post operative pain and bleeding are clinically important factor that directly impact patient recovery. PuraBond® is haemostatic agent, classified as a CE marked class III medical device, that is applied to surgical fields and has been shown to be both safe to use and effective in reducing bleeding. This trial will look to investigate the impact of applying PuraBond® in oral cavity or oropharyngeal operations on post-operative pain outcomes. Patients undergoing a pre-determined set of operations in either the mouth or oropharynx will be randomised to either receive PuraBond® to the surgical field during the operation or not. This allocation will be random and both treatments are currently used as part of routine standard clinical practice. Participants will be asked to monitor and record their pain levels pre and post-operatively by marking their pain level on a continuous scale from 'no pain' to 'the worse possible pain' using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Patients will be enrolled from a single tertiary university hospital trust in the United Kingdom (Liverpool University Hospitals Foundation Trust). Case notes of all patients will also be analysed and data on patient demographics and post operative outcomes collated. This will be the first trial to look at PuraBond® use in head and neck surgery with pain being the primary trial outcome.

Interventions

Application of PuraBond to surgical field

Sponsors

University of Liverpool
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient and disease factors are deemed suitable for transoral surgery under general anaesthetic. * Decision to treat with primary transoral resection or local excision biopsy. * Written informed consent provided. * Clinically suspected or histologically confirmed primary dysplasia or malignancy of the oral cavity or oropharynx OR histologically confirmed diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma in a cervical lymph node of unknown primary. * Patient considered fit for surgery.

Exclusion criteria

* Lesions undergoing incisional or punch biopsy only. * Surgery with planned primary closure or local/ distant flap reconstruction. * Inability to provide written informed consent. * Medical contraindication to a general anaesthetic or to PuraBond® use.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 30Baseline and day 30Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 14Baseline and day 14Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
Change From Baseline in Cumulative Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Postoperative Week 1Baseline and day 7Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
Change From Baseline in Cumulative Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Postoperative Week 2Baseline and day 14Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
Change From Baseline in Cumulative Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Postoperative Day 30Baseline and day 30Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 1Baseline and day 1Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 2Baseline and day 2Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 4Baseline and day 4Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 7Baseline and day 7Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Secondary Return to TheatreDay 1 to day 30 postoperativelyNumber of patients requiring return to operating room
Oral FeedingWithin 30 days post operativelyTime taken to normal dietary intake
Analgesia UseWithin 30 days post operativelyDrug, dose, route and frequency of post-operative analgesia usage
ReadmissionWithin 30 days post operativelyNumber of patients requiring hospital readmission
Primary HaemorrhageWithin 24 hours post operativelyNumber of patients with primary haemorrhage
Secondary HaemorrhageDay 1 to day 30 post operativelyNumber of patients with secondary haemorrhage
LOSWithin 30 days post operativelyLength of stay in hospital
Primary Return to Theatre24 hours post operativelyNumber of patients requiring return to operating room

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PuraBond®
Surgery with PuraBond® application to surgical field.
32
No PuraBond®
Surgery without PuraBond® application to surgical field.
36
Total68

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNo PuraBond®TotalPuraBond®
Age, Continuous64 years64 years64 years
Primary tumour site
Oral cavity
12 Participants21 Participants9 Participants
Primary tumour site
Oropharynx
24 Participants47 Participants23 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
36 participants68 participants32 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants17 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants51 Participants26 Participants
Smoking status
Current
3 Participants9 Participants6 Participants
Smoking status
Ex-smoker
12 Participants24 Participants12 Participants
Smoking status
Never
21 Participants35 Participants14 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 320 / 36
other
Total, other adverse events
6 / 327 / 36
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 323 / 36

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Cumulative Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Postoperative Day 30

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)

Time frame: Baseline and day 30

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Cumulative Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Postoperative Day 302.56 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
No PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Cumulative Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Postoperative Day 303.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.99
Primary

Change From Baseline in Cumulative Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Postoperative Week 1

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)

Time frame: Baseline and day 7

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Cumulative Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Postoperative Week 13.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.75
No PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Cumulative Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Postoperative Week 14.35 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.9
Primary

Change From Baseline in Cumulative Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Postoperative Week 2

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)

Time frame: Baseline and day 14

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Cumulative Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Postoperative Week 22.95 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.67
No PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Cumulative Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Postoperative Week 23.91 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
Primary

Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 1

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)

Time frame: Baseline and day 1

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 12.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.97
No PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 13.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.06
Primary

Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 14

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)

Time frame: Baseline and day 14

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 141.38 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.55
No PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 141.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.88
Primary

Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 2

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)

Time frame: Baseline and day 2

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 22.98 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.79
No PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 23.87 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.97
Primary

Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 30

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)

Time frame: Baseline and day 30

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 300.23 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.65
No PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 300.26 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.88
Primary

Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 4

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)

Time frame: Baseline and day 4

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 43.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.53
No PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 44.06 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
Primary

Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 7

Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)

Time frame: Baseline and day 7

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 73.15 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.61
No PuraBond®Change From Baseline in Pain on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Day 74.28 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Secondary

Analgesia Use

Drug, dose, route and frequency of post-operative analgesia usage

Time frame: Within 30 days post operatively

Secondary

LOS

Length of stay in hospital

Time frame: Within 30 days post operatively

Secondary

Oral Feeding

Time taken to normal dietary intake

Time frame: Within 30 days post operatively

Secondary

Primary Haemorrhage

Number of patients with primary haemorrhage

Time frame: Within 24 hours post operatively

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PuraBond®Primary Haemorrhage0 Participants
No PuraBond®Primary Haemorrhage0 Participants
Secondary

Primary Return to Theatre

Number of patients requiring return to operating room

Time frame: 24 hours post operatively

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PuraBond®Primary Return to Theatre0 Participants
No PuraBond®Primary Return to Theatre0 Participants
Secondary

Readmission

Number of patients requiring hospital readmission

Time frame: Within 30 days post operatively

Secondary

Secondary Haemorrhage

Number of patients with secondary haemorrhage

Time frame: Day 1 to day 30 post operatively

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PuraBond®Secondary Haemorrhage2 Participants
No PuraBond®Secondary Haemorrhage6 Participants
Secondary

Secondary Return to Theatre

Number of patients requiring return to operating room

Time frame: Day 1 to day 30 postoperatively

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
PuraBond®Secondary Return to Theatre1 Participants
No PuraBond®Secondary Return to Theatre1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026