Skip to content

A Study of NT 201 Doses in the Treatment of Platysma Prominence

A Prospective, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of NT 201 Doses in the Treatment of Platysma Prominence

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05773053
Acronym
PAOLA
Enrollment
73
Registered
2023-03-17
Start date
2023-03-22
Completion date
2024-01-24
Last updated
2024-10-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Platysma Prominence

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of NT 201 in adults with moderate to severe platysma prominence.

Interventions

DRUGNT 201

Clostridium botulinum neurotoxin type A (150 kiloDalton \[kD\], free of complexing proteins) powder for solution for injection.

NT 201 Matching-placebo.

Sponsors

Merz Aesthetics GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Presence of four (medial and lateral, left and right) prominent platysmal bands * Moderate to severe platysmal bands as assessed by the investigator and subject on the MAPS-D at maximum contraction

Exclusion criteria

* Any serious disease or disorder (medical or psychiatric) that could interfere with the safe completion of treatment or compromise subject safety * Botulinum toxin treatment in the face (below the lower orbital rim), neck, or chest within the last 12 months prior to study treatment * History of lower face surgery, neck or chest surgery, aesthetic procedures (e.g., ablative skin resurfacing, laser, chemical peel, micro-focused ultrasound, deoxycholic acid injections, micro-needling, non-surgical fat reduction procedure), and orthodontic procedures (e.g., braces) in the 12 months prior to study treatment * Previous use of any permanent (non-biodegradable) or semi-permanent (e.g., calcium hydroxylapatite, poly-L-lactic acid, polymethyl methacrylate, etc.) facial tissue augmentation therapy, lifting sutures, permanent implants or autologous fat to the lower face (i.e., below the level of the bottom of the nose), neck, or chest within 24 months prior to study treatment * Previous use of any hyaluronic acid based or collagen based biodegradable facial tissue augmentation therapy to the lower face (i.e., below the level of the bottom of the nose), neck, or chest within 12 months prior to study treatment * Any medical condition that may put the subject at increased risk with exposure to botulinum toxin of any serotype, including myasthenia gravis, Lambert-Eaton-Syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or any other disorder that might interfere with neuromuscular function * Female of childbearing potential not using a highly effective method of birth control, planning to get pregnant, or pregnant or lactating

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline on the MAPS-D Score at Maximum Contraction as Assessed by the Investigator at Visit 4 (V4)Baseline (Screening Visit), Week 2 (V4)The platysma area will be assessed live by the investigator at maximum contraction and graded according to the validated five-point Merz Aesthetic Platysma Scale-Dynamic (MAPS-D). Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline on the MAPS-D Score at Maximum Contraction as Assessed by the Subject at V4Baseline (Screening Visit), Week 2 (V4)The platysma area will be assessed by the subjects at maximum contraction and graded according to the validated five-point MAPS-D. Scores range from Grade 1 (none to minimal) to Grade 5 (very severe).
Number of Subjects With Related Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (Related TEAEs)Baseline up to Week 17/End of StudyTEAEs are defined as adverse events (AEs) with onset or worsening on or after date and time of first dose of study treatment. An AE is considered to be related if a causal relationship between NT 201 and the AE is at least reasonably possible.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026