Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aims to demonstrate the preventive effect of compression therapy using surgical gloves in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are utilized for comparing the change in neuropathic pain between intervention and control groups. Among the PROMs, the neurotoxicity component of the functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-taxane (FACT-Tax) is used for good and poor outcomes between baseline and post-chemotherapy in paclitaxel-treated breast cancer patients.
Detailed description
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is associated with side effects of taxanes, including paclitaxel. The common side effect may adversely affect the quality of life. However, no treatment for CIPN can be strongly recommended. Therefore, prevention is important. Cryotherapy, compression therapy, and exercise therapy can be considered for prevention, but no definitive recommendations are available. Studies with wider sample sizes are needed to confirm the efficacy and the preventive methods are complex for application. The study use surgical gloves for compression therapy to reduce discomfort and increase compliance with the procedure. Patients with stage II-III breast cancer who receive paclitaxel chemotherapy for at least 12 weeks in six academic hospitals in South Korea will participate in the study. The study design is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. The patients are randomly assigned to intervention or control groups. Intervention patients will wear two-layer of normal-sized surgical gloves on both hands during chemotherapy infusion. The primary outcome is to demonstrate the preventive effect of compression therapy using surgical gloves as measured by the change in the neurotoxicity of FACT-Tax questionnaire.
Interventions
DEVICECompression therapy using surgical gloves
Intervention group wear two-layer of normal-sized surgical gloves on both hands during chemotherapy infusion
Sponsors
Young-Joon Kang
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
19 Years to 69 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Age greater or equal to 19 years, under 70 years old * Stage II-III breast cancer * No distant metastasis * Patient scheduled to be receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant paclitaxel for at least 12 weeks * Signed informed consent * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤ 2 (Karnofsky ≥60%)
Exclusion criteria
* Recurred breast cancer * Patients who have previously received treatment that could cause neuropathy; taxane or platinum-based chemotherapy, antitubulins, proteasome inhibitors * Known history of neuropathy * Chronic kidney disease * Raynaud's phenomenon * Peripheral vascular disease; peripheral arterial ischemia * Cold intolerance * Allergy in natural rubber latex or surgical gloves * Patients who have dermatitis, wound, or musculoskeletal problems in hand at enrollment * Current use medications which may mitigate chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy; duloxetine, gabapentin/pregabalin, Baclofen-amitriptyline-ketamine (BAK; topical amitriptyline, ketamine, ±baclofen), oral cannabinoids, tricyclic antidepressants, ganglioside-monosialic acid
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in the 11 items neurotoxicity component of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Taxane (FACT-NTX) Therapy subscale | Before starting paclitaxel course (baseline), and 1~2 weeks from finishing paclitaxel course chemotherapy (target) | The change in FACT-NTX will be divided into a good outcome (change in FACT-NTX less than five from baseline to target timeframe) versus a poor outcome (change in FACT NTX greater than or equal to five from baseline to target timeframe). The difference in the number of poor outcome participants will compare between the two groups. The FACT-NTX is 5-point Likert-type scale. Each item measures on a 0-4 scale (0, not at all; 4, very much). A greater change in the FACT-NTX score was considered a clinically meaningful increase in CIPN. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Changes in 16 items component of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Taxane (FACT-Taxane) Therapy subscale | Baseline, during paclitaxel course (about 1.5 months after starting), 1~2 weeks from finishing course, and six months after finishing paclitaxel course | The score changes in 16 items (neurotoxicity and taxane) component of the FACT-Taxane scale will be compared between the two groups. The FACT-Taxane is 5-point Likert-type scale. Each item measures on a 0-4 scale (0, not at all; 4, very much). A scale of 0 indicates a better outcome, and 4 indicates a worse outcome. |
| Changes in 27 items component of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale | Baseline, during paclitaxel course (about 1.5 months after starting), 1~2 weeks from finishing course, and six months after finishing paclitaxel course | The score changes in general 27 items component of the FACT-G scale will be compared between the two groups. The FACT-G consists of four well-being subscales; physical well-being (7-item), social/family well-being (7-item), emotional well-being (6-item), and functional well-being (7-item). The FACT-G is 5-point Likert-type scale (0, not at all; 4, very much). For physical and emotional well-being, the higher the sum of scores, the lower the quality of life; for social/family and functional well-being, the higher the sum of scores, the higher the quality of life. |
| Changes in the 11 items neurotoxicity component of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Taxane (FACT-NTX) Therapy subscale at additional periods. | During paclitaxel course (about 1.5 months after starting) and six months after finishing paclitaxel course | The change in FACT-NTX will be divided into a good outcome (change in FACT-NTX less than five from baseline to target timeframe) versus a poor outcome (change in FACT NTX greater than or equal to five from baseline to target timeframe). The difference in the number of poor outcome participants will compare between the two groups. The FACT-NTX is 5-point Likert-type scale. Each item measures on a 0-4 scale (0, not at all; 4, very much). A greater change in the FACT-NTX score was considered a clinically meaningful increase in CIPN. |
| FACT-NTX 11-item total score (continuous) | Baseline, during chemotherapy (mid-cycle), 1-2 weeks after completion of paclitaxel, and 6 months after completion | Mean FACT-NTX 11-item total score at each time point and change from baseline, analyzed using mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM). Higher scores indicate greater neurotoxicity (range 0-44). |
| Change in National Cancer Institute-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) for CIPN | Baseline, during paclitaxel course (about 1.5 months after starting), 1~2 weeks from finishing course, and six months after finishing paclitaxel course | NCI-CTCAE for CIPN is a method for reporting adverse event severity by a combination of clinical evaluation. The adverse effects of CIPN to be investigated are peripheral motor, sensory neuropathy, dysesthesia, paresthesia, neuralgia, and skin/nail toxicity. |
| Comfort with intervention scale score | during paclitaxel course (about 1.5 months after starting), 1~2 weeks from finishing course, and six months after finishing paclitaxel course | Comfort with the intervention (two-layer of surgical gloves) will be assessed on 4-point scale. The points are classified 0=dissatisfied; 1=not satisfied; 2=satisfied; 3=very satisfied. |
Countries
South Korea
Outcome results
None listed