Skip to content

Effects of Neck Stabilization Exercise With Heat Therapies

Effect of Heat Therapies on Pain, Functional Status, Range of Motion, and Disability in Patients With Neck Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT05771441
Enrollment
100
Registered
2023-03-16
Start date
2020-05-01
Completion date
2022-05-01
Last updated
2023-03-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Keywords

hot pack, exercise, ultrasound therapy

Brief summary

In this study, we aimed to determine the effects of heat therapies and neck stabilization exercises on pain, disability, range of motion, and mood of NP patients.

Detailed description

Chronic non-specific neck pain (NP) has become one of the main causes of disability in the adult population around the world.Several treatment options used like; exercise, manual therapy, electrotherapy, and hot treatments etc. In this study, we aimed to determine the effects of heat therapies and neck stabilization exercises on pain, disability, range of motion, and mood of NP patients.100 patients with NP will be included.Patients will be randomyl assigned to 4 groups and will receive a total of 3 weeks of treatment. Patients' pain levels (visual analogoue scale VAS), quality of life (short form 36), mood (Beck deppression inventory BDI), range of motion, and neck disability index were evaluated prior to treatment, at 6th and at 12th weeks.

Interventions

OTHERneck stabilization exercise (nse)

neck stabilization exercise (nse)- exercise

OTHERNSE + HOT PACK THERAPY

NSE + HOT PACK THERAPY- exercise plus heat therapy

OTHERNSE + infrared therapy

NSE + infrared therapy- exercise plus heat therapy

OTHERNSE + ultrasound therapy

NSE + ultrasound therapy exercise plus heat therapy

Sponsors

Hilal Yeşil
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Patients with chronic neck pain

Exclusion criteria

* sensory deficit on neck area, servical disc pathologies, neurological deficit, malignity, secondary causes for neck pain, active inflammation, arthritis on the neck area, serious mental health problems, pregnancy, spine surgery, and having received treatment to the cervical region in the last 6 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
change from baseline VAS (visual analog scale) at 6th and 12th weekup to 12 weeksThe patients were asked to make an assesment of their pain level between 0 and 10 scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change from baseline quality of life (short form 36) at 6th and 12th weekup to 12 weeksThe physical and mental health summary scores were the primary components used. Scoring is on a scale of 0 to 100 and a higher score reflects better health-related quality of life.
Change from baseline shoulder range of motion (ROM) at 6th and 12th weekup to 12 weeksThe patients' joint range of motion will be measured with a goniometer.
Change from baseline Beck depression inventory (BDI) at 6th and 12th weekup to 12 weeksA total Beck score (0-63) is obtained by giving each question a score of 0-3 in the survey. 17 is considered the threshold value for the degree of depression.
Change from baseline neck disability index (NDI) at 6th and 12th weekup to 12 weeksPatient-completed, condition-specific functional status questionnaire with 10 items including pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleeping and recreation. The NDI has sufficient support and usefulness to retain its current status as the most commonly used self-report measure for neck pain

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026